Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for إبراهيم الجاكي

Channel

إبراهيم الجاكي

@algaky_1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,552subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001664897190
TypeChannel
Username@algaky_1
Created11 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/algaky_1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

2,4642,5572,510.56 August 2026 — 2,464 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,468 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,471 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,511 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,540 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,551 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,556 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,555 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,557 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,554 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,550 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,547 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,552 subscribers27 September 2026 — 2,548 subscribers5 October 2026 — 2,551 subscribers12 October 2026 — 2,550 subscribers15 October 2026 — 2,545 subscribers18 October 2026 — 2,547 subscribers24 October 2026 — 2,549 subscribers27 October 2026 — 2,548 subscribers30 October 2026 — 2,547 subscribers2 November 2026 — 2,548 subscribers5 November 2026 — 2,547 subscribers8 November 2026 — 2,552 subscribers2,5526 August 20268 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 94 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,450–2,571 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 22:542,552+5
5 Nov 2026, 19:112,547-1
2 Nov 2026, 21:552,548+1
30 Oct 2026, 19:572,547-1
27 Oct 2026, 13:372,548-1
24 Oct 2026, 11:552,549+2
18 Oct 2026, 09:562,547+2
15 Oct 2026, 06:472,545-5
12 Oct 2026, 13:272,550-1
5 Oct 2026, 16:382,551+3
27 Sept 2026, 22:412,548-4
18 Sept 2026, 11:192,552+5
13 Sept 2026, 20:572,547-3
10 Sept 2026, 12:362,550-4
5 Sept 2026, 07:202,554-3
1 Sept 2026, 04:352,557+2
29 Aug 2026, 04:572,555-1
26 Aug 2026, 08:172,556+5
22 Aug 2026, 23:042,551+11
16 Aug 2026, 21:132,540first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 33 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

839 reactions across 31 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤34941.6%
🤣23227.7%
😁12615.0%
🥰688.10%
😭212.50%
👍141.67%
👏131.55%
😢50.596%
🕊40.477%
🤩40.477%
👀20.238%
👎10.119%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 839 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC94 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

تمانية وربع من عشرة

🤣8😁4🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

تجاهلي أي تواصل غير واضح الهدف واهتمي فقط بواضحات الأمور

👏4

6 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC119 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

شطبت ع الرسالة هجاوب على إيه بقا دلوقتي وهي مشطوب عليها؟

🤣7😭2👀1

6 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC118 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

مشاهدة القصص ومتابعة القناة لا يعني أنه يريد التقدم والزواج والمراسلة على صارحني لا تعني أنه نفس الشخص أنت تسمحين للوهم أن يتمكن منك لأنك تميلين إليه فعلا وترغبين في ذلك لكنه قد لا يكون شيئ من ذلك

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC123 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

أنت وأنا وجميع الحاضرون يعرف ما الذي يكفي ليعجب الفتاة وأي إنسان بشكل عام

😁3👍2

6 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC128 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

لو أخذ خطوة جادة من البداية أو طلب يتقدم نخليه يتواصل مع الأهل ويجي البيت ويشوفك ويكون ما يكون دون بناء آمال على هذه الخطوة الأولى لو لم يأخذ في البداية خطوة جادة وواضحة نعمل له بلوك أو نتجاهله

❤4👏1

6 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC139 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

اه ممكن حد يرفض حد بعد ما يشوفه عادي

😭4👍1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC160 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

آمين وإياكم الحمد لله

❤10

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @algaky_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @algaky_1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أحمد عبد المنصف
@abdelmonsef · 20,365
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
مُعِينَات | Mo3inat
@mo3inat · 22,243
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
مورستان بلاك ليست🕵‍♂
@Morestanblacklist88 · 27,637
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
واحة القرآن عادل الجندي
@wahaQuR · 33,029
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
تراث الشيخ كامل يوسف البهتيمي
@Elbahtimy · 19,548
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 October 2026
شباب بتساعد شباب
@shbab_btsad_shbab · 53,998
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
مُسدَّد
@lllmmmlllllll · 22,440
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
« قيامة الشعر »
@Alqyamh · 23,919
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
مشروع ضاكتور
@Mashrou3_Dactoor · 45,057
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“إبراهيم الجاكي” (@algaky_1), 2,552 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algaky_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.