GRVT 파운더분이 공식채팅에서 하셨던 소통내용 악마의 편집 아니고 그냥 시간순서에 가까움
❤1

Channel
@sangp_airdrop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,474subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001574287839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sangp_airdrop |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sangp_airdrop |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 1,474 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 1,475 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 1,474 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 1,475 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 1,475 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (10 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,409 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 90.5% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 9.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
GRVT 파운더분이 공식채팅에서 하셨던 소통내용 악마의 편집 아니고 그냥 시간순서에 가까움
❤1
🚨 Binance Alpha 새 토큰 감지! 📌 토큰명: GRVT (GRVT) 📋 CA: 0x46F2564E0FA8248d15125E7e54173cfbdEf91Be7 💰 초기가: 1 GRVT ≈ 0.300000 USDT 🕐 런칭: 2026-07-30 21:00:00 KST ⏳ 남은 시간: 56시간 23분 👤 Owner: 0xb0bb171D333569CfD28a37F5c5DdDAAa90aD46af 🔍 TX | 토큰 | Owner
❤1
🗞 미 상원, 비트코인·암호화폐 클래리티법 8월 3일 표결 전망 🚩 #암호화폐 #비트코인 #코인
❤1
☔ BitMart, 거래소 운영 종료 선언 ✅ 회사의 운영 상황, 시장 환경, 그리고 향후 전략 방향을 신중하게 검토한 결과, BitMart는 거래 플랫폼 운영을 단계적으로 종료하기로 결정 🟢2026년 7월 26일: 신규 가입·입금·신규 주문 중단 🟢2026년 8월 26일: 모든 거래 서비스 종료 🟢2027년 1월 31일: 플랫폼 공식 폐쇄 출금 서비스는 계속 제공이될 예정이며, 모든 이용자는 가능한 빨리 포지션을 정리하고, 필요한 경우 KYC 인증을 완료한 뒤 자산을 출금할것을 권장 트위터 #BITMART
❤1
💰 키움증권, 3만원 딸깍 📌 Summary ( 이벤트 신청 ) - 3.1만원 무조건 지급 (6개월 휴면) - 개인적으로 10분정도 소요되었음 - 대상 확인>신청>거래>익일 지급 ➡️증권사 이벤트지만 꽤 손쉬운 확정형 딸깍이라 공유해 봄. *휴면계좌에 0원 있어도 가능. 1천원 주는걸로 동전주 사면됨.
❤1
📝 다자녀 가구라면 통행료 할인 신청하기 📝 ✅ 2자녀 이상 가구의 경우 ⏰ 사전등록일 : 08. 10 (월) / 사전등록 5부제 시행 ⏰ 시행일 : 08. 22 (토) ➡️ 토, 일요일 및 공휴일 통행료 10% 할인 ✅ 3자녀 이상 가구의 경우 ⏰ 사전등록일 : 07. 22 (수) 10:00 ~ ⏰ 시행일 : 07. 28 (화) ➡️ 토, 일요일 및 공휴일 통행료 20% 할인 ✅ 대상 ➡️ 부 또는 모와 19세 미만 자녀가 동일 세대에 등재되어 있는 경우 ➡️ 승용차, 12인승 이하 승합차 ➡️ 1년 이상 리스/렌트 차량 포함 ➡️ 1톤 화물차, 12인승 초과 승합차 제외 ✅ 이용방법 ➡️ 신청한 부모(부 또는 모) 탑승 시 할인 적용 ➡️ 위치정보 확인 후 자동 감면 ➡️ 자녀만 탑승 시 할인 불가 ✅ 신청방법 ➡️ 고속도로 통행…
❤1
3/ $100불치 온도 기반 주식을 사면 $10불 준다! 쏘 심플 태스크! 마이이더월렛 웹에 접속(기존 지갑 그대로 사용 가능, 추가 설치 필요 없음)해, 100불 이상의 온도 기반 주식을 사고 14일동안 홀딩하면 $10 USDC를 지급합니다! (일단 지금으로써는 다계도 안막혀있는거 같음..) 직접 해본 결과, 지갑에 돈만 있으면 참여까지 10초 컷이에요. 이외에도 1. 매 시각 정각마다 선착순으로 250불 이상을 스왑한 15명에게 $5 USDC를 주는 이벤트 2. 0.15 ETH 이상을 주식 토큰으로 스왑하고 30일 이상 보유하면 $25를 주는 레이어3 이벤트도 함께 진행중이에요. (현재 1000명중 118명 참여 완료, 아마 하면 무조건 될듯?) 💡 요약 MEW 포트폴리오 접속 후, 0.15 ETH 이상을 정각에 스왑 후 한달 이…
❤1
✔️솔라나 모바일, 최대 3,000 SKR 배포 시작 Seeker Summer Round 1이 시작됐습니다. 참여 등급에 따라 1,000~3,000 SKR을 받을 수 있으며, Seed Vault Wallet에서 할당량을 확인하면 됩니다. • 레벨 1: 1,000 SKR • 레벨 2: 2,000 SKR • 레벨 3: 3,000 SKR • 클레임 기간: 30일 🪙수령 방법 Seeker 실행 → Seed Vault Wallet 접속 → Activity Tracking → Check Available Allocations → SKR 수령 ※ 수령한 SKR은 바로 스테이킹해 추가 보상도 받을 수 있습니다. http://stake.solanamobile.com
❤1
☄️Pharos × Axil × R25, 퍼블릭 USDC 스테이킹 볼트 오픈 ⁉️Pharos × Axil × R25 스테이킹 볼트란? 기관 사모 신용자산에 투자해 실물 경제의 소비자 신용 시장에서 발생하는 이자 수익을 기반으로 운용되는 Vault 📣스테이킹 볼트 정보 🟢 참여 기간: 7월 15일 ~ 7월 19일 🟢 Vault 모집 한도: 1억 USDC 🟢 락업 기간: 7월 20일 ~ 10월 20일 (3개월) 🟢 예상 APY: 약 13~14% 🔗 스테이킹 참여 가능 플랫폼 1. TopNod Wallet 2. Pharos ARC 3. Binance Wallet 4. Kucoin Wallet 💬Comment - 스테이블 할거 없으면 여기다 넣어두는거 나쁘지 않을거같네요 - 단점은 3개월 락업이고 조기출금 불가
❤1
하잎 많이 괜찮은 로빈후드 NFT 무료민팅 NFT마다 등급이 있는데 폰지구조라 좋은건 꽤 가격좀 나갈듯 화리도 없이 그냥 무료민팅이라 시간잘봐야할거같음 항상 혹시 모르니 버너지갑으로 접근할것 X프로필 / 민팅사이트
❤2
락업 거는 케이스는 트리아 보면 알 수 있음 비들패드에서 세일하고 30% TGE 언락, 6개월 락업 후 베스팅임 6개월 중간동안 가격 펌핑 잘해서 물리는 차트 잘 만들어놓고 6개월 언락시점즘 세일가로 만들어놓음 프로젝트는 mm하고 고점부터 물량 다 털어서 수익 다 봄 grvt는 1배 아니면 파밍유저들은 돈 벌 수 없다고 보면 됨 근데 파밍단가 1불로 맞춰서 파밍했다면 이번 슬래싱을 통해서 파밍단가 10불로 되버리는 프로젝트만 돈버는 전략에 당하게됨 결국 뭘 해도 그게 왜 니돈이야 시전
❤1👻1
참 머리가 복잡해졌음 그치만 시작을 해야겠지 1번째 멀티플라이어 문제부터 잡자면 이건 그냥 눈치싸움을 빙자한 사실상 학살임 1배 골라도 계산상 슬래싱이고 2배,4배 하는 사람이 많아질수록 더더욱 그 효과는 배가됨 근데 현실적으로 2배,4배 하는 거? 팀이 하겠지 현실적으로 생각하면 팀이 물량을 많이 가지고 있을거임 여기서는 선택의 자유가 없다 무슨 선택을 해도 팀이 원하는 방향이 될거임 2번째 그러면 왜 이런 선택을 했을까? 가격은 방어가 안될거 같으니 선택했겠지 그런데 왜 지금 냈을까? 팀은 이사태를 예상했고 이것에 대한 반발또한 예상했음 덧붙여서 생각을 더 나아갈 필요가 있음 시즌2 사람들은 채단가가 250m 정도라고 치자 시즌 1 그것보다 훨씬 낮을 거임 그러나 이번걸로 x2 배가 되었다 모든 채단가가 / 근데도 팀은 …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sangp_airdrop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sangp_airdrop named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“생계형 에어드랍” (@sangp_airdrop), 1,474 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sangp_airdrop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.