Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 229 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,459–40,935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 03:17
40,665
-18
8 Nov 2026, 18:05
40,683
-6
7 Nov 2026, 14:48
40,689
-9
6 Nov 2026, 13:17
40,698
-19
5 Nov 2026, 13:21
40,717
-9
4 Nov 2026, 10:47
40,726
+4
3 Nov 2026, 10:16
40,722
+11
2 Nov 2026, 09:09
40,711
-15
1 Nov 2026, 12:26
40,726
-24
31 Oct 2026, 12:37
40,750
-26
30 Oct 2026, 10:55
40,776
+1
29 Oct 2026, 08:28
40,775
-53
28 Oct 2026, 04:19
40,828
-16
27 Oct 2026, 06:30
40,844
+11
26 Oct 2026, 05:40
40,833
+2
25 Oct 2026, 04:26
40,831
+23
24 Oct 2026, 07:20
40,808
-16
23 Oct 2026, 09:36
40,824
-7
22 Oct 2026, 11:31
40,831
-6
20 Oct 2026, 04:30
40,837
first reading
Engagement
295 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 40,665 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,300
104 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
105
of 295 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
295 (2 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
1,281,300
Reactions total
35,936
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 09:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,900
Videos
≈253
Links
≈1,860
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
50m 41s
Average length
2m 12s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
93,395 reactions across 291 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
18,663
20.0%
❤
15,534
16.6%
😁
15,234
16.3%
🤣
9,049
9.69%
💯
8,196
8.78%
🔥
7,294
7.81%
🫡
4,315
4.62%
🤡
3,366
3.60%
😢
2,795
2.99%
❤🔥
2,306
2.47%
👎
1,751
1.87%
🤔
1,333
1.43%
👏
1,002
1.07%
🤬
811
0.868%
🌚
526
0.563%
🗿
523
0.56%
🥰
456
0.488%
⚡
241
0.258%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 294 of the 295 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95,416 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 295 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 294 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @norinea. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 295 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 35 of 105 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎭 Кому достанутся последние экземпляры 30-ки?
Подарки на Новый год лучше планировать уже сейчас, особенно, если речь о «30-летней войне» Норина!
Буквально последние 100 книг ждут своих владельцев, затем тираж уйдёт в допечатку и будет уже весной. Успейте ухватить экземпляр нашего почти раритета.
❤️ Ведь первый тираж — он как первая любовь, уже не повторится…
Купить «30-летнюю войну» Евгения Норина
А у нас небольшой, но хороший, годный релиз.
Владимир Витковский воевал в Гражданскую, а дальше его, как и многих, выбросило в эмиграцию. Воспоминания небольшие, но занятные. Он участвовал в Хорловском десанте - странноватом рейде, одном из последних прорывов белых из Крыма; а затем - во всяческих эмигрантских историях, включая безумный прожект штурма белыми... Константинополя. Ну, и вообще интересный был тип. По сс…
Друзья, задача со звездочкой
Нашему издательству нужен литературный агент для работы с внешними рынками. Задача - продавать книги "ЧС" и "Листвы" иностранным издательствам для перевода (когда это требуется) и публикаций. Нужен именно специалист, знающий рынок и занимающийся такой работой на профессиональной основе. Интересуют все реальные варианты. Писать можно мне - @ea_norin или в редакцию: @Chernaya100konsultant …
" - Вставай, Сова, ты отправляешься на СВО".
Быть может, мне доведется произнести эту фразу, имея в виду... правильно, выносной видеоприемник "Сова". А также систему связи "Кузнечик". Вещи, на самом деле, незаменимые для дроноводов - а ведь именно такие средства наносят противнику наибольшие потери в наше время. И, следовательно, берегут жизни людей.
Чтобы повысить эффективность беспилотников подразделения группиро…
Кстати, польский полицейский, спасший людей от сумасшедшего стрелка без всяких скидок герой, отважный мужик, и дай Бог всякому быть таким в острой ситуации.
А я сразу вспомнил про нашего патрульного Константина Калинина. Дело в том, что я из Перми, и как кто-то, может, помнит, у нас такой же расстрел был в университете. Тот урод пришел с ружьем той же проходной, через которую я ходил пять лет. И остановил его такой ж…
Марк Аврелий очень хороший. Да, продвинутый философ скажет, что "Наедине с собой" это минус первый курс универа, но зато это внятно человеку, который не совсем всю жизнь посвящает симулякрам и дискурсам. И вообще, разумный человек с благоустроенной головой. Соображения универсальные, и не сраться в комментах он, к примеру, рекомендует, не дожив 1800 лет до срача в комментах. Хорошая книжка.
Но я чего заговорил, там …
19-00❗️НОРИН. ИСТОРИЯ | ФОМЕНКО | Битва за Москву
Историк, автор ряда книг, посвященных Великой Отечественной войне Максим Фоменко, и колумнист издания "РЕПОРТЁРЫ" Евгений НОРИН @norinea разговаривают о немецкой операции "Тайфун" и битве за Москву.
Смотрите эфир в VK Видео
Смотрите эфир на RuTube
Смотрите эфир на YouTube
◾️Как удалось восстановить фронт после его крушения в октябре?
◾️Была ли предрешена победа, и…
❗️В России утвердили отдельный ГОСТ на дирижабли
Он вступит в силу 1 февраля 2027 года. Стандарт установит технические требования к дирижаблям мягкой, полумягкой, полужёсткой и жёсткой конструкции, их компонентам и наземной инфраструктуре.
Гибридные модели, включая вертостаты и планостаты, в документ не вошли.
Кстати, оказывается, сняли сериал про Тоцкий полигон. Я не смотрел, зато я уже про это писал!
"Район взрыва представлял собой зрелище не для слабонервных. Трава, кустарники — все горело; деревья были расщеплены и изломаны. Техника, оставленная в эпицентре без экипажей, была уничтожена, взрывная волна переворачивала даже танки. Все было в дыму пожаров.
На следующий день нас, офицеров, повезли в район эпицентра взрыв…
Князь Дмитрий Михайлович Пожарский нашелся, и арт-объект поедет в Нижегородскую область.
Тем временем сборы продолжаются. На этот раз бойцы группировки "Днепр" хотят усилители и шифраторы сигнала для более эффективной работы БПЛА. Чем точнее, чаще и ловчее бьет дрон, тем больше жизней людей спасено. Арифметика простая.
В дело идет каждый рубль
4276380188155837 - Сергей.
🔥48👍15❤9🤡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 295 posts we hold for @norinea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@norinea edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
31 October 2026
Most recent edit
31 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @norinea as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
16 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 61 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 79 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CatNews @cat0news · 19,454 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 October 2026
Комиссар Исчезает @komissarischezaet · 30,985 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
ЦИФРОВАЯ ИСТОРИЯ – Егор Яковлев @egoryakovleff · 61,629 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Vault 8. Убежище №8. @vault8pro · 40,347 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
Александр Пелевин Z @comradepelevin · 19,905 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
Историк Дюков @historiographe · 53,151 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Новости истории и археологии @arch_history_news · 25,036 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
ЛЕДОРУБ @elpicahielo · 20,021 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
историк-алкоголик @istrkalkglk · 123,361 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Стальной шлем @stahlhelm · 20,635 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
Василий Тополев @vasil_topolev · 44,513 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Обыкновенный царизм @ordinaryczarizm · 43,501 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Zlawyers. Русские юристы @zlawyers · 26,873 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 September 2026
Д///ИХАД @tvjihad · 123,159 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
Картавых Александр @AlexCarrier · 145,040 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
ИА "Стекломой" @ia_steklomoy · 108,641 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
История и истории @historygothy · 20,837 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
Григорий Баженов @furydrops · 28,184 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
Лина Булатникова🤍 Помощь фронту💙Дроны "Мурз"❤️Стримы @reihatori · 21,622 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
ЧАДАЕВ @chadayevru · 100,847 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Филолог в засаде @philologist_zov · 59,050 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
/po мемы @po_memes · 66,551 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 21 August 2026
Долгарева • Река Смородина @dolgarevaanna · 28,305 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Саша Конь @sashakon · 132,840 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 92 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Норин” (@norinea), 40,665 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/norinea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.