Channel
@Rafe3y
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,285subscribers
+887 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001488833943 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rafe3y |
| Description | حُجَّةُ العرب، ومؤيِّدُ الدين، حارِسُ لغةِ القرآن، صدرُ البيان العربي، الأديبُ الإمام، مُعجِزَةُ الأدب. 🇪🇬🔻 🇵🇸 "لا أحلل الاقتباس لأصحاب القنوات" |
| Created | 18 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rafe3y |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:38 | 18,285 | +15 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 06:11 | 18,270 | +20 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:11 | 18,250 | +10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:55 | 18,240 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:41 | 18,243 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:21 | 18,244 | +9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:19 | 18,235 | +9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:07 | 18,226 | +12 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:35 | 18,214 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:31 | 18,216 | +10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 18,206 | +7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:00 | 18,199 | +3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 18,196 | +3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:47 | 18,193 | +13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 18,180 | +7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 18,173 | +5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 18,168 | +18 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:18 | 18,150 | +12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:54 | 18,138 | +8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:39 | 18,130 | first reading |
186 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 186 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 48,378 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
فليس من الشرطِ عندي أن يكونَ عصرُ الشاعرِ وبيئتُه في شِعرِه، وإنما الشرطُ أن تكونَ هناك نفسُه الشاعرةُ على طريقتِها في الفهمِ والتصوير، وأنت تُثبِتُ هذه النفسَ بهذه الطريقةِ أنَّ لها أن تقولَ كلمتَها الجديدة، وأنها مُخوِّلةٌ له الحقَّ في أن تقولَها؛ إذ هي للعقولِ والأرواحِ أُختُ الكلمةِ القديمة؛ كلمة الشريعةِ التي جاءت بها النبوَّةُ من قبل. [الملَّاح التائه || وحي القلم]
وديوانُ "المَلَّاح التائِه" الذي أخرجَه هذا الشاعرُ – علي محمود طه – لا ينزلُ بصاحبِه من شِعرِ العصرِ دون الموضعِ الذي أومأنا إليه؛ فما هو إلا أن تقرأَه وتعتبرَ ما فيه بشِعرِ الآخِرين حتى تجدَ الشاعرَ المهندسَ كأنه قادمٌ للعصرِ مُحمَّلًا بذهنِه وعواطفِه وآلاتِه ومقاييسِه ليُصلِحَ ما فسد، ويُقيمَ ما تداعَى، ويُرمِّمَ ما تخرَّب، ويهدِمَ ويَبني. [الملَّاح التائه || وحي القلم]
وأمّا فريقُ الشُّعراءِ ففي أوائلِ أمثلتِه عندي الشاعرُ المهندسُ علي محمود طه. أشهدُ أني أكتبُ عنه الآن بنوعٍ من الإعجابِ الذي كتبتُ به في "المقتطف" عن أصدقائي القُدماء: محمود باشا البارودي، وإسماعيل باشا صبري، وحافظ، وشوقي — رحمهم الله، وأطالَ بقاءَ صاحبِنا — فهذا الشابُّ المهندسُ أُوتيَ من هندسةِ البناءِ قوةَ التمييزِ ودقَّةِ المُحاسبة، ووُهِبَ مَلَكةَ الفصلِ بين الحُسنِ والقُبحِ في الأشكالِ مما عِلَّتُه من العِلمِ …
هناك ميزانٌ للشاعرِ الصحيحِ وللآخرِ المُتشاعِر: فالأولُ تأخذُ من طريقتِه ومجموعِ شِعرِه أنه ما نظَّمَ إلا ليُثبِتَ أنه قد وضعَ شِعرًا، والثاني تأخذُ من شِعرِه وطريقتِه أنه إنما نظَّمَ ليُثبِتَ أنه قرأ شِعرًا … وهذا الثاني يُشعِرُك بضَعفِه وتلفيقِه أنه يخدمُ الشِّعرَ ليكونَ شاعرًا، ولكنَّ الأوَّلَ يُريكَ بقوَّتِه وعبقريَّتِه أنَّ الشِّعرَ نفسَه يخدمُه؛ ليكونَ هو شاعرَه. [الملَّاح التائه || وحي القلم]
فإذا نافرَتِ المعاني ألفاظَها واختلفت الألفاظُ على معانيها قال: إنَّ هذا في الفن … هو الاستواءُ والاطِّرادُ والمُلاءمةُ وقوةُ الحَبك؛ وإذا عوَّصَ وخانه اللفظُ والمعنى جميعًا وأساءَ ليتكلَّفَ وتساقطَ ليتحذلقَ وجاءك بشِعرِه وتفسيرِ شِعرِه والطريقةِ لفهمِ شِعرِه قال: إنه أعلى من إدراكِ مُعاصِريه، وإنَّ عجرفةَ معانيه هذه آتيةٌ من أنَّ شِعرَه من وراء اللغة، من وراء الحالةِ النفسية، من وراء العصر، من وراء الغيب؛ كأنَّ المو…
وليس بشاعرٍ مَن لا ينقلُ لك عن الحياةِ نقلًا فنيًّا شعريًّا، فترى الشيءَ في الطبيعةِ كأنه موجودٌ بظاهرِه فقط، وتراهُ في الشِّعرِ بظاهرِه وباطنِه معًا؛ وليس بشِعرٍ ما إذا قرأتَه، واسترسلتَ إليه لم يكُن عندك وجهًا من وجوهِ الفهمِ والتصويرِ للحياةِ والطبيعةِ في نفسٍ مُمتازةٍ مُدرِكةِ مُصوِّرة. [الملَّاح التائه || وحي القلم]
تَجِد بعضَ النظَّامين يُحسِنون من اللغةِ وفنونِ الأدب، فإذا نظَّموا وخلا نظمُهم من روحِ الشِّعرِ — ظهرتِ الألفاظُ في أوزانِهم وكأنها فقدتْ شيئًا من قيمتِها، كأنَّ موضعَها ثَمَّ هو الذي أعلنَ إفلاسَه؛ إذ أقامَه مقامَ الذي يُريد أن يُعطي ثمَّ هو إذا وقفَ لا يصنعُ شيئًا إلا أن يعتذرَ بأنه لم يجد ما يُعطيه … فهذا كان رجلًا من الناس، وكان في سترٍ وعافية، فلما وقفَ موقفَه انقلبَ مُدلِّسًا كاذبًا مُدَّعيًا فاختلفت به الحالُ…
وما الأسلوبُ البيانيُّ إلا وسيلةٌ فنيَّةٌ لمُضاعفةِ التعبير، فإن لم يكُن هذا ما يُعطيه كان وسيلةً فنيَّةً أُخرى لمُضاعفةِ الخَيبة؛ وهذا ما تُحِسُّه في كثيرٍ من شِعرِ النظَّامين أو البديعيِّين في العصورِ الميِّتة، وتُحِسُّه في الشِّعرِ الميِّتِ الذي لا يزالُ يُنشَرُ بيننا. [الملَّاح التائه || وحي القلم]
وأكثرُ الشِّعرِ الذي في أيّامِنا هذه لا يتَّصِلُ بنفسي ولا يخفُّ على طبعي، ولا أراهُ يقعُ من الشِّعرِ الصحيحِ إلا من بُعد، وهو منِّي أنا كالرجلِ يمُرُّ بي في الطريقِ لا أعرفُه؛ فلا ينظرُ إليَّ ولا أنظرُ إليه، فما أُبصِرُ منه رجلًا وإنسانيةً وحياةً أكثرَ مما أراهُ ثوبًا وحِذاءً وطربوشًا! [الملَّاح التائه || وحي القلم]
إذا أردتُ أن أكتبَ عن شِعرٍ فقرأتُه، كان من دَأبي أن أقرأَه مُتثبِّتًا أتصفَّحُ عليه في الحرفِ والكلمة، إلى البيتِ والقصيدة، إلى الطريقةِ والنهج، إلى ما وراء الكلامِ من بواعثِ النفسِ الشاعرةِ ودوافعِ الحياةِ فيها، وعن أيِّ أحوالِ هذه النفسِ يصدرُ هذا الشاعر، وبأيِّها يتسبَّبُ إلى الإلهام، وفي أيِّها يتَّصلُ الإلهامُ به، وكيف يتصرَّفُ بمعانيه، وكيف يسترسلُ إلى طبعِه، ومن أين المأتى في رديئِه وسَقطِه، وبماذا يسلكُ إلى …
فإني لأطربُ للشِّعرِ الجيِّدِ الوثيقِ أنواعًا من الطربِ لا نوعًا واحدًا، وهي تُشبِهُ في التفاوتِ ما بين قطرةِ الندى الصافيةِ في ورقِ الزنبقةِ وقطرةِ الشعاعةِ المتألِّقةِ في جوهرِ الماسةِ ومَوجةِ النورِ المتألِّهةِ في كوكبِ الزهرة. [الملَّاح التائه || وحي القلم]
وما المجازاتُ والاستعاراتُ والكناياتُ ونحوها من أساليبِ البلاغةِ إلا أسلوبٌ طبيعيٌّ لا مذهبَ عنه للنفسِ الفنية؛ إذ هي بطبيعتِها تريدُ دائمًا ما هو أعظم، وما هو أجمل، وما هو أدق؛ ورُبَّما ظهرَ ذلك لغيرِ هذه النفسِ تكلُّفًا وتعسُّفًا ووضعًا للأشياءِ في غيرِ مواضعِها، ويخرجُ من هذا أنه عملٌ فارغٌ وإساءةٌ في التأدِيةِ وتمحُّلٌ لا عِبرَةَ به، ولكنَّ فنيَّةَ النفسِ الشاعرةِ تأبى إلا زيادةَ معانيها، فتصنعُ ألفاظَها صناعةً ت…
Showing the 12 most recent of 186 posts we hold for @Rafe3y. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 4 posts on @Rafe3y as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مصطفى صادق الرافعي” (@Rafe3y), 18,285 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rafe3y.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.