9 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,516–29,535 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 10:04
29,528
+10
12 Aug 2026, 11:44
29,518
-6
11 Aug 2026, 11:42
29,524
-7
10 Aug 2026, 11:14
29,531
-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:51
29,533
+4
8 Aug 2026, 11:40
29,529
-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:17
29,530
+4
7 Aug 2026, 01:45
29,526
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:39
29,526
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.69%
avg views ÷ 29,528 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
22 (20 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
36,964
Reactions total
468
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,280
Videos
≈360
Links
≈991
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 52s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
468 reactions across 22 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
197
42.1%
❤
168
35.9%
👍
70
15.0%
👏
27
5.77%
😁
6
1.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Миссия нужна не всем. Но некоторым — обязательно☝️
Например, если бизнес растёт и набирает новичков в команду, без миссии трудно. Я уж не говорю о борьбе с конкурентами.
А самое вредное, что можно сделать — придумать просто красивую миссию.
В хорошем бизнесе миссия уже есть. Её просто нужно найти и сформулировать. Директор Лидмашины Анастасия Мартынова рассказала, как это сделать.
Теорию и практику найдёте в кейс…
⌛ «Серьёзно? Опять не я? Ведь я же тащу все проекты на себе».
Ты смотришь на повышение и внутри просто закипаешь.
Потому что ты знаешь, сколько раз именно ты вытаскивал ситуацию.
Когда всё горело — звонили тебе.
Когда был сложный клиент — отдавали тебе.
Когда нужно было срочно придумать решение — снова ты.
И вот наступает момент, когда выбирают человека на ступень выше.
И выбирают не тебя.
Самое обидное?
Иногд…
Даже представить сложно, каково сейчас продавцам маркетплейсов.
Сочувствую и желаю предпринимателям не опустить руки.
Сейчас замечаю в социальных сетях, что многие селлеры думают о запуске своего интернет-магазина.
Команда Лидмашины постаралась помочь тем, кто всегда работал только с маркетплейсами, разобраться в этом вопросе. Они выпустили статью, в которой честно сравнили собственный сайт и сторонние площадки.
…
▶️ Человек интереснее компании. Всегда.
Сегодня в Клубе прошел мощный эфир.
Разбирали тему, которую профессионалам больше нельзя игнорировать: зачем эксперту, топ-менеджеру или предпринимателю нужен личный бренд и как перестать недооценивать свой опыт.
Для тех, кто пропустил, соберу главную суть:
1️⃣ Людям доверяют в 24 раза больше, чем брендам. Мы охотнее читаем и слушаем живого человека, а не безликую корпорати…
У сезонного бизнеса маркетинг тоже должен быть сезонным☝️
Предприниматели об этом часто забывают. В итоге продают, когда клиент не готов покупать, а неудачи списывают на соцсети и SMM-специалистов.
У каждой задачи свое время.
Когда спрос низкий — не продавайте. Объясняйте, делитесь опытом, формируйте доверие.
А в сезон, когда спрос появляется, — помогайте клиенту делать выбор. Снимайте препятствия на пути к покупк…
▶️Назвать себя существительным — самый быстрый способ стать таким же, как все.
— Я маркетолог.
— Я дизайнер.
— Я юрист.
— Я консультант.
Звучит нормально.
Но именно в этот момент рынок перестаёт видеть человека и начинает видеть категорию.
А категории всегда сравнивают по цене.
Это одна из самых дорогих ошибок личного маркетинга.
Большинство специалистов пытаются запомниться.
Хотя сначала нужно добиться сов…
Денег мало. Реклама дорогая. Покупатели экономят.
Могу продолжить перечислять причины, по которым продажи снизились.
Интересно, что маркетинг предприниматели откладывают по тем же самым причинам. Хотя именно сейчас нужно действовать💪
Не обязательно вкладывать сотни тысяч рублей в новый сайт, рекламу или команду.
По-настоящему сейчас важно:
• увидеть основные ошибки;
• найти точки роста;
• сэкономить на эксперимен…
🔼Почему один специалист или предприниматель получает 30 000 ₽, а другой за ту же работу — 300 000 ₽?
Часто кажется, что всё дело в опыте и регалиях.
Но это далеко не всегда так. Практика показывает: эксперт за 300 000 ₽ далеко не всегда знает или делает в 10 раз больше.
Просто рынок знает его намного лучше.
В современном бизнесе выигрывает не тот, кто работает больше всех.
Выигрывает тот, кому доверяют.
Тот, чь…
Предприниматели много думают о том, как привлечь пользователей.
Но в погоне за новыми подписчиками успевают надоесть старым.
Шаблонные тексты, просроченные тренды, бесконечная новая искренность — способов получить отписку масса.
🤟 Коллеги из Лидмашины предупредили о самых распространённых ошибках брендов в соцсетях.
Кстати, часто поток раздражающего контента — это попытка продвинуться бесплатно.
О том, почему та…
❤11🔥5👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @mann_igor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 143,594 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игорь Манн” (@mann_igor), 29,528 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mann_igor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.