Channel
@aleksandr_skif
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
317,778subscribers
-341 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001100942646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aleksandr_skif |
| Created | 29 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aleksandr_skif |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 317,778 | -55 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 317,833 | -50 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 317,883 | -54 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 317,937 | -55 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 317,992 | -56 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 318,048 | -40 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 318,088 | -31 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 318,119 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 318,119 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (10 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,368,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Разговоры о невозможности стабилизировать политическую Украину, не прибегая к внешнему управлению, выраженному в той или иной форме, рождаются не на пустом месте. Понимая тот факт, что Украина с первых шагов своего современного "самостоятельного" существования попала в критическую зависимость от внешних игроков, - рассуждать можно только о том, кто возьмет на себя функцию "управляющей кампании". С одной стороны, пост…
Ни одно наше действие не может быть оправдано политическими или техническими соображениями. В области что политики, что насущных потребностей нам не нужен ни один кусок из тех территорий, которые некогда были щедрою рукою втиснуты в политический проект "Украина". Никогда бы мы не развязали войну ради сухопутного коридора в Крым, расширения ЛДНР до размеров бывших областей или превращения Азовского моря во внутреннее …
Если отсеять детали и подробности, оставив только интонации, - то не сложно заметить, как по мере пролонгации войны менялость отношение к Украине в российском общественном сознании. Первичное отношение к послемайданной Украине строилось на том, что украинцы - это русские, ставшие жертвой исторического эксперимента и попавшие под влияние "иноагентов", которые взяли курс на антиРоссию и потащили в эту пропасть не очен…
Правильный во всех смыслах текст написал вчера Дима Стешин. Все, кто следит за его публикациями - едкими и бескомпромиссными - даже слегка были удивлены тональностью.... Должны ли мы интересоваться тем, как война прокатывается по стране, ставшей нашим противником, - читать сводки потерь среди некомбатантов в результате нашего воздействия, например? И делать это не в качестве профессионалов, а как люди, которые хотят …
Все видели съемку из Геленджика, как дрон атакует людей на пляже. Повторять нет смысла. Первая реакция, почти у каждого - бешенство, жажда мести, отплатить той же монетой, той же мерой. Без разбора. По пляжам Одессы, днем! "Искандером!". Я очень много прочитал такого в первые часы после трагедии. И очень трудно объяснить, почему так сделать нельзя, почему мы не имеем такого морального права. Где находится стопор, как…
Снова кого-то обвинили, снова кого-то лишили свободы, - приняты очередные меры по наказанию виновных в зарабатывании на военных потребностях. Многих уже наказали за многое, но очень мало чего-либо пресекли и предотвратили до того, как деньги из бюджета переместились в частные руки. Даже если с конфискацией - это не компенсирует и пяти процентов государственных потерь на махинациях с деньгами, предназначенными для вой…
"Кому война - кому мать родна"... Сколько столетий этой поговорке? Широк человек... В чем советская система была честнее любых других систем, подразумевающих получение прибыли даже в условиях войны, а часто именно благодаря войне? Когда рекрутов стали покупать единовременными выплатами и жалованьем - диссонанс сколько-нибудь поуменьшился по сравнению с периодом, когда основной движущей силой были "регуляры" и "мобики…
Поздравляю Игоря Григорьевича Ефремова с выдвижением в кандидаты Государственной Думы от Хакасии и надеюсь на его успех на выборах. Мой опыт общения с товарищем кандидатом говорит о том, что такие люди во власти нам очень нужны. Скажу об одном поступке: на момент начала частичной мобилизации Игорь Григорьевич работал в Правительстве Хакасии. По возрасту он мобилизации не подлежал. Но, понаблюдав ее ход, он решил пойт…
"Досадно мне, что слово честь забыто, и что в чести наветы за глаза... " " Приемлем всё, что в жизни есть - смеемся, радуемся, плачем... А как же совесть, как же честь, - неужто цену им назначим? "... Такое звучало в позднесоветское время, как ностальгия по временам, когда вопросы чести были основными поводами для вызовов на дуэли. " Честь имею! " - один из речевых оборотов, - но сколько в нём смысла! Когда-то это б…
У Симонова в "Живых и мёртвых" Синцова - одного из главных героев - после ранения из комбатов определили офицером оперативного отдела штаба. Одной из его задач была проверка верности данных о занимаемых рубежах, которые боевые подразделения подавали в штаб. Синцов должен был на брюхе проползать передний край и убедиться, что наши позиции находятся именно там, где и обозначены на карте, и что наши командиры не приврал…
Большое спасибо, друзья, за помощь в приобретении необходимого оборудования. От лица бойцов низкий поклон!
Наверное, не будет преувеличением сказать, что в военном деле произошла революция. Беспилотники - это не просто одно из эффективных средств поражения, - это новая реальность. Эта реальность затрагивает не только сферу боевых действий, но и сферу человеческого сознания. Теперь можно, сидя в безопасности в Киеве, управлять дронами на линии соприкосновения, не опасаясь возмездия, - это качественно меняет восприятие войн…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @aleksandr_skif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@aleksandr_skif edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 5,942 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 81 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
7 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Alexander Khodakovsky |
|---|---|
| Description | former Ukrainian military and politician from Donetsk People's Republic |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Hacker News
This handle was named 4 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Александр Ходаковский” (@aleksandr_skif), 317,778 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aleksandr_skif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.