Channel
@mif_log
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
205subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001409969941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mif_log |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mif_log |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 205 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 205 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 206 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (4 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 389 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
69 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 44 | 63.8% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 21.7% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 13.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪨 Сегодня об угле. Тут вышло две новости, связанные с отраслью: - во-первых, вчера отчиталась #LANNA Resources. Ситуация улучшилась, а местам улучшилась кардинально - за #2Q26 компания заработала в 2 раза больше, чем в прошлом году. За полугодие ситуация похуже, но поднятие цен на уголь вполне себе подтянуло результаты. Сегодня акции +3%. Но P/E все еще непомерно высок (как по мне), плюс отсутствие каких-то внятных п…
👍2🔥1
🗓 Календарь планируемых дат отчетов компаний, отчеты я которых я жду. Таиланд 04.08 #FTREIT 05.08 #NER 06.08 #NYT 07.08 #DIF, #DMT 7-10.08 #UVAN (четкой даты нет, предполагаемая, исходя из предыдущих лет) 11.08 #AIMRT, #WHAIR, #WHART 13.08 #KBS 14.08 #TFFIF Гонконг 13.08 Kerry Properties 20.08 Sinopec Kantons 25.08 PetroChina 26.08 Shenzhen Expressway, Kinetic Development Group 28.08 Bank of China, Sichuan Expresswa…
🔥2
Итак, начинается сезон отчетов за #2Q26 и #1H26 В пятницу отчиталась #PTTEP За квартал выручка +35% г/г, прибыль грязная (выручка - себестоимость продаж) +70%, прибыль на акцию +100% г/г. Дивиденд объявили скромный, 4.5 бата (при том, что прибыль только за 2й квартал - больше 6 бат на акцию) с див. отсечкой 14 августа и выплатой 28го. Позиция по #PTTEP у меня есть как в личном портфеле, так и в двух управляемых - но …
👍2💯1
Практика показала, что в июне и "крови" то толком не было, так, легкая сукровица :) За июль (последнюю неделю-полторы) я полностью закрыл позицию по #PLZL (цены продажи 1210-1320), позиция продана в небольшой (чуть больше 3% от величины позиции) убыток, на 2/3 от вырученных денег куплен Русагро #RAGR (95.6 - 98.6 за акцию), буду ли при этом выходить на див. отсечку - пока не решил, но текущий рост уже компенсировал у…
👍3🔥3❤1
Исполнить акт максимального унижения в сторону нашего генералитета, с непосредственным skin in the game, и не довести его до конца — я даже не знаю... cложно представить более самоубийственный ход оппонентов. Теперь это прямо личное. А ещё президент говорил про зеркальные ответы, умноженные в разы. Повысилась вероятность, что договариваться о мире с той стороны будут уже совсем другие люди, по причине физической нед…
👍1
В очередной раз хочется напомнить всем, кто рассматривает рынок РФ как место для инвестиций (с такими распродажами, к.м.к., можно либо очень сильно расстроиться и "уйти в запой", забив на инвестиции, либо, наоборот, активнейшим образом докупать по максимуму), что делать это лучше, имея статус квал. инвестора. Получение статуса лучше совместить у нескольких брокеров, чтобы быть максимально защищенным плане возможносте…
👍2❤1
Запись доступна по ссылке: https://disk.yandex.ru/d/l01JMMgtzC-gKg Там отдельно с видео, отдельно - чисто голос.
👍9❤1🔥1
Коллеги, тут оказалось, что в канале не очевидно, как со мной связаться. Вот, цитрую закрепленное сообщение - в самом низу мой ник для прямой связи: https://t.me/martyasha
👍4
Ссылка на телемост: https://telemost.360.yandex.ru/j/9461129954 Собираемся где-то до 14:10 бкк / 10:10 мск.
❤2🔥2
Коллеги, давайте тогда завтра (воскресенье, 28.06), по времени - где-то 10:00 мск / 14:00 Бкк. Либо можно другое время в пределах 2-3 часов в любую из сторон.
👍2❤1🔥1
Появилась идея пообщаться в голосе на тему фондов недвижимости (РФ в первую очередь), их вариантах и разницы между ними. У кого есть интерес?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3🔥2👍1
На рынке последние 2 недели "льется кровь", на этой неделе - особенно сильно. Скорее всего, на следующей неделе буду производить закуп где-то на 5% от портфеля, благо, появилась такая возможность очень вовремя. Есть ощущение, что рынок достиг какого-то уровня равновесия, называть это дном пока не рискну - рынок всегда может отправиться дальше. Но все таки кажется, что распродажа была инициирована деятельностью Алор-а…
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mif_log. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Появилась идея пообщаться в голосе на тему фондов недвижимости (РФ в первую очередь), их вариантах и разницы между ними. У кого есть интерес?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Martianov's Investments Fund” (@mif_log), 205 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mif_log.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.