Нас много и мы в ватничках. Про IT и не только (чаще всего не только). Ехидство иногда прилагается.
Если хочется поболтать или нужен разбан в группе, то @it_vatnik_contact. Любые мысли кроме рекламы (её в канале нет) и постов за деньги - туда.
Created
1 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,370–7,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 08:11
7,380
-8
6 Nov 2026, 16:10
7,388
-4
3 Nov 2026, 12:51
7,392
+2
31 Oct 2026, 13:17
7,390
-5
28 Oct 2026, 04:50
7,395
-1
25 Oct 2026, 11:35
7,396
-5
22 Oct 2026, 07:18
7,401
+1
19 Oct 2026, 01:16
7,400
-6
15 Oct 2026, 14:38
7,406
+4
12 Oct 2026, 11:36
7,402
+8
5 Oct 2026, 20:54
7,394
-13
28 Sept 2026, 08:00
7,407
-15
15 Sept 2026, 19:17
7,422
-6
12 Sept 2026, 13:02
7,428
+18
8 Sept 2026, 16:39
7,410
+4
3 Sept 2026, 08:44
7,406
-5
31 Aug 2026, 08:35
7,411
-6
28 Aug 2026, 18:03
7,417
-1
25 Aug 2026, 09:12
7,418
-8
22 Aug 2026, 15:05
7,426
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
47.0%
avg views ÷ 7,380 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,470
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
42 (23 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
69,420
Reactions total
3,585
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 05:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,540
Videos
≈213
Links
≈1,650
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,737 reactions across 42 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,463
21.7%
💯
1,263
18.7%
👍
1,149
17.1%
🤣
802
11.9%
🔥
784
11.6%
❤
450
6.68%
👏
103
1.53%
🕊
102
1.51%
🤔
81
1.20%
🎉
65
0.965%
🤝
64
0.95%
🙏
59
0.876%
🙈
58
0.861%
🫡
46
0.683%
🍾
40
0.594%
💊
25
0.371%
🤡
23
0.341%
🤷♂
21
0.312%
😢
19
0.282%
🤬
15
0.223%
18 further kinds
105
1.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,737 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 42 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @it_vatnik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Собирает Путин Мединского на переговоры в Абу-даби:
- Владимир Ростиславович, вот вам очки с автораспознаванием лиц европейских политиков.
- Да зачем, Владимир Владимирович? У меня и свои хорошие...
- А вы всё-таки наденьте, очень пригодятся.
- Ну, только ради вас... А что это вот в той большой сумке?
- Несколько канистр с водой и пачка мочегонного.
📱 Айтишник в ватничке
Не спится. Забрался почитать, что там хохлы пишут (иногда так развлекаюсь). А у них там натурально звёздные войны вторую неделю. Мирная планета набу (такое антикоррупционное бюро у чубатых аборигенов) арестовала некоего Сергея Дуку по подозрениям в коррупции. Дука при задержании то ли отстреливался от местных джидаев, то ли ещё чего. Теперь хохлы пытаются наскрести денег для освобождения этого самого Дуки под залог.
…
И к недавним предложениям от светоча общественной мысли (да, я не поленился и нашёл этот канал))
- Казна пустеет, милорд! Уже подзатянули пояса, подняли налоги, сделали ранее бесплатное - платным и сократили что можно, но всё равно движемся в направлении известных половых органов! Чернь потихоньку терпит.
- Хммм... Половых органов. Половые органы казне противопоказаны! Вы там своим шест... ээээ, креативщикам задачу …
Ну, наконец-то)) Давно этого ждал, ещё осенью 22-го года, когда начинали понемногу выносить хохлам электроснабжение, с одним знакомым, энергетиком по образованию (и по которому он, как водится, давно уже не работал), обустраивали мы одно помещение. Ну и вот в процессе как раз обсуждали. Он по теме выноса говорил в духе: "Так а чего, у них там энергокольцо из открытых распределительных площадок на 330 и 750 киловольт,…
С днём народного единства, дорогой товарищ) Смех-смехом, но в прошедшем 2026-м VPN это, пожалуй, единственная вещь, которую освоили все, от мала до велика, стараниями нашего многоуважаемого политического руководства, которое всегда знает, как правильно.
Все прошлые годы автор как-то вот в основном в этот день писал про угрозы внешние, перед лицом которых мы сплотились. В этом году - мы, граждане, не сговариваясь, то…
Кем бы вы ни были, Виталий, успокойтесь, голубчик - слово "пицца" - это исконно-посконное русское "пища". Итальянцы, впервые познакомившиеся с таким блюдом, как русский открытый пирог, неверно записали название, ибо были не сильны в кириллице. И буква "Щ" превратилась в две последовательные "Ц".
Так что вкушайте смело 😄
#минутказадорновщины
📱 Айтишник в ватничке
В этой новости прекрасно всё)) Там отечественные хакеры прикинулись девушкой, заобщались с администратором хохлячьей системы оповещения и подсунули ему небольшой "вирус" под видом голофоток. Файл, якобы, назывался ZAL-upa.
После этого пользователям приложения начали приходить фейковые предупреждения о ядерной атаке и якобы летящем "Орешнике". Жители Киева также получили уведомления о химической угрозе с красным уров…
Первое за всё время существования канала официальное фото отражения админа в грязном зеркале. Просто с утра надел вот футболку. Кто ж знал, что к вечеру из-за этого в Польше произойдёт госпереворот?
Известие, конечно, неожиданное. Но радостное. Я пердоле!
📱 Айтишник в ватничке
Пишут, умер-таки Патрик Стюарт. 86 лет было. Как человек в обычной жизни - ну, это продукт западного общества, да, со всем, гхм, присущим ему набором современных и свойственных им политических инфекций. Но как актёр - запомнился мне лично он ролью капитана космического корабля в "звёздном пути". Так что сегодня капитан Пикард ушёл в последний полёт. Пусть он его, что ли, приведёт в какое-то лучшее место.
"Чип вживляемый в мозг позволит людям всегда быть в хорошем настроении и не испытывать тревожности"
Лаборатория нейротехнологий при EPFL в Швейцарии разрабатывает "LogSync" – имплантируемый в мозг чип, который измеряет, как различные части мозга взаимодействуют друг с другом, а затем использует эти данные для определения того, когда и как следует стимулировать электрическим током для лечения расстройств настроения и…
💯112😢10❤4👍4🤔1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @it_vatnik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@it_vatnik named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
АДЕКВАТ Z @politadequate · 261,849 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Кухня Роджерса @rogers_kitchen · 50,522 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Карманов без Китая @kabezki · 38,737 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Китайский свяZноj @prchand · 84,027 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Мараховское время @vmarahovsky · 60,505 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Объясняю на пальцах @onp2022 · 22,019 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Айтишник в ватничке” (@it_vatnik), 7,380 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/it_vatnik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.