Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PAIGU - Pagu's AI Diary

@paigudiary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003993854023
TypeChannel
Username@paigudiary
DescriptionAI Newbie's dirty stuffs
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 20 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/paigudiary

Growth

558 August 2026 — 55 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:3155no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:0055first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
403.5%
avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
Avg views / post
222
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total4,439
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
44
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @umjuninsightPhoto

아캄(Arkham)이 어제부로 공식적으로 x402 표준을 API에 지원하게 된 사실을 아시나요? [관련 트윗] 마침 공유해주신 메세지가 기억이나서, GPT에 권한 부여한후, agentcash, arkham x402 endpoint 이용해서 오늘 상장한 $CAP 핫월렛 추적하고 대시보드 만들어달라고 요청하니 24분만에 깔끔하게 만들어주네요

5 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC24 viewsread 10 August 2026

아니 벌시 이젠 나도 내가 뭘 만드는건지를 모르겠네

5 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026

❯ 지금 데이터가 수집되고 분석되어서 승격되고 결국 거래 신호가 된 후에 거래가 되고 집계되서 대시보드에 보여지는 모든 과정을 매우 쉬운 단어로 상세히 설명해봐 - train (학습): 옛날 데이터. 여기서 모델을 만듭니다. - calibration (조율): 그 다음 2일. 여기 성적으로 4개 중 하나를 고릅니다. - evaluation (평가): 가장 최근 3일. 여기는 절대 손대지 않다가 마지막에 딱 한 번 채점합니다. 경계선에는 "엠바고"를 겁니다. 학습 데이터의 결과가 평가 구간까지 걸쳐 있으면 그건 미래를 컨닝한 셈이라 통째로 버립니다. 겹치는 관측도 솎아냅니다. 여기에 더해 walk-forward 3회 — 시간을 조금씩 밀면서 세 번 반복 검증합니다. 우연히 한 번 잘 맞은 게 아닌지 확인하는 거죠. --- [3] 승격 —

5 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrencymagePhoto

🚨 npm 공급망 공격 발생 - 440개 이상 패키지 감염 (누적 다운로드 20억+) OX Security에 따르면 Shai-Hulud 캠페인으로 440개 이상의 npm 패키지가 악성 코드에 감염됐으며, 영향 범위는 월간 누적 다운로드 20억 건 이상으로 추정됩니다. (TechRadar) 감염된 패키지를 설치하면: GitHub 토큰, npm 토큰, AWS/GCP/Azure 등 클라우드 자격증명 탈취 CI/CD 환경의 시크릿 및 환경변수 탈취 탈취한 토큰으로 GitHub·npm 계정을 이용해 추가 확산 일부 변종은 토큰을 강제로 폐기하면 시스템 파일을 삭제하는 와이퍼 기능까지 포함 (Akamai) 특히 Keyv와 Cacheable 생태계 등 많은 프로젝트에서 사용하는 라이브러리가 포함되어 있어 직접 설치하지 않았더라도 의존성(Depende

3 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026

이런건 어찌 파는 거지... '파줘' 한다고 나오는건 아닌건데

3 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC22 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @nuttyflavorsPhoto

😒 Effective Altruism again? 1월에도 한번 Anthropic과 EA 연관썰 돌다가 잠잠해졌는데 이번에 레오폴드로 인해 다시 떠오르는 관계. Anthropic은 Effective Altruism 그 자체 - 아모데이 본인도 EA연관 블로그 기고/서약도했고 사상도 비슷 - 동생 Daniel Amodei는 아예 EA 핵심인물이자 givewell cofounder와 결혼 - Chief of Staff인 Avital도 레오와 함께 FTX Future Fund에서 일했으며, EA를 형성한 Future of Humanity Institute 출신 - FTX가 초기 대규모 투자 - 공동창업자 Ben Mann도 19년 EA 공개선언 - Claude 성격/가치관 담당 Amanda도 서약자 - LTBT라는 anthropic 독립 거버넌

2 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC896 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

??? 클로드 쳐돌았나? 왜 지가 웃겨?! 웃기네 이거

2 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC27 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @crypt0made

Ai 툴 구독료 부가세 3개월치 환급법 1. 통상 해외 AI 구독료엔 부가세 10% 붙음. 2. But 10%, 공제가 안됨. (Why? 간편사업자등록만 한 외국 회사의 경우 세금계산서 발행불가.) 3. 좌측 하단 요금제 → 설정 → 결제 → 업데이트에서 성명을 사업자명으로 변경 사업자등록번호 입력 후 업데이트. * 앤트로픽 공식 안내에는 "이미 결제된 건은 소급 적용 안 됨" 써있지만 사업자등록번호 넣었더니 지난 3개월치 부가세가 환불되는 사례도 존재. * 클로드 이외에도 챗지피티, 퍼플렉시티 등 국내에 간편사업자등록만 해놓은 해외 서비스는 전부 똑같음. 👉결제 페이지, Tax ID, VAT number 칸에서 진행. 단, 구글 워크스페이스는 다름. 사업자등록번호 등록하고 원화로 결제하면 전자세금계산서가 나와서 정상 공제됨.

29 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC814 viewsread 10 August 2026

내가 느낀 CODEX vs Claude Code CODEX - 끈질김 - 깐깐함. 특히 보안쪽 - 그래서 자기 발목 잡는 경우가 종종 있음 - 그래서 어쩌다 보면 무한루프 돌림. 자기가 한다고 해놓고, 자기 보아정책에 발목잡혀서 실패하고 다시 반복 - 플러그인 잘되어 있음. 원클릭으로 뭔가 '공식적' 으로 다른 App 이나 프로그램에 연결함 - 자주 사용량 리셋 해주고, 셀프 리셋할 수 있는 쿠폰도 가끔 줌 - 다음 명령을 입력하면 대기줄에 올라가거나 Steering 으로 들어가는데, 스티어링의 경우 약간 기존 하던 작업을 방해하는 느낌 - Record & Replay 는 Mac 만 되는듯 - Claude CLI 로 불러와서 기획/리뷰 하라고 했는데, 보안정책이 빡쎄서 맨처음 시작할때만 되고, 중간에 프로젝트 내용을 외부로

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @paigudiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 427,307 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PAIGU - Pagu's AI Diary” (@paigudiary), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paigudiary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.