Channel
@goodux
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,773subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001368931815 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goodux |
| Description | Как устроены цифровые продукты — просто, с примерами, без воды. Пользовательский опыт, привычки и мышление за кнопками. Для связи: @deabdullin |
| Created | 4 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goodux |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 6,773 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 6,775 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 6,775 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (28 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,063 |
| Reactions total | 117 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
117 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 41.9% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 23.1% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 15.4% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 11.1% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 8.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @goodux. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqvFhZrB | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Дизайн уже не тот. И это хорошая новость. ДизайнКонф II — конференция от Британской высшей школы дизайна о том, как сегодня устроена индустрия и какие навыки теперь определяют современного дизайнера. За один день мы разберем четыре направления современного коммуникационного дизайна: графический дизайн, моушн, UX/UI и арт-дирекшн. Вместе с экспертами из Яндекса, Т-Банка, Самоката, The WAK, Щуки, Tuman, Щелочь, Ambi…
❤4
Инструмент для анимации типографики В чем смысл? Некоторые приёмы по трансформации теста в Фигме достаточно сложно делать, а для других вообще нужен AE. Поэтому автор сервиса сделал максимально простой редактор — несколько режимов, движение от мыши и паузы на понравившихся моментах. Ну и стоп-кадр можно сохранить в .png чтобы использовать в плакатах, баннерах, афишах и т.д. https://crumble.cc ↗ Источник 🖼️ Хороши…
❤6👏2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
😁7
Работы учеников курса по анимации интерфейсов Программе обучения уже чуть больше года, и за это время курс прошли более 100 человек. Кто-то после обучения принял участие в конкурсах Telegram и создал сильные концепты, а кто-то сразу применил новые навыки в рабочих проектах. В этом посте собрал несколько работ учеников — результат практики, экспериментов и внимательной работы с анимацией. Записаться на курс со ски…
❤1
Кто-то придумал способ передачи файлов между двумя телефонами без Wi-Fi, Bluetooth и вообще без сети Работает просто с экраном, на который наводится QR-код на камеру. Одно устройство воспроизводит бесконечный поток анимированных QR-кодов, другое направляет свою камеру на экран и восстанавливает файл из света. Никакого сопряжения, никаких приложений, никакой общей сети, ничего, кроме камеры. 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс
🔥12❤6
Инструмент для подбора шрифтовых пар Fontjoy помогает быстро находить сочетания шрифтов для интерфейсов. Можно не перебирать варианты вручную, а сразу подобрать шрифты, которые действительно хорошо работают вместе. https://fontjoy.com/ ↗ Полезный инструмент, когда хочется быстро собрать гармоничную типографику для проекта. 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс
❤6🔥2
Презентация циферблата для Apple Watch Отличный источник вдохновения в плане типографики и анимации. 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс
👏8❤2
Liquid Photos 🖼️ Концепты интерфейсов
🤔9🔥6
Красивые текстовые анимации прямо из промпта Команда Pixel Point собрала вручную коллекцию готовых текстовых анимаций и упаковала её в Skill для AI-агентов. Внутри уже прописаны параметры анимации: темп, кривые сглаживания и переходы. Поэтому результат выглядит хорошо уже с первого запроса, без долгой настройки вручную. Skill можно использовать с Remotion, Motion, GSAP, WAAPI и другими библиотеками анимации. Уста…
❤6🔥3
POV: ты запустил приложение TEMU
😁3🔥2
Хороший дизайн выглядит простым, и именно это делает его сложным Конечный пользователь видит что-то простое и интуитивно понятное. Он не видит 20 итераций, которые потребовались, чтобы это так ощущалось. Такой уровень глубины невозможно передать с помощью вайбкодинга. Источник 🖼️ Хороший интерфейс
❤11
Инструменты дизайнера меняются быстрее, чем успеваем в них разобраться 😎 За последний год в дизайн ворвались новые инструменты: Cursor, Claude Design, Open Design, вайбкодинг. Что-то из этого станет базой через год-два, что-то исчезнет, но уже очевидно: рынок расслаивается. Дизайнеры, которые встроили AI-агентов в работу, закрывают в одиночку задачи, под которые раньше собирали команды, и берут за это другие ставки. …
😁7❤3🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @goodux. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 532,085 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хороший интерфейс” (@goodux), 6,773 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goodux.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.