Channel
@frontend_mind
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
6,403subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001397427893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @frontend_mind |
| Created | 24 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/frontend_mind |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 6,403 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 6,406 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 6,415 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 6,415 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 5 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (5 November 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 641 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 50.0% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzquYG5Ge | 1 | 4 August 2026 | 4 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🔥 Подборка-сохраняшка самых полезных эфиров с канала. В этом году у нас 3 фокуса - разборы резюме, мок - собесы, анализ рынка от клиентов Этот пост будет постоянно актуализироваться новыми ТОПовыми статьями, подписывайтесь, чтобы не потерять! • разборы резюме • мок собесы (вы очень просили на последнем эфире) • офферы 📹 ЭФИРЫ - РАЗБОРЫ РЕЗЮМЕ 🔴Разборы резюме project manager () 🔴Разборы резюме product manager (http…
🔴 Тестовое собеседование с ТимЛидом Frontend-разработки в этот четверг 6 августа(в четверг!) в 19:00 по мск приходи онлайн на открытое собеседование, чтобы посмотреть на настоящее интервью на Middle Frontend-разработчика. Как это будет: 📂 Алексей Романов, Teamlead в Underhood.dev с опытом 6+ лет, будет задавать реальные вопросы и задачи разработчику-добровольцу 📂 Алексей будет комментировать каждый ответ респондент…
TanStack Form: новый стандарт для работы с формами в JS Все знают TanStack Query (бывший React Query), который перевернул работу с запросами. Теперь команда разработчиков выпустила TanStack Form - библиотеку для управления формами, которая решает старые боли фронтендеров. Главные фишки: 🟢Агностицизм: работает не только с React, но и с Vue, Angular, Solid, Svelte и даже Vanilla JS. 🟢100% Type-Safe: глубокая интегр…
«Летающий» фокус на View Transitions API Анимация перемещения фокуса между элементами (focus ring) делает интерфейс «живее» и помогает пользователю не терять активный элемент при навигации с клавиатуры. Раньше для этого высчитывали координаты через getBoundingClientRect, теперь всё делает браузер. Вместо анимации самой кнопки мы анимируем только рамку фокуса. Для этого каждому интерактивному элементу добавляется вс…
CSS-анимация на примере аналоговых часов Классический разбор того, как знание спецификации заменяет скрипты. Автор воссоздал реалистичные часы, используя только возможности CSS3. Адаптивность через em: Один font-size родителя масштабирует все часы пропорционально (включая тени и засечки). Реалистичный хром: Многослойные box-shadow (внешние и inset) создают объем и металлический блеск без картинок. Вложенные trans…
❤2🤡1
Find the stray number Вам дан массив целых чисел нечетной длины, все из которых одинаковы, за исключением одного единственного числа. Завершите метод, который принимает такой массив и возвращает это единственное число. Входной массив всегда будет верным! (нечетная длина >= 3) Примеры: [1, 1, 2] ==> 2 [17, 17, 3, 17, 17, 17, 17] ==> 3 👉 @frontend_mind
Программирование в алгоритмах Искусство программирования представлено в виде учебного курса, раскрывающего секреты наиболее популярных алгоритмов. Освещены такие вопросы, как комбинаторные алгоритмы, перебор, алгоритмы на графах, алгоритмы вычислительной геометрии. Приводятся избранные олимпиадные задачи по программированию с указаниями к решению. 👉 @frontend_mind
🎉1
@frontend_mind
Как реализовать перегрузку функции в TypeScript? TypeScript поддерживает перегрузку функций, но её реализация отличается от той, которую можно видеть в других языках. А именно, описывается лишь одна функция и некоторое количество её объявлений с разными параметрами. Когда такой код компилируется в JavaScript, в нём остаётся лишь одна функция. Этот механизм работает благодаря тому, что JS-функции можно вызывать с люб…
Зачем использовать семантические классы в CSS?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
@frontend_mind
❤1
Story Points или искусство делать ставку на выдуманные числа Сегодня я хотел бы в очередной раз поднять тему оценки задач, а конкретно оценки при помощи Story Points. Хотя мы давно применяем их в работе, оказалось, что команда по-разному трактует детали. Поэтому мы решили систематизировать и выровнять наши знания, собрать хорошие практики по работе со Story Points и попробовать улучшить процедуру оценки задач у нас.…
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @frontend_mind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Зачем использовать семантические классы в CSS?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какое значение примет result?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 970,788 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Frontend Головного Мозга” (@frontend_mind), 6,403 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frontend_mind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.