справочник по ресурсам - https://t.me/angrybonds/14019
обратная связь - @patsak9876,
РКН - https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67379d8f23bfbf2cbf460070®istryType=bloggersPermission
Ничто не ИИР на данном канале.
Created
15 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,140–24,179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:44
24,174
+13
11 Aug 2026, 14:42
24,161
-1
10 Aug 2026, 15:51
24,162
+18
9 Aug 2026, 17:23
24,144
-8
8 Aug 2026, 14:05
24,152
+4
7 Aug 2026, 17:13
24,148
-6
6 Aug 2026, 20:21
24,154
-7
6 Aug 2026, 02:03
24,161
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:16
24,161
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 24,174 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,990
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.903%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
49 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
195,410
Reactions total
1,764
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,890
Videos
≈96
Links
≈9,580
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 52s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,450 reactions across 41 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
383
26.4%
👍
298
20.6%
🤔
205
14.1%
🔥
145
10.0%
❤
123
8.48%
👌
54
3.72%
👀
45
3.10%
💯
43
2.97%
👏
28
1.93%
✍
26
1.79%
😭
25
1.72%
🤷♂
15
1.03%
🙉
14
0.966%
👻
11
0.759%
⚡
8
0.552%
🤝
7
0.483%
🤯
5
0.345%
🗿
4
0.276%
🏆
3
0.207%
🤪
3
0.207%
3 further kinds
5
0.345%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,764reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 49 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @angrybonds. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Любопытное явление происходит на российском валютном рынке. Сейчас объясним, но сначала внимание на график. Там две линии: бирюзовая — это курс доллара к рублю, и серая — индекс доллара США (DXY). Сразу бросается в глаза, что между двумя линиями в 2024 и 2025 годах была довольно тесная и прямая корреляция. Рост индекса DXY, отражающий укрепление доллара к корзине из шести основных мировых валют, сопровождался ослабле…
Похоже одним "дивидендным аристократом" скоро станет меньше.
Там ещё поди оферта миноритариям возникает обязательная. С "сюрпризами" не исключено.
Подробнее - см у Ярослава Кабакова
#долговой_коллапс
Дефицит бюджета США уверенно подбирается к $2 трлн.
А помните сколько в прошлом году было разговоров о том, что его сократят?
Ну вот и сократили...
Я в целом так и думал, не потому что у меня есть магическЫй шар, а потому что твёрдо выучил первое правило госфинансов: сначала сделал, потом рассказал. Если сначала рассказал, то ничего и не выйдет, либо и не собирались достигать вовсе.
Переходя на н…
Коллега Волков формулирует
Старая глобализация экономила капитал. Новая реглобализация будет его пожирать.
Я бы уточнил, сначала сэкономила (года до 2000-го), а потом стала проедать.
Что есть крипта/майнинг, "энергопереход" или ИИ-хайп как не растрата в особо крупных размерах, когда нишевое решение стараются натянуть на весь глобус, невзирая на экономику, физику и здравый смысл.
То есть пожирание началось с бума дот…
#вестисполейАрмагеддонщины
А вот на контрасте эссе о "ревущем" рынке госдолга.
Вставлю 5 копеек: честно говоря, весь "ужас-ужас" этот решается просто и даже в чем-то элегантно - все крупные должники одновременно объявляют дефолт и выкидывают на помойку Базель. Разрубаем Гордиев узел.
Биржу закрывают на пару недель или на месяц, делают клининг, то есть я хотел сказать клиринг и можно продолжать дальше в целом то.
Да у…
#вестисполейАрмагеддонщины
"Ревущие двадцатые" - красивая метафора. Более того, если получится быстро и качественно обезжирить Европу, то она вполне имеет шансы на повторение.
И с точки зрения длинных циклов по фен-шую: 100-летняя военно-политическая гегемония США по краям (вернее со сдвигом в 10 лет вправо) оконтурена биржевым бумом и последующим кризисом.
Другое дело что "рёв" в этот раз может оказаться нескольк…
Говорил же - Дойче банк ещё простудится на похоронах его многолетних хейтеров.
Не то, чтобы он очень надежный, но ...китайцы подсуетились и дело скорее всего не только в клиринге. Полагаю, скоро узнаем, что они и в капитал вошли прилично.
#битва_пузырей
Если под это дело собрали синдикат - значит деньги заканчиваются, по одиночке уже закрыть книгу не получается.
500 млрд. видимо на рынке просто нет свободных.
А тут еще казначейство пылесосит как может
#стройка
Малодушно избегаю спекуляций в Самолете.
Просто исходя из того, что какие бы там акционеры ни были геморрой никуда не денется. Как в АФК и в МВидео, собственно. ОлегПалыч прав - чего возбудились не ясно.
Но в общем дело обычное "возбудились и возбудились". Шортистов порвали немного.
#ГОЭЛРО_2
ИнтерРАО у меня не было уже года полтора или два, и видимо не зря.
В энергетике сейчас вообще всё сложно, кроме, прости господи, "дивидендных аристократов" сетевиков, которым (как и ВТБ) деваться некуда, надо платить каждый год.
Вообще, я опасаюсь, что в связи с и изменениями и в вооружениях и в ИИ этом богомерзком ТЭКу придется поневоле перестраиваться в ближайшие 5 лет, и в безусловном плюсе тут будут то…
🤔14👍8❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @angrybonds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 23,573 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Кримсон Дайджест @crimsondigest · 139,981 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
ВТБ Моя Аналитика @omyinvestments · 212,989 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“angry bonds” (@angrybonds), 24,174 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angrybonds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.