Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

여의도메모리맛집

@tastystock

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,591subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002399867825
TypeChannel
Username@tastystock
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tastystock

Growth

2,5782,5912,584.56 August 2026 — 2,581 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,581 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,578 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,591 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,576–2,593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:062,591+13
10 Aug 2026, 13:532,578-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:072,581no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:452,581first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.8%
avg views ÷ 2,591 subscribers
Avg views / post
772
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.436%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held25 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total19,312
Reactions total70
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2535.7%
🥰1217.1%
👍912.9%
👏811.4%
😁710.0%
🤔45.71%
🔥34.29%
😈11.43%
🤯11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC340 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aetherjapanresearchPhoto

최태원 회장이 SK 하이닉스 1.5주년치 현물배당(HBM칩스, 2000원)을 하고 있다.

😁2

7 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC497 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fundeasy_choi

차라리 주주에게 특별히 디램을 싸게 구매할 수 있게 해주시면 어떨까요?

😁5

7 Aug 2026, 01:59 UTC741 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

소비재는 진짜 하이엔드나 바이럴 터지는거만 보는 이유

7 Aug 2026, 01:59 UTC693 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarketSnapKPhoto

AI가 노동의 몫을 50% 아래로 밀 수 있다 (JP모건) 미국 경제에서 노동자에게 돌아가는 소득의 몫이 이미 사상 최저 수준으로 내려온 가운데, AI 확산이 이를 더욱 낮출 수 있다는 분석이 나왔습니다. 2026년 1분기 비농업 부문의 노동소득분배율은 부가가치 1달러당 53.7센트까지 하락했으며, JP모건은 현재 추세와 AI의 영향을 고려하면 2030년 말 이전 50% 아래로 내려갈 가능성도 제시했는데요. AI를 생산 과정에 반영한 16개 거시모형 가운데 11개 역시 장기적으로 노동의 몫이 크게 줄어드는 결과를 내놨습니다. 문제는 이러한 변화가 노동시장에만 머물지 않을 수 있다는 점입니다. 소득이 소비 성향이 높은 노동자보다 자본 보유자에게 더 많이 돌아가면 고소득층의 저축 과잉이 심화되고, 이를 흡수하기 위해 반대편에서는 정부나 해외

6 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC825 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

국민배당금에 찬성해야 하는 이유) 삼성전자=국민기업 이니까 삼성전자 배당=국민배당금 아닌가? 내놔 주주환원!!! 반박시 김용범 https://t.me/tastystock/2162

3🔥1🤯1

6 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC722 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mstaryunPhoto

#AI매출 #CAPEX #수익화

👏4

6 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC811 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @milkteaking42

전설적 엔지니어 Jeff Dean이 27년간 몸 담고 있던 구글을 떠나서 스타트업을 창업함. AI의 궁극적 목표는 에이전트 따위가 아님. 과학의 진보임. Discovery Loop says it plans to use high-octane algorithms to initiate and iterate thousands of experiments simultaneously, with the goal of partially automating the research process and expanding the scale at which experimentation can be conducted. The startup is also interested in using AI to help create more powerful AI (a proc

6 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC640 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rafikiresearch

이 말이 맞으면 투자와, 발행과, 증자와 광기가 넘치는 세상이라는 거잖아..

6 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC667 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rafikiresearch

Morgan Stanley Sees $600 Billion of Chip Financing for Two Labs 2026-08-05 18:22:29 GMT By Charlotte Plaskwa (Bloomberg) -- Chip financing needs for two AI labs, supported in varying degrees by two chip makers, could exceed $600 billion by 2030, dwarfing the current compute contract delayed-draw term loan market, according to a research note by Morgan Stanley on Wednesday. * If Broadcom Inc.’s AI XPV Platform scal

5 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC855 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

주주환원을 하랬더니 주주환승을 하니 어이가 없지만, 냉정하게 대형 이슈인가?를 생각해 보면 아니라는 결론.

7

5 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC857 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alcoholwithmarket

#도서요약 #발췌 #생각정리 매매원칙에 따라 포지션이 모두 털렸는데 재반등하면 어떻게 해야 해야할지 알려주는 월리엄오닐의 매매 사례 ㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡ 애플은 필자들이 월리엄오닐컴퍼니 포트폴리오 매너지 시절 투자했던 마지막 최고의 주식이었고, 오닐 역시 상당부분을 투자하고 있었다. 애플이 2005년 10월 실적을 발표했을 때, 우리는 오닐의 전형적인 투자감각을 마지막으로 목격할 수 있었다. 애플의 주가는 이미 상당한 상승한 이후였고, 덕분에 10월 실적 발표 직전에는 매도세가 발생했다. 그래서 갭하락으로 장을 시작하더니 50일 이동평균선이 무너졌다. 오닐은 이때 투자 포지션의 상당부분을 매도했는데, 당일 50일 이동평균선 바로 위에서 종가가 결정되었다. 실적발표 다음날 주가는 50일 이동평균선 상에서 반등했고, 거래량도

6👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @tastystock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 701,296 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“여의도메모리맛집” (@tastystock), 2,591 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tastystock.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.