Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Angry Bonds

Channel

Angry Bonds

@angrybonds

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,215subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001373518643
TypeChannel
Username@angrybonds
Descriptionсправочник по ресурсам - https://t.me/angrybonds/14019 обратная связь - @patsak9876, РКН - https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67379d8f23bfbf2cbf460070&registryType=bloggersPermission Ничто не ИИР на данном канале.
Created15 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/angrybonds

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “angry bonds” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

24,14424,25424,1996 August 2026 — 24,161 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,161 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,154 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,148 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,152 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,144 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,162 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,161 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,174 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,169 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,177 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,178 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,199 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,202 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,231 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,234 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,254 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,245 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,251 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,254 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,247 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,246 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,249 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,241 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,238 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,228 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,217 subscribers5 September 2026 — 24,206 subscribers9 September 2026 — 24,205 subscribers11 September 2026 — 24,203 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,217 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,207 subscribers16 September 2026 — 24,217 subscribers19 September 2026 — 24,201 subscribers25 September 2026 — 24,215 subscribers24,2156 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,128–24,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 19:2024,215+14
19 Sept 2026, 00:3724,201-16
16 Sept 2026, 17:4024,217+10
14 Sept 2026, 22:4224,207-10
13 Sept 2026, 10:1724,217+14
11 Sept 2026, 17:1624,203-2
9 Sept 2026, 05:0024,205-1
5 Sept 2026, 19:5924,206-11
3 Sept 2026, 16:3924,217-11
2 Sept 2026, 09:4924,228-10
1 Sept 2026, 12:4424,238-3
31 Aug 2026, 10:5624,241-8
30 Aug 2026, 10:3324,249+3
29 Aug 2026, 11:4824,246-1
28 Aug 2026, 11:5724,247-7
27 Aug 2026, 09:5724,254+3
26 Aug 2026, 08:3824,251+6
25 Aug 2026, 05:1824,245-9
24 Aug 2026, 06:4424,254+20
22 Aug 2026, 11:4424,234first reading

Engagement

179 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 24,215 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,380
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 179 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held179 (2 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total169,018
Reactions total1,841
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 12:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,990
Videos
≈97
Links
≈9,760

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 52s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,746 reactions across 168 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,34623.4%
🤣1,32923.1%
🤔67711.8%
❤4948.60%
💯4367.59%
🔥3976.91%
👀2314.02%
✍1572.73%
👏1131.97%
👌991.72%
🤪560.975%
🤬520.905%
🙉490.853%
😭470.818%
🤯380.661%
👻360.627%
⚡330.574%
😎310.54%
🗿300.522%
🍾290.505%
6 further kinds661.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 177 of the 179 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,060 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 179 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
67
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 179 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
60
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @angrybonds. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 179 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.12%
2 of 179 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,420
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,820
over 177 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnje1TNuZ114 August 202614 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqDrrP1LrgQUJziqcCz5qqQUVTrAQ92gLk8PKa127 August 202627 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 179 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,280 views12 reactionsread 27 September 2026

#гнетущее_ДКП #партизанская_макроаналитика Пропустил я этот пост - уже неделю почти назад вышел. Цитата из рецензии (от профессора Абрамова) В статье речь идет о простых и серьезных вещах от экономиста, занимающегося моделями влияния ДКП на инфляцию. Вот, что он пишет. Существует богатый опыт наблюдений. Центральные банки повышают процентные ставки. Курс национальной валюты растет, а спрос и инфляция снижаются. Одн…

👍5✍3❤2🤔1🤣1

27 Sept 2026, 07:19 UTC≈1,720 views18 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

#анонс Честно сказать,я даже не знаю, как рекламировать конференцию Смартлаба. За столько лет уже все перепробовали. 🎓 Скажу так - там надо просто быть. Иначе жизнь будет неполной и пресной. Итак: ⏱️ дата 31 октября 2026 года 🏢 место - Москва, Новый Арбат 24 💰 Билеты вот тут - https://confa.smart-lab.ru/msk26/ 🍾 промокод вот тут - ANGRY - минус 20% для подписчиков канала. ‼️ Щелкать клювом не рекомендуется - ски…

🗿9🤣5👍2❤1🍾1

26 Sept 2026, 16:12 UTC≈2,690 views16 reactionsread 27 September 2026

#долговой_коллапс Профицит бюджета США в конце 90-х - это как снижение розничных цен при Сталине в 1952 году, или планы отмены платы за проезд в общественном транспорте при Хрущеве в 1961 году - ситуационный казус, которому теперь уделяют непропорционально много внимания и периодически пытаются натянуть парочку сов на глобус. Уж всерьёз строить какие то концепции, отталкиваясь от данного факта точно не стоит.

💯11👌2👍2❤1

26 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC≈2,880 views24 reactionsread 27 September 2026

#поменяйте_керенки "Несуществующая" инфляция издержек опять подняла свою буйную голову, на сей раз в ЖКХ. Ну и в электроэнергетике тоже, правда чуть раньше. Кстати именно рост тарифов ЖКХ, наряду с ростом налогов может понизить инвестиционную привлекательность и депозитов и бетона одновременно. Такая вот понимаешь загогулина. Хотя я думаю, что бетон не сдастся - народ все равно будет покупать метры гектары на всё с…

💯14❤4👍3🤔3

26 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC≈3,010 views20 reactionsread 27 September 2026

#ВДО Похоже не только облигационеров "Евротранса" но и залоговых кредиторов (если таковые существуют) ждет неприятный сюрприз. Пришел лесник и всех разогнал. Хотя концептуально национализация тут должна была быть так или иначе - все таки в духе времени.

🔥13🤔7

26 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC≈2,890 views36 reactionsread 27 September 2026

#наукадоказала Опять как то все с ног на голову: Америка растет быстрее всех потому что прибыльнее. Про распределение добавленной стоимости ни слова. И про международное разделение труда, закрепляемое военно-политическими средствами. Ну нет, так нет) Что более пугает, даже если США утратят своё военно-политическое доминирование и система разделения труда поменяется, лет через 30-40-50 всё равно найдутся таланты кот…

💯23👍4🤔4🤣4❤1

26 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈3,300 views4 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Каждые несколько лет на рынке меняется значительная часть частных инвесторов. Люди приходят за доходностью, совершают примерно один и тот же набор ошибок, получают результат сильно хуже ожидаемого и в итоге уходят. И дело далеко не всегда в неудачном выборе конкретной бумаги. 29 сентября в 19:00 Алексей Бачеров, Илья Гадаскин и Евгений Ерофеев проведут открытый мастер-класс «Почему инвесторы теряют деньги на бирже?…

🤔4

25 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC≈3,480 views42 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @yivashchenkoPhoto

#Макро ⚠️ MOVE взлетел на 33% за два дня. Это уже серьезно Индекс волатильности трежерис за пару дней показал взрывной рост. И вот почему на это стоит смотреть внимательнее, чем на любые макроцифры. Трежерис - это не просто актив. Это фундамент всей финансовой системы: залог в тысячах сделок, база для оценки стоимости заимствований государств и корпораций, основа глобальных расчетов и безрисковый ориентир для всех…

🤔17👍9❤6🔥5👀2🤝2🙉1

25 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC≈3,510 views99 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Ян Арт - мы в царстве лгунов. Все мы в царстве лгунов: от регулятора до инвесторов. Ф цитатник: У корруционеров регулярно обнаруживают недвижимость, золото, антиквариат, но ни у одного корруционера ещё не нашли ЦФА и структурные облигации

🤣51💯41😎5🙊2

25 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈3,630 views47 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Инициатива Минфина РФ по изменению налогообложения паевых инвестиционных фондов касается только закрытых и интервальных фондов, предназначенных для квалифицированных инвесторов, сообщил "Интерфаксу" источник, знакомый с проектом соответствующих поправок в Налоговый кодекс. https://www.interfax.ru/business/1118429 Вовремя опомнились?

👍21🤣12🤔8🗿4🙏2

25 Sept 2026, 11:43 UTC≈3,920 views28 reactionsread 27 September 2026

#креатифф Уж что-то в а PR американцы умеют как никто. Минфин СЩА готов был выкупить 6 млрд., а принесли только 4 млрд. И это второй раз! Очевидное свидетельство что Америка стронг! Что за бумаги и по какой цене предлагали купить - история умалчивает, а проверять и вникать никто не полезет. В целом нам тоже надо брать на вооружение: Росимущество 4 раза не могло продать ЮГК - это ли не свидетельство того, что на рын…

🤣23🔥3💯2

25 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC≈4,490 views17 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Мы же поговорили про дефолты: в целом ясно что регуляторику надо менять, но это по прежнему будет тактика "малых дел". На революцию и Chapter 11 никто не готов. Ну пусть так: лучше чем ничего. Запись наверное будет позже выложена, ссылку дам.

👍11❤3🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 179 posts we hold for @angrybonds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@angrybonds edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTCAnonymous Poll859 voters

Проблема долга США

  1. Весьма серьёзна, пора разваливать ЕС37%
  2. Развал ЕС уже не поможет21%
  3. Америка стронг, ничего страшного не будет18%
  4. Да не поймешь их, может вообще простят друг другу долги и начнут по новой43%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTCAnonymous Poll669 voters

Превзойдут ли рептилоиды из Антропос старину Илона

  1. Да, пипл схавает49%
  2. Нет, Илон неповторим36%
  3. Они не успеют выйти, пузырь схлопнется21%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 179 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Мятежный капитализм
@moi_misli_vslukh · 12,872
#1
Собачье сердце
@MarketHeart · 5,495
#2
Инфляционный шок!
@inflation_shock · 39,925
#3
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 336,911
#4
Кримсон Дайджест
@crimsondigest · 141,439
#5
Манька Аблигация
@marythebond · 44,599
#6
НЕБАФФЕТТ
@thefinansist · 17,499
#7
Политическая П
@politpe · 1,355
#8
Банкста
@banksta · 438,371
#9
ЗЛОЙ ФИНАНСИСТ 😡
@finpizdec · 54,789
#10
ФИНАНСОВЫЕ ДУМКИ
@MarketDumki · 51,866
#11
Грокс
@groks · 42,867
#12
Сигналы РЦБ
@cbrstocks · 117,553
#13
Мазуты сухопутные
@mazuts_ru · 3,746
#14
MMI
@russianmacro · 102,636
#15
TruEcon
@truecon · 26,540
#16
РынкиДеньгиВласть | РДВ
@AK47pfl · 115,554
#17
ХОЛОДНЫЙ РАСЧЕТ ∅ 🇷🇺
@c0ldness · 13,690
#18
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции
@tuzov_invest · 27,614
#19
Proeconomics
@proeconomics · 68,532
#20
СМАРТЛАБ
@smartlabnews · 76,417
#21
Frank Media Invest
@fm_invest · 10,175
#22
bitkogan
@bitkogan · 259,899
#23
Bonds lab ⚗️
@Bonds_lab · 15,081
#24
Ассоциация инвесторов «АВО»
@Bondholders · 26,123
#25
Cbonds
@cbonds · 34,855
#26
Тихие деньги: рынки и инвестиции
@silenceandmoney · 8,253
#27
Truevalue
@truevalue · 14,021
#28
СМАРТЛАБ НОВОСТИ
@newssmartlab · 64,210
#29
Олег Кузьмичев
@kuzmlab · 23,332
#30
usertrader
@usertrader3 · 13,572
#31
Корпоративные облигации | Открытый канал
@corpbonds · 14,683
#32
PRObonds | Иволга Капитал
@probonds · 30,304
#33
Волк с Мосбиржи 🐺
@moexwolf · 26,216
#34
LadimirKapital
@LadimirKapital · 12,520
#35
Верным курсом
@vestifinance_ru · 14,736
#36
Bloomberg
@BIoomberg · 72,942
#37
хроники пикирующего капитализма
@nepmansky · 12,684
#38
Банк России
@centralbank_russia · 244,199
#39
bitkogan⚡️HOTLINE
@bitkogan_hotline · 83,537
#40
Мозоль от каски (Чорный саморез)
@mozol_angry · 920
#41
Хулиномика
@hoolinomics · 99,238
#42
War, Wealth & Wisdom
@warwisdom · 10,658
#43
Т-Инвестиции
@tb_invest_official · 528,596
#44
Frank Media
@frank_media · 31,955
#45
Вредный Инвестор
@harmfulinvestor · 30,846
#46
MarketOverview
@MarketOverview · 46,222
#47
Устойчивый Коллапс
@sustaincoll · 1,899
#48
ДОХОДЪ
@dohod · 70,328
#49
Unexpected Value
@unexpectedvalue · 9,052
#50
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 131,291
#51
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,690
#52
Мараховское время
@vmarahovsky · 60,724
#53
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402
#54
Буратино vs МаркетМейкер
@buratinovsmm · 3,914
#55
Оцифрованный схоласт
@ID_sholast_ID · 829
#56
Тимофей Мартынов
@martynovtim · 35,988
#57
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 671,042
#58
Flipper's place
@true_flipper · 17,643
#59
headlines
@headlines_for_traders · 115,317
#60
Графономика
@topinfographic · 20,041
#61
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 920,149
#62
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,305
#63
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 277,422
#64
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 425,302
#65
PRO облигации
@pro_bonds · 7,324
#66
Я Стокпикер
@IAmStockPicker · 3,828
#67
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 456,385
#68
Win-Win
@victorstepanych · 155,943
#69
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,041,345
#70
МИГ России
@mig41 · 480,324
#71
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 905,528
#72
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 491,085
#73
Digital Доктор
@tlgdoc · 29,407
#74
Китайский свяZноj
@prchand · 84,372
#75
Alfa Wealth
@alfawealth · 55,889
#76
историк-алкоголик
@istrkalkglk · 122,253
#77
Vernikov100 - инвестирование
@vernikov_andrei_1 · 17,169
#78
Trade Talk
@trade_talk_tech · 5,486
#79
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,880
#80
Образ будущего
@obrazbuduschego2 · 165,087
#81
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,696,520
#82
Ватфор | Автострадный think tank
@vatfor · 31,714
#83
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 493,692
#84
Грязь, долги и инвестиции | Сергей Таболин
@unsaid_and_dirty · 15,209
#85
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,024
#86
НЕЗЫГАРЬ
@russicaru · 430,325
#87
Агаев Мурад / Russian Magellan
@russianmagellan · 17,199
#88
Капитал
@sgcapital · 19,226
#89
Цифровой капитализм
@digitalcapitalism · 3,560
#90
Полевой
@dmitrypolevoy · 4,454
#91
Коты и кошка Крамника
@kramnikcat · 39,195
#92
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 747,495
#93
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 527,032
#94
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 250,578
#95
Чванство
@chvans · 15,208
#96

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Инфляционный шок!
@inflation_shock · 39,925
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
PRObonds | Иволга Капитал
@probonds · 30,304
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 7 September 2026
Кримсон Дайджест
@crimsondigest · 141,439
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Ассоциация инвесторов «АВО»
@Bondholders · 26,123
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 September 2026
Манька Аблигация
@marythebond · 44,599
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
TruEcon
@truecon · 26,540
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Артем Тузов. Финансы и инвестиции
@tuzov_invest · 27,614
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
"Нефтегазовая игра" с Александром Фроловым
@OilGasGame · 24,893
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Cbonds
@cbonds · 34,855
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Алексей Бобровский
@alexbobrowski · 37,112
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
ФИНАНСОВЫЕ ДУМКИ
@MarketDumki · 51,866
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Илья Коровин : Торговля временем
@korovinilya2 · 20,938
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
Грокс
@groks · 42,867
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Proeconomics
@proeconomics · 68,532
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Сырьевая игла
@needleraw · 20,397
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 September 2026
#неинвестсовет by Alex Butmanov
@dtiAlgo · 37,289
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
Столыпин 2.0
@stolypin2 · 35,859
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
Frank Media
@frank_media · 31,955
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
MMI
@russianmacro · 102,636
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Нефть и Капитал I Новости Нефтегазовой отрасли
@oil_capital · 22,016
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
Русский экономизм
@russianeconomism · 76,762
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Digital Доктор
@tlgdoc · 29,407
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
Сергей Пирогов
@PirogovLive · 27,814
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Бла-бла-номика
@blablanomika · 45,892
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 67 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Angry Bonds” (@angrybonds), 24,215 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angrybonds.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.