Channel
@chadayevru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
93,706subscribers
+45 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001746605280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chadayevru |
| Description | Тексты, посты и комментарии по актуальным событиям и вечным темам. |
| Created | 16 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chadayevru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 93,706 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 93,698 | +30 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 93,668 | +52 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 93,616 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 93,622 | -32 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 93,654 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:20 | 93,665 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 93,661 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 93,661 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (23 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,440,400 |
| Reactions total | 30,799 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30,094 reactions across 30 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23,984 | 79.7% | |
| 👎 | 6,110 | 20.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,799reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Владимир Александрович! Раз уж Вы записались в мои коллеги по цеху (политологов-комментаторов выборов), вот моё предложение от политолога политологу: чтобы нанести ещё больший когнитивный удар по путинской тирании, внесите инициативным порядком партию Яблоко в бюллетень на выборы в Верховную Раду Украины. Ах, да...
👍792👎14
Кстати, добавлю от себя, всё это было очень полезной историей. В процессе которой мы поняли, что чисто технически можем защитить мероприятие от большинства дистанционных угроз, в меньшей степени, но тоже — и от террористических. Решение о переносе связано не с дефицитом технических возможностей защиты, а с анализом логики принятия решений противником: на их месте в дни слёта мы бы били совсем не по Дроннице. И мы не …
👍477👎2
Внимание ‼️‼️‼️‼️ ОЧЕНЬ ВАЖНО Мы долго готовили 5 Всероссийский Слёт операторов боевых беспилотных систем «Дронница». Он должен был состояться 29–30 августа 2026 в Великом Новгороде Сегодня вынуждены сообщить, что после долгих обсуждений, мы приняли решение отказаться от проведения мероприятия в конкретные даты и в конкретном месте Мы не отменяем «Дронницу 2026», мы её переносим! 🔴Причины нашего решения Аналитич…
👍990👎11
Подкаст Студии Мандельштама «Образы Будущего» — о том, как наука и технологии меняют нашу жизнь. Города будущего — это небоскрёбы, летающие такси и мегаполисы на 50 миллионов человек? Или, наоборот, будущее за частными домам и автономными поселениями? В новом выпуске «Образов будущего» разбираемся, каким может стать город через 20, 50 и 100 лет. Почему мегаполисы продолжают притягивать людей, хотя сама идея огромн…
👍294👎6
Сегодня важный для «Ушкуйника» день. Ровно два года назад на Курском направлении состоялась публичная боевая премьера дрона «Князь Вандал Новгородский». Вот тот самый пост у меня на канале, с роликом, из которого потом уже другие люди напилили мемов, облетевших весь интернет – про пакетик, забытый в «Пятёрочке». Несколько цифр-фактов. 1. Общее соотношение затрат на «Князя» (включая НИОКР, организацию производства,…
👍1,450👎7
Live stream finished (1 hour)
Чат трансляции для ваших вопросов и мыслей
👍176👎8
Live stream started
Начинаем уже через 10 минут. Трансляция будет здесь на канале, а также: YouTube RUTUBE ВК Выбирайте, где удобнее, и встречаемся в 21:00 по Мск
👍224👎8
Сегодня в 21:00 встречаемся в прямом эфире #ЧП вместе с Семёном Ураловым и Иваном Князевым. Тема: Братушки и небратья. Трансляции на наших каналах, YouTube, Rutube и ВК.
👍343👎10
Хороший ролик от НТВ, про некоторые нюансы, которые сорвали планы врага. А напомню, ВСУ в те дни рвались к Курской АЭС, отлично понимая ее важность для своей позиции, возможность шантажировать Россию. Причем подошли основательно, подготовили РЭБ на все частоты, которые тогда были на этом участке фронта, прикрывали машиной с таким РЭБом свои колонны, прорывались в глубь родной русской земли. Конечно хороший вопрос, …
👍1,790👎9
Саша Барашков из Гагаринга — друг, товарищ и умница. Хорошо, что есть те, кто помнят, как что было
👍484👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @chadayevru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,093 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 132 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧАДАЕВ” (@chadayevru), 93,706 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chadayevru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.