Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

허위정보채널

@JOOONGDO

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

905subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003374653195
TypeChannel
Username@JOOONGDO
Description대부분 허위정보입니다.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/JOOONGDO

Growth

9057 Aug 2026, 17:48 — 905 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:03 — 905 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:488 Aug 2026, 01:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 904–906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:03905no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:48905first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.7%
avg views ÷ 905 subscribers
Avg views / post
414
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,857
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
425
Videos
6
Links
250

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC131 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/robinetchapp/status/2085338930958717249 왠지 모르겠는데 인기 존나 많은데 하실분 하셈

7 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC174 viewsread 8 August 2026

X 해킹 당하는 사람 왜케 많냐 내주위에만 3명이네 다들 이것저것 연결해놓은거 싹다 끊어놓고 옛날에 디코 드간거도 다 끊고 나가버리셈

5 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC401 viewsread 8 August 2026

아니 술먹고 3:1로 싸웠는데 전신으로 문신한 깡패들이 3임 아무튼 비겼음 근데 변호사 왈 - 최소 상해진단서 4주이상 끊어와야한다 (2주치 끊어감) - 그리고 너도 폭행했으므로 둘다 폭행죄다 - 둘다 폭행죄라면 너가 불리하다 왜? 너는 전과가 없으니까 쟤들은 합의안한다고 배째라하고 서로 폭행 전과 들어가면 너처럼 전과없는애가 불리하다. - 특히 공기업 공무원 의사 등등은 더 불리하다. - 역으로 너가 합의하자고 하는게 더 좋을지도 모른다. 다만 너의 가오상하니까 서로 전과 남는쪽으로 기울수밖에없다. - 현재 검찰 10월에 없어지니까 검찰이 그나마 약자를 보호해주는 느낌인데 .. 어쩌고 저쩌고 요지는 3:1로 다구리 맞으며 싸웠는데도 깡패가 더 유리함. 그나마 약자의 편인 검찰이 사라지니 깊게 수사가 안들어가서 억울할 사람이

5 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC419 viewsread 8 August 2026

오늘 신남성연대 배인규씨 사망 ㄷㄷ;; 이건 어제자 효잉 영상인데 얘도 위험해보이네.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFDrm4BLyuI

5 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 8 August 2026

오늘 폭행관련해서 변호사 만나고 왔는데 30분간 상담하면서 다섯번이나 반복해서 하는말이 " 검찰 10월에 사라집니다. 한국 망했어요." 이런말을함 ㄷㄷ 그리고 이제부터 연말까지 억울할 사람들 많아질거라고 예상하더라고요.

3 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC436 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😂 개인적인 도박 순위 1등 밈코인 2등 선물 3등 예측시장

3 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC451 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

폴리마켓에서 절대 하면안되는건 자국 정치 베팅 이유는 특정하기 쉬움.. 뻔하겠지만 본인들이 자국의 상황을 잘아니까 본인이 한국인이라고 홍보하는 느낌 온체인으로 베팅한거 싹 수집해서 바낸으로 보내고 업비트로 보낸거 협조 요청하면 ...

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @JOOONGDO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 393,378 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“허위정보채널” (@JOOONGDO), 905 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JOOONGDO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.