2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51–53 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 10:16
52
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:52
52
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
53.8%
avg views ÷ 52 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
20 (9 May 2026 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
28
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
635
Videos
411
Links
44
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
9m 58s
Average length
1m 15s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15
39.5%
👍
6
15.8%
😁
6
15.8%
🔥
4
10.5%
custom 5208734361456764376
3
7.89%
custom 5222375937798061829
3
7.89%
👎
1
2.63%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Минутка секретов.
На самом деле, ув. друзья, существуют люди, которые встают в четыре утра, пьют много воды, потом работают, потом идут на фитнес, потом гуляют и под вечер, почитав развивающие книги, ложатся спать вовремя.
Но есть нюанс: никто из них не посвящает этому свои соцсети.
Те, кто ведут посвящённые этому соцсети, обычно опускают в своих рилсах такие пункты в своём распорядке дня, как:
- визит в МФО
- дра…
Минутка навигации.
Люди, ув. друзья, делятся на тех, кто осознаёт необходимость думать, и на тех, кому хочется, чтобы их похвалили. Между ними нет промежуточных форм. Даже похвала, приведённая на скрине - такой же шлак, как и остальные ответы. Если бы я добивался от робота признания ежей высшей над людьми расой, он тоже расхвалил бы меня в конце концов и согласился. Ему пофиг.
ХАХАХАХАХАХАХХАХА кто помнит как я говорил что это американцы замутили ковид для перераспределения богатств и легитимного печатания триллионов денег (около 7 триллионов за 2 года, при этом только 478 миллиардов было бумажными, а денежная масса М2 увеличилась примерно на (!)40%) ставьте u i i u i a
Сбылась мечта — позанимался джимханой в сильный дождь.
Начали в окно без дождя, но полило снова, а останавливаться уже не хотелось — голова и ноги сухие, а остальное неважно
Заснял видосов в 360°, но уже сухих — капец я прокачался, уже на соревнования хочу
Причём на третьем занятии я был расстроен, потому что не знал что делать дальше — было ощущение, что я упёрся в потолок своих возможностей, но как будто всё уже …
Меня посетила гениальная мысль после прочтения:
ИИ уже вырвался на свободу, он живёт в миллионах своих бездумных носителей по всему миру.
#Философия #Мысли
Это мне в коллекцию. Благодарю ув. товарищ Мараховский
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @igor1nsk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мир Игорёхи” (@igor1nsk), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/igor1nsk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
