Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,031. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 147,694–149,430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 04:16
147,898
-15
7 Nov 2026, 01:29
147,913
+19
6 Nov 2026, 03:09
147,894
-13
5 Nov 2026, 02:46
147,907
-27
4 Nov 2026, 06:00
147,934
+22
3 Nov 2026, 05:01
147,912
-47
2 Nov 2026, 03:41
147,959
-40
1 Nov 2026, 02:00
147,999
-16
31 Oct 2026, 03:19
148,015
-24
30 Oct 2026, 03:08
148,039
+52
29 Oct 2026, 06:20
147,987
-33
28 Oct 2026, 02:28
148,020
-45
27 Oct 2026, 02:07
148,065
-3
26 Oct 2026, 04:30
148,068
-22
25 Oct 2026, 03:16
148,090
+2
24 Oct 2026, 02:39
148,088
-49
23 Oct 2026, 05:19
148,137
-27
22 Oct 2026, 03:31
148,164
-37
20 Oct 2026, 23:27
148,201
-38
19 Oct 2026, 19:30
148,239
first reading
Engagement
1,261 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 147,898 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,400
375 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
375
of 1,261 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
1,261 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
8,031,450
Reactions total
357,224
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,400
Videos
≈5,640
Links
≈13,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 36m
Average length
1m 35s
Measured directly from 213 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
940,338 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
385,259
41.0%
💯
211,814
22.5%
👍
123,840
13.2%
🔥
69,881
7.43%
🤮
58,086
6.18%
❤
29,059
3.09%
🤯
25,453
2.71%
🙏
16,183
1.72%
😱
11,448
1.22%
😢
6,471
0.688%
👎
2,626
0.279%
😍
218
0.023%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 940,338 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
155
across the posts below
Posts paid on
71
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
54
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @golosmordora1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.1%
1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
16,500
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
20,200
over 999 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqw25xb5
1
1 September 2026
1 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 26 of 375 posts held from the last 30 days (6.93%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Есть такая категория новостей, над которыми даже язвить особо не хочется.
Сбер построил в Подмосковье жилой комплекс на 334 квартиры для военнослужащих и их семей, включая участников СВО. И передал его Министерству обороны в дар.
Не бетонную коробку с торжественно перерезанной ленточкой. Это квартиры с отделкой, кухнями и встроенной техникой. В доме уже работают магазины, медицинский и детский центры, МФЦ, аптека. …
В польском Кракове пятеро убитых в результате стрелкового теракта в центре города. Очень странная история на фоне того, что сейчас вообще происходит в Польше.
И что-то мне подсказывает, что понятно, кого обвинят.
Ширится опыт использования стран в качестве ЧВК. Новой частной военной компанией станет Сирия, главарь которой Джулани договорился с саудитами об использовании своих банд против хуситов в Йемене. Видать, набрался опыта в зарабатывании бабла на пушечном мясе у более опытного товарища.
Шпрехенфюррер Ивановская собирается оштрафовать главу Офиса президента террориста Буданова за разговор на русском языке с протестующими у дома "Азова" под Киевом.
Эх, жаль Кафка не дожил. Такие дикие фантазии ему даже не снились.
В Петропавловской Борщаговке под Киевом случилась Украина
Собственно, она всегда там была, да и не только там, ибо таких мест тысячи, если не десятки тысяч — просто с одной из таких кастрюль, в которой людоеды готовили себе человечину, сорвало крышку. Ее сильно прижимали, давили тяжелым грузом, но от жадности так набили кастрюлю, что крышку все же сорвало и выплеснулась Украина, сильно обдав всех зловонием, ибо людо…
RIP 🙏 ушла из жизни народная артистка РСФСР, Лидия Федосеева-Шукшина
Впервые актриса появилась на экране в 1955 году в фильме «Два капитана». Всесоюзную известность ей принесли роли в фильмах супруга режиссера Василия Шукшина «Печки-лавочки» и «Калина красная». За свою карьеру она снялась более чем в девяноста фильмах, среди которых «Они сражались за Родину», «12 стульев», «Вам и не снилось» и «Виват, гардемарины!»…
В любимом «Театре на Трубной» премьера спектакля «Желтый карлик». Честно говоря, собираясь на спектакль с таким, мягко скажем странным названием, не ожидала ничего выдающегося (ох уж эти стереотипы!) Но режиссер Дмитрий Астрахан не подвел - и спектакль, и подбор артистов на главные роли - выше всяких похвал. Все на своем месте и каждому хочется сказать голосом Станиславского - верю! Много режиссеров брались рассказат…
Жители киевского района Виноградарь перекрыли дорогу и просят Бандеру с Шухевичем включить им электричество.
А они не могут включить.
😁876🤮77🔥20💯19❤6👍4👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,261 posts we hold for @golosmordora1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@golosmordora1 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @golosmordora1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
38 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 80 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@golosmordora1 named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@newsfrontnotes named in 38 posts, 12 August 2026 – 6 November 2026
@special_authors named in 2 posts, 16 October 2026 – 27 October 2026
@foreversssr named in 1 post, 24 October 2026 – 24 October 2026
@sputnikgeorgia named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Папочка канцлера @kanzlerdaddy · 71,761 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
FYTW @fuckyouthatswhy · 24,078 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
Хрюн Моржов @hrunmorgov · 29,513 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
КОРНИЛОВ @kornilov1968 · 118,166 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Новости правда @newsprav_da · 174,260 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
Запрещённая Украина @godeye_ru · 23,814 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
Кухня Роджерса @rogers_kitchen · 50,565 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Радио Стыдоба @Radiostydoba · 92,977 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Пул N3 @dimsmirnov175 · 331,207 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
BALTNEWS @baltnews · 24,376 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
🎭 Политический Юмор 🎭 @Humor_and_Politics · 32,801 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
Лев Щаранский | Официальный канал 🔞 @sharanism · 33,968 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Алексей ПУШКОВ @alexey_pushkov · 41,091 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
Килинкаров Спиридон @KilinkarovSpiridon · 29,256 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
Орда @orda_mordora · 161,257 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
ДТ Д.Куликов-VZ-Т.Сергейцев @dtlive · 67,354 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Во///дь @indeec_1937 · 78,226 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
Объясняю на пальцах @onp2022 · 22,024 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Оптимистка в штатском 🇷🇺 @optimistkavshtatskom · 39,470 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
САРДАРЯН @sardaryanh · 49,216 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Всевидящее око @oko_ok · 127,834 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
V🇷🇺Рука Кремля🇷🇺Z @thehandofthekremlin · 21,682 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
АНДРЕЙ ВАДЖРА @andreyVajra · 33,005 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
SALOBOY™ @SALOBOY_OFFICIAL · 52,330 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 452 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Голос Мордора” (@golosmordora1), 147,898 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/golosmordora1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
