Photo, posted without a caption
❤1

Channel
@projectmanager_it
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,744subscribers
-103 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001606119425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @projectmanager_it |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/projectmanager_it |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 5,744 | -48 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:40 | 5,792 | -55 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 5,847 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 5,847 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (2 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,188 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
114 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 55 | 48.2% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 23.7% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 16.7% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 6.14% | |
| 🤨 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
▫️ Декомпозируем истории и создаем User story map для фитнес-аппа #посмотреть Карта пользовательских историй – полезный инструмент. Потому что простой в использовании, понятный и разработчикам, и заказчикам, вынуждает смотреть на продукт глазами пользователя и главное – позволяет не делать много ненужной работы, декомпозируя задачи, упорядочивая их, упаковывая релизы с последовательным приростом новых фичей. ⏱Смот…
🔥2❤1
Posted without readable text
❤5👍1🔥1
▫️ Уроки Agile от авиагигантов #посмотреть На первый взгляд, кажется, что это два совершенно разных мира. Но при ближайшем рассмотрении оказывается, что принципы, лежащие в основе Agile подхода, были успешно применимы в авиастроении задолго до того, как стали популярны в IT-сфере. ⏱Смотреть на YouTube ⏱️20 минут
👍4🔥1🙏1
🟢Подборка полезностей для менеджеров и аналитиков 👀 Июнь 🔥Нашумевшее ▫️Я в своём сознании настолько преисполнился, что сделал бизнес на конопле ▫️Делал микро-продукт 1,5 года, потратил 100 000 ₽, им воспользовались 5 000 человек, но не заплатил никто ▫️Мировые маркетплейсы в 2026 году: лидеры, провалы и куда всё движется ▫️Я не пошёл на маркетплейс, не нанял людей, не плачу за рекламу и заработал 2,5 млн ▫️Как я стр…
❤5👍1🔥1
▫️ Risk oriented Approach to Identifying Cybersecurity Requirements #посмотреть In this session, our expert Artem Kagukin guided us through a Risk-Oriented Approach to Identifying Cybersecurity Requirements. ⏱Смотреть на YouTube ⏱️2 часа
🤨5
✈ ИИ может за минуту подготовить объёмное ТЗ. Проблема в том, что за убедительными формулировками часто скрываются общие требования, непроверяемые критерии и упущенные ограничения. Такой документ не ускоряет работу, а создаёт новые вопросы для команды. 🗓 8 июля в 20:00 МСК на открытом уроке разберем, какой контекст нужен нейросети для подготовки полезной документации. Вы узнаете, как превращать сырые идеи в структур…
🔥6👍3
⭐️ ТОП-5 инструментов для ведения технической документации в IT Не будем долго говорить о важности документации — все и так знают, насколько она критична Когда документация есть — она обновлена, структурирована и доступна, — каждый понимает, что делать. Когда её нет — всё знают только «тот тимлид, который уволился 2 года назад», и «тот сеньор, который сейчас в отпуске» 🫠 Чтобы знания не хранились только в голове …
👍4❤1🔥1
▫️ Адаптивное управление: SAFe, Scrum, LeSS, OKR #посмотреть Сегодня мы погрузимся в мир стратегии управления компанией и обсудим, как достичь вершин вместе с современными методологиями. Вас ждет детальный разбор кейса IT-стартапа 7-tech, дорожная карта развития и ответы на самые острые вопросы управления проектами. ⏱Смотреть на YouTube ⏱️25 минут
👍4
Как тимлиду победить синдром самозванца. Бесплатный урок курса «Руководитель команд в ИТ» Переход в роль тимлида редко проходит спокойно. Вчера вы отвечали за свои задачи и качество собственного кода, а сегодня от вас ждут решений, обратной связи, делегирования, работы с конфликтами, общения с бизнесом и результата всей команды. В этот момент легко начать сомневаться: достаточно ли у меня опыта, правильно ли я посту…
🙏5👍2
▫️ Как мы превратили кота в мешке в котенка при найме джуна #посмотреть Я расскажу, как мы сделали достаточно нестандартный процесс эффективного найма и онбординга сотрудников с малым количеством опыта. ⏱Смотреть на YouTube ⏱️40 минут
👍4🔥1
🧠 Вы всё ещё считаете, что генеративные нейросети работают по принципу «рулетки»? Ввели запрос, получили случайный результат и надеетесь на чудо? Это подход дилетанта. Настоящий инженерный подход к ИИ — это управление предсказуемостью. Когда модель выдает строго JSON, Markdown или таблицу, а не «художественный простынь». Когда факты остаются фактами без галлюцинаций. Когда абстрактная задача превращается в четкую, в…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @projectmanager_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,109,942 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Project-менеджер | IT” (@projectmanager_it), 5,744 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/projectmanager_it.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.