Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Семён Колосов: стратегический менеджмент

@simon_said

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,472subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001245167576
TypeChannel
Username@simon_said
Created12 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/simon_said

Growth

3,4643,4723,4686 August 2026 — 3,467 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,467 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,464 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,465 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,472 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,463–3,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:563,472+7
9 Aug 2026, 21:563,465+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:003,464-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:363,467no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:213,467first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 3,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
584
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (26 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,844
Reactions total300
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

396 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16140.7%
🔥12431.3%
🙈348.59%
👍246.06%
❤‍🔥205.05%
💯164.04%
👏71.77%
🌚30.758%
20.505%
😱20.505%
🫡20.505%
🤔10.253%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @simon_said. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC107 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Про карьерный нетворкинг, как стратегическое преимущество Когда вышла моя книга, друзья из Benchmark Executive меня поддержали и мы обсуждали, как мой подход можно использовать для карьерных решений. Потому что ещё после нашего эфира они развивают отдельное направление – “Стратегический карьерный нетворкинг”. И, как продукт, я всчески это поддерживаю. Тем более я знаю ребят и знаю как они работают за кулисами, и мо

🙈6🔥4🌚3

6 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC220 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если вы уже купили резиновый намордник, чтобы бормотать в микрофон и не пугать коллег в опенспейсе, или всё ещё просто печатаете – держите находку: FluidVoice. Это бесплатное приложение для голосового ввода на Mac. Сайт: https://altic.dev/fluid Я до этого пользовался Wispr Flow, но он платный. А FluidVoice нет. Он с открытым кодом, и вся обработка идёт прямо на устройстве – ничего не улетает в облако. Нажали кнопк

9🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC286 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хочу похвастаться и поделиться новостью, что я иду на S26 – летнюю лабораторию про продуктивный поток в эпоху агентов Это такое обучение, где за три недели участники связывают контекст, своё состояние, агентов и людей в одну рабочую конфигурацию. Затем проверяют её на деле и показывают сравнение до и после на Demo Day. Авторы – AI Mindset, я давно слежу за ними, но меня окончательноо покорил их лендинг дизайном и с

🔥84👍4👏1

2 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC329 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Операционная деятельность существует не только ради результата ☝️ Получил вчера запрос от компании, что нужна стратегия и они готовы заплатить после того, как она принесёт результат. Хотел ответить – а ловко вы это придумали) Это такая же история, как “ты же стратег, скажи тогда, что делать”. Это тотальное непонимание того, что вообще такое стратегия. Никто не знает точно, что делать. Мы все работаем с гипотезами,

8🔥62

29 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC429 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

VENOM – фреймворк для стратегирования и реализации стратегии Обычно я скептически отношусь к модным англицизмам. Но с VENOM исключение. Во-первых, мой сын фанат Венома из Marvel, поэтому этот персонаж постоянно мелькает у нас дома. Во-вторых, сначала я просто рисовал схему движения от Vision к Management = от ви́дения будущего к управлению. Посмотрел на эту последовательность и увидел, что между V и M уже по борду

🔥95💯4

26 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC460 views37 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Зачем я написал книгу именно про стратегию и сколько денег она приносит? Для новых подписчиков небольшое пояснение. Я занимаюсь стратегическим менеджментом и исследую влияние AI на бизнес и управление. Помогаю компаниям развиваться: от выбора стратегии до перестройки бизнеса так, чтобы он мог быстрее адаптироваться к изменениям, и доводить выбранные решения до результата. После выхода книги мне задают два вопроса.

25👍6🔥6

22 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC733 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Третий отзыв, который есть на обложке книги «Стратегия без иллюзий» – от Ивана Замесина. ➡️ Если вдруг вы не знакомы с Ваней – его канал: https://t.me/zamesin Вместе с отзывом он мне написал, что много раз ловил себя на мысли, что давно хотел написать похожую книгу. А ещё мы обсудили, что к книге буквально просится отдельный цифровой продукт для постановки целей и работы со стратегией. Ваня даже навайбокодил перв

🔥215

21 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTCviews —

Семён Колосов: стратегический менеджмент pinned a photo

21 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,710 views98 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📚 Вышла моя книга «Стратегия без иллюзий» Теперь её официально можно купить: Альпина, Читай-город, Ozon, WB, Литрес, Яндекс.Книги и др. Для меня это не просто книга. Это несколько лет размышлений, управленческого и жизненного опыта, ошибок, работы с предпринимателями, руководителями и людьми, которые в какой-то момент понимали: дальше действовать по-старому уже не получается, а как по-новому ещё непонятно. Книга о

47🔥31❤‍🔥14👏4🫡2

16 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC921 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Многие спрашивают, как тут дела в Аргентине после выхода сборной в финал чемпионата мира. Как будто это я каждый раз помогаю им отыгрываться) Докладываю: всё отлично. Прикладываю видео. Даже немного завидую аргентинцам. Тому, как они умеют отключиться от всего мира и просто радоваться. Жить сегодняшним вечером, кричать, обнимать незнакомых людей, залезать на светофоры и совершенно не думать, что завтра на работу.

23👍3😱2

14 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC649 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сотрудники Силиконовой долины уже используют специальные маски с шумоподавлением, чтобы диктовать промпты нейросетям и не превращать офис в хор из десятков одновременно разговаривающих с ИИ специалистов. Вот так, маска для общения с нейросетью постепенно становится таким же офисным стандартом, как ноутбук, кофе и созвон, который можно было заменить сообщением. Станет стандартом – ♥️ Просто прикол – 🙈

🙈287🤔1

13 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC596 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как понять, что вы забыли сказать, до того как поручили задачу человеку или AI Недавно инженер Anthropic Thariq Shihipar (Claude Code) разобрал проблему, что Fable 5 стала мощнее, но результат не всегда становился лучше. Его тезис: чем точнее агент исполняет инструкции, тем дороже обходится любая непроговорённая деталь. Слабая модель ошибается заметно и локально: проблему видно сразу. Сильная модель берёт постановк

👍87🔥3❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @simon_said. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,187 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Семён Колосов: стратегический менеджмент” (@simon_said), 3,472 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/simon_said.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.