Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Solstice’s moonshots

Channel

Solstice’s moonshots

@solsticesmoonshots

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,765subscribers

+3,513 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002032946187
TypeChannel
Username@solsticesmoonshots
DescriptionUnbridled thoughts and opinions @DaSolstice is me. @Rainbetcom #1 Non-kyc Crypto Casino & Sportsbook
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/solsticesmoonshots

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

24,25227,82026,03627,7656 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net +3,513. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,717–28,355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:0627,765-13
9 Nov 2026, 13:3927,778-8
8 Nov 2026, 07:2027,786-24
7 Nov 2026, 00:3727,810-10
6 Nov 2026, 00:5027,820+2
5 Nov 2026, 02:4827,818+28
4 Nov 2026, 02:5927,790+66
2 Nov 2026, 23:5627,724+79
1 Nov 2026, 22:5427,645+34
1 Nov 2026, 02:1027,611+25
31 Oct 2026, 04:2827,586+71
30 Oct 2026, 02:3827,515+65
29 Oct 2026, 02:3727,450+29
27 Oct 2026, 22:1827,421-9
25 Oct 2026, 21:0127,430-7
24 Oct 2026, 21:5527,437-13
23 Oct 2026, 21:2027,450+194
22 Oct 2026, 18:4927,256+17
21 Oct 2026, 12:0127,239-1
20 Oct 2026, 07:5627,240first reading

Engagement

470 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 151 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.25%
avg views ÷ 27,765 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
172 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.883%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
173
of 470 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 170 of 172 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held470 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total346,280
Reactions total3,028
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,160
Videos
≈144
Links
≈5,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

7,386 reactions across 465 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,64649.4%
🔥1,41519.2%
🤣4005.42%
😭3184.31%
💯2753.72%
👍2503.38%
😁1532.07%
🍌1181.60%
🙏1041.41%
👏881.19%
🥴811.10%
🫡690.934%
😢470.636%
💔360.487%
👀300.406%
🤨270.366%
🥰270.366%
🌚240.325%
🐳230.311%
😐200.271%
33 further kinds2353.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 465 of the 470 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,386 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 470 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 469 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @solsticesmoonshots. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 470 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 173 posts held from the last 30 days (3.47%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 02:28 UTC≈1,200 views37 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Good news is According to my research we're fairly close to the macro btc bottom And after that it's relatively up only to new highs (could be choppy and take a while, but still) We should get a lot more and bigger opportunities along that path even if things feel so dog shit rn

❤35👍1😁1

11 Nov 2026, 22:52 UTC≈1,240 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026

I've always struggled with perps I got good at finding tops and bottoms but execution in between, targets, when to sit on my hands, it's an endless game I had delegated a bit too much trust on the recent run and my quant was wrong a few times in a row I got stuck longing alts near the top And positioning for another bounce too early Even though I had already had my own personal concerns on if btc had already top…

❤16👏2

11 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,530 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Sometimes I see people attacking me and I'm not even mad because I see what they are They don't know me They just see a big acc and assume we're all just part of some evil cohesive unit trying to touch them because that's how it certainly feels. We're all just suffocating here https://x.com/The__Solstice/status/2120450652669346016

❤20😁3😢2🥴1

10 Nov 2026, 04:53 UTC≈1,920 views25 reactionsread 12 November 2026

I think one more leg lower on majors then it's finally over with and we can bottom out

🔥13❤8🌚3😢1

9 Nov 2026, 23:59 UTC≈1,930 views35 reactionsread 12 November 2026

I still think billion dollar stonks isn't a pipe dream, and if they fall it is a very bad outlook for traders Pumpfun only made changes when their hand was forced. Aka stonk threatened their marketshare Solana won't let stonk lose.

❤19👍6🔥5🥴2💯1😁1😭1

9 Nov 2026, 23:58 UTC≈1,880 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Essentially from my understanding for stonk, during the run up of zcat and the explosion it's clear raydium had gotten solana foundation involved and there's deeper forces at play here Now it's just a matter of them stepping back in at the right time to rocket this again and take over

❤10🥴3😁1

9 Nov 2026, 05:37 UTC≈4,200 views102 reactions2 Starsread 12 November 2026

I'm so sorry guys, I wish things were better, and I wish I guided us somehow into making more money together Sometimes when I'm at the top I really think for a moment I can Then I'm reminded quickly of how human I am I will be very honest with you, the feelings I get here in the market right now are some of the lowest I've had since the last bottom I am hoping that translates into a good thing at some point and w…

❤68👍13🫡9🤣6🔥2🌭1🍌1🐳1

8 Nov 2026, 22:51 UTC≈2,220 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Was gonna just write this in here but decided to do it on twitter https://x.com/The__Solstice/status/2119563337516392538

❤9🙏2

8 Nov 2026, 19:12 UTC≈2,240 views27 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

Complete Armageddon when does it end

🙈14❤7🍌4🤗1😁1

8 Nov 2026, 19:12 UTC≈2,190 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026

I don't think I've ever seen on chain this bad

❤14🤣9😭3

8 Nov 2026, 01:46 UTC≈2,370 views23 reactionsread 12 November 2026

💧 Rainbet is the #1 Non-KYC crypto casino & sportsbook with instant withdrawals! Use our affiliate link or code: 20boosts For 20% rakeback boost & more! ⚡️ 💧 rainbet.com $25,000 Daily Race $100,000 Weekly Race $1 MILLION dollars Monthly Race $20,000 Weekly Raffle And many more live prize pools @rainbetcom

😭16🍌3❤2🤨2

8 Nov 2026, 01:09 UTC≈2,190 views32 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Might be back in a week or two Don't want to buy and shill you guys anything new in this market rn Let's see how things look when btc finds a bottom

👍17❤9👏4🍌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 470 posts we hold for @solsticesmoonshots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @solsticesmoonshots as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
6.2 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Solstice's Degens
@solsticedegens · 6,825
#1
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,030
#2
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 13,858
#3
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,580
#4
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,013
#5
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,224
#6
666 🔥 Calls
@x666calls · 17,561
#7
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,694
#8
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,774
#9
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,113
#10
Iced's Inbred HQ
@inbredhq · 7,201
#11
Persian Cooks 🔮
@persiancooks · 3,458
#12
Cold Capital ❄️
@ColdCapital · 4,365
#13
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,545
#14
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,047
#15
PRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 18,558
#16
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,000
#17
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,250
#18
Prerich lobby by mememe 💸
@prerichlobby69 · 6,634
#19
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,888
#20
ferb's friends
@ferbsfriendz · 5,217
#21
Klutch Trades
@klutchtrades · 4,405
#22
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,084
#23
Plz fade mustacho’s cooks 😈
@LittleMustachoCalls · 9,401
#24
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,688
#25
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,123
#26
Fomo’s Mojo Dojo Casa House
@fomomofosol · 14,195
#27
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,601
#28
Affu Calls
@affucalls · 6,848
#29
The Tribunal Court of Defi
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,767
#30
Patty's Trap House
@pattystraphouse · 2,791
#31
Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom
@pwnlord · 8,386
#32
Fomo’s Gambling Gays
@gamblinggays · 10,809
#33
maison's diary 📝
@maisoncalls · 10,123
#34
Kanye's Greatest Hits
@KanyesGreatestHits · 5,316
#35
Cautious bull run enjoyers
@smolinsanity · 14,011
#36
Diary of Apes | α |
@diaryofapes · 4,563
#37
Ev's Alphas
@HardSnipe · 11,639
#38
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 39,504
#39
CTM Calls
@CryptoTalkManZone · 10,363
#40
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 34,692
#41
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,706
#42
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 27,113
#43
eezzy’s degen journal
@eezzydegenjournal · 12,697
#44
Lexapro’s Feed
@lexaprosfeed · 13,190
#45
MANIFESTING RICHES
@manifestingriches · 8,729
#46
Sage’s Degen Trenches
@sagextrenches · 4,510
#47
Acid’s Crypto Blog (AcidRainbowHalo)
@Acidonmeliketheraincalls · 3,334
#48
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,118
#49
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 98,187
#50
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,235
#51
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 46,885
#52
wuzie makes money
@wuziemakesmoney · 8,845
#53
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,484
#54
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,776
#55
based kook calls
@hellokook · 15,876
#56
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 46,632
#57
Pyro Trading Journal
@pyrotradingjournal · 14,743
#58
FAST's PALACE
@fastspalace · 3,142
#59
wat is des
@watisdes · 29,838
#60
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,171
#61
Shah’s Journal
@shahlito · 30,842
#62
AJM Gems
@AJM1000x · 6,790
#63
Hopium Casino
@HopiumCasino · 13,938
#64
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 35,456
#65
Jamie's Cave👨🏻‍💻
@jamiescave · 13,270
#66
SHITTY CALLS BY POE (DON'T BUY)
@SHITTYCALLZBYPOE · 10,667
#67
Xander's Trenches
@xanderstrenches · 11,019
#68
Catolicc's Oil Money
@catolicc100x · 10,850
#69
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 36,545
#70
goodmans journal
@solgoodmancalls · 7,838
#71
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 78,667
#72
Mrpunk Gamble
@Mrpunkgamble · 7,445
#73
Gake’s Bakes
@GakesBakes · 26,526
#74
yelo's degen log
@yeloalfa · 10,524
#75
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 28,774
#76
Reaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 14,045
#77
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 26,408
#78
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 15,677
#79
Stuff im (Penn) buying
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,296
#80
degnben’s cartel ✍️
@degenBENPLAYS · 2,547
#81

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,224
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 18,774
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 43,813
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝
@J7tradingjournal · 20,586
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,013
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,580
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 81,853
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,324
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,706
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 September 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,047
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,030
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
PRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 18,558
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 October 2026
Euni Calls 🦄
@eunicalls · 28,628
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 39,504
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,000
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 27,113
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
🐧Dippy Alpha Calls
@dippy_calls · 24,173
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
Meta caller
@metacaller · 41,057
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Cooker's Cooks
@CookersCooks · 18,759
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 October 2026
SolidTradesz 堅固
@solidtradesz · 22,882
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 34,888
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Renzos Degen Alpha
@degenrenzo · 18,544
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
Meta Gambler
@MetaGambler · 26,840
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,688
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 98 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Solstice’s moonshots” (@solsticesmoonshots), 27,765 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solsticesmoonshots.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.