Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

нужно больше кандидатов (с)

@offerdecline

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,947subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001084363804
TypeChannel
Username@offerdecline
DescriptionПереводы свежих статей ведущих западных HR-экспертов в кратком изложении🤝. По рекламе писать @hr_webinars или https://telega.in/c/offerdecline
Created22 August 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/offerdecline

Growth

10,94710,98010,963.56 August 2026 — 10,980 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,980 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,977 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,973 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,969 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,965 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,960 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,947 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,942–10,985 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:1610,947-13
11 Aug 2026, 18:2110,960-5
10 Aug 2026, 15:1210,965-4
9 Aug 2026, 16:2210,969-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:3810,973-4
6 Aug 2026, 17:2010,977-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:4510,980no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:2110,980first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.83%
avg views ÷ 10,947 subscribers
Avg views / post
310
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held27 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total8,371
Reactions total158
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,350
Videos
161
Links
1,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

158 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4226.6%
👍4125.9%
🔥1811.4%
😁1811.4%
🤣148.86%
🤝127.59%
💯74.43%
63.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC172 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

❔ Как сделать встречи 1:1 действительно полезными Встреча 1:1 — это не мини-аттестация и не отчет по задачам. Это регулярный разговор руководителя и сотрудника о работе, сложностях, развитии и поддержке. ➡️ Зачем вообще нужны встречи 1:1 Для сотрудников это возможность: ▪️Получить обратную связь; ▪️Обсудить карьерные цели; ▪️Рассказать о проблемах; ▪️Попросить поддержку; ▪️Понять, что происходит дальше. Для руково

3👍3🤝2

12 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC177 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Наш канал с мемами в Max✋

💯3😁3🤣2

11 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC252 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

❔Как распознать токсичную корпоративную культуру Как выглядит токсичная культура (описывает Мишель Макговерн): 🔘Отсутствие прозрачности; 🔘Фаворитизм; 🔘Постоянный стресс; 🔘Сплетни и негатив; 🔘Отсутствие поддержки руководства; 🔘Конфликты и агрессивное общение. Причём токсичность — это не всегда открытые скандалы. Иногда она выглядит очень «деловой». Например: руководитель пишет в 23:48 «быстренький вопрос», сотрудни

43👍3

10 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC644 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 рекрутинга Обновили для вас подборку статей ✔️ 🤍Найм на основе данных поможет вам победить в сражении за таланты 🤍Как ускорить найм и, при этом, не использовать прерывание неудачных собеседований? 🤍Как создать масштабируемый процесс рекрутинга, который выдержит испытание временем? 🤍Трансформация рекрутинга - от приема заявок на сотрудников к консультативному подходу 🤍8 способов удивить кандидатов в 20

2👍2🤝1

10 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC246 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Подбор без иллюзий 2026 — онлайн-форум e-staff 20 августа Рынок меняется быстрее привычных подходов к найму. Стоимость подбора растет, профильных специалистов по-прежнему не хватает, появляются новые ограничения, а ИИ уже меняет правила игры. 🗓 20 августа с 11:00 до 15:00 (Мск) приглашаем на бесплатный онлайн-форум «Подбор без иллюзий 2026». Вместе с экспертами обсудим, что происходит с подбором и какие решения

🔥43👍2

10 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC227 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Наш канал с мемами в Max✋

🤣5😁2

9 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC269 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

✅ 22% опрошенных считают, что они достойны большей зарплаты, но не будут просить прибавки у руководства. ❓Как вы думаете, какую причину чаще всего называют россияне, по которой они не будут просить прибавки?

  1. Просить прибавки унизительно/неудобно/стыдно40%
  2. В компании тяжелые времена: сокращения, отсутствие заказов и проч.40%
  3. Жадное руководство19%
  4. Жесткие тарифные ставки (в том числе бюджетная сфера)2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC253 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

❓Как вы думаете, сколько % россиян считают, что они не достойны большей зарплаты, чем получают сейчас?

  1. 3%30%
  2. 15% россиян35%
  3. 34%7%
  4. 50% россиян28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC235 viewsread 13 August 2026

#HR_интуиция Проверьте вашу HR-интуицию. 😉 Как вы считаете, что показали опросы? Сегодня мы обратимся к данным опроса Superjob (не заглядывайте в исследование, пока не ответите на вопросы😎).

8 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC282 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎙 #hr_фильм_на_выходные "По соображениям совести" 🎙 #hr_фильм_на_выходные Десмонд Досс идет служить военным медиком, но отказывается брать в руки оружие: его убеждения запрещают ему убивать. Для армии это становится проблемой. Он готов выполнять свой долг и рисковать жизнью наравне с другими, но не готов поступиться принципами. Сослуживцы воспринимают его как слабого, командование — как неудобного. На что обратит

2👍2

7 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC294 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

➡️ Сотрудники не успевают учиться — чем это опасно для бизнеса, и что с этим делать Согласно исследованию, почти половина HR-руководителей считают, что сотрудникам просто некогда учиться, а 70% называют это главным препятствием для развития. Что мешает обучению: ✔️Нагрузка и постоянная спешка Сотрудники часто учатся по остаточному принципу: после работы, между задачами или в обед. В итоге обучение превращается в ещ

33👍2

7 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC285 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Наш канал с мемами в Max✋

😁6💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @offerdecline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@offerdecline edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz43 voters

✅ 22% опрошенных считают, что они достойны большей зарплаты, но не будут просить прибавки у руководства. ❓Как вы думаете, какую причину чаще всего называют россияне, по которой они не будут просить прибавки?

  1. Просить прибавки унизительно/неудобно/стыдно40%
  2. В компании тяжелые времена: сокращения, отсутствие заказов и проч.40%
  3. Жадное руководство19%
  4. Жесткие тарифные ставки (в том числе бюджетная сфера)2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz43 voters

❓Как вы думаете, сколько % россиян считают, что они не достойны большей зарплаты, чем получают сейчас?

  1. 3%30%
  2. 15% россиян35%
  3. 34%7%
  4. 50% россиян28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz67 voters

❓Как вы думаете, какой размер пенсии был бы приемлем для 50% россиян (большинство опрошенных выбрали этот вариант ответа)?

  1. до 25000 р0%
  2. от 25000 до 50000 р13%
  3. от 50000 до 75000 р45%
  4. 75000 р и выше42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz63 voters

✅ 38% россиян хотели бы выйти на пенсию в возрасте 51-60 лет, 29% - в возрасте старше 65 лет. ❓Как вы думаете, сколько % россиян хотели бы выйти на пенсию до 40 лет?

  1. 4%17%
  2. 19%29%
  3. 23%17%
  4. 33%37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 60,037 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“нужно больше кандидатов (с)” (@offerdecline), 10,947 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/offerdecline.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.