Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,673–7,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 12:46
7,701
-6
6 Nov 2026, 04:10
7,707
-7
3 Nov 2026, 03:31
7,714
-10
31 Oct 2026, 12:55
7,724
-14
28 Oct 2026, 02:10
7,738
-10
25 Oct 2026, 10:44
7,748
-7
22 Oct 2026, 01:49
7,755
-8
18 Oct 2026, 13:28
7,763
-5
15 Oct 2026, 15:26
7,768
-5
12 Oct 2026, 12:40
7,773
-13
5 Oct 2026, 14:17
7,786
-8
27 Sept 2026, 13:01
7,794
-7
18 Sept 2026, 06:16
7,801
-3
14 Sept 2026, 06:16
7,804
-9
10 Sept 2026, 17:15
7,813
-20
5 Sept 2026, 10:42
7,833
-11
1 Sept 2026, 05:24
7,844
+1
28 Aug 2026, 22:34
7,843
-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:43
7,844
-2
23 Aug 2026, 04:57
7,846
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.49%
avg views ÷ 7,701 subscribers
Avg views / post
500
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
46 (26 June 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
13,000
Reactions total
351
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 02:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
927
Videos
435
Links
641
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1h 12m
Average length
6m 35s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
963 reactions across 44 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
236
24.5%
❤
160
16.6%
👍
117
12.1%
💯
117
12.1%
😁
115
11.9%
👏
89
9.24%
❤🔥
68
7.06%
⚡
24
2.49%
🤝
16
1.66%
🤩
8
0.831%
✍
6
0.623%
😇
4
0.415%
🥰
2
0.208%
😱
1
0.104%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 963 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Даже Гигачат не сразу справляется с простыми задачами
День 21/90
25 шаг "Системы 4х90"
Бизнес-реалити "Из найма в собственный бизнес за 90 дней"
Что такого, загрузил картинку в Гигачат, дал команду "Нарисуй шаблон с текстом" - 2 минуты и шаблон готов?!
Легко сказать, пока не начинаешь делать.
Даже Искусственный Интеллект ведёт себя как новичок 😜 ты ему говоришь что написать, а он пишет совсем не то, что нужно.
Бо…
ПОЧЕМУ ТЫ ВЫБРАЛ ОРИФЛЭЙМ?
День - 18/90
22 шаг "Системы 4х90"
Бизнес-реалити "Из найма в собственный бизнес за 90 дней"
Мы попросили Бориса написать 10 причин, почему он выбрал именно Орифлэйм.
Борис написал:
1. 60 лет компании, вызывает доверие.
2. Развивается в более 60 стран мира, широкий масштаб развития.
3. Качественная, сертифицированная продукция.
4. Усиленный план успеха.
5. Уникальная система обучения 4*9…
О чём ты чаще всего говоришь?
Люди мелкой судьбы обсуждают других людей.
Люди средней судьбы обсуждают чужие события.
Люди великой судьбы обсуждают идеи, цели, мечты и планы для их реализации.
Вспомни свои разговоры за последние дни. На что ушло больше времени?
По темам наших разговоров видно, чему мы отдаём внимание, энергию. А по тому, что делаем после разговора, видно, куда мы движемся.
Видеозапись встречи
Разбор ситуационного лидерства
Практика, Эдуарда Васильева
⬆️ Как Быть результативным наставником для других
⬆️ Что значит, быть наставником для самого себя
Это практическая, работающая технология. Применяя это делегирование будет полноценным и грамотным
+ запись в RuTube
https://rutube.ru/video/private/3daad66a0cb8301cef5cce729b6cec6a/?p=dlh-0MeDHcgBbu_Irf6KbQ
СДЕЛАЙТЕ СВОИ СТОРИСЫ СЕРИАЛОМ
Делюсь с вами одним из уроков из нашего реалити "ИЗ НАЙМА В СОСТВЕННЫЙ БИЗНЕС за 90 ДНЕЙ"
Которое мы проводим с Эдуардом Васильевым
ПРЕВРАТИТЕ СВОЙ ДЕНЬ В СЕРИАЛ
Сегодня ваша задача — превратить свои сторисы в сериал и в инструмент эффективности.
Покажите не только себя, но и включите команду: пусть люди тоже снимают свои сторисы и включаются в общий ритм.
Сделайте так, чтобы ва…
То, что давало результат раньше
С ростом может быть помехой
Например, на пути к Директору важно осваивать навыки, становиться самостоятельным. Уметь самому проводить обучения, вести чаты, и т.д
А вот, чтобы создавать новые Директорские команды
Важно уже делегировать многие задачи. И вот тут у многих есть ловушка.
Называется она так
Хочешь сделать хорошо - сделай это сам(а).
Это ловушка
В итоге ты не будешь давать …
ЗА БОРИСОМ УЖЕ НАБЛЮДАЮТ ДАЖЕ ТЕ, КТО "ДАЛЕК ОТ ЭТОГО ВСЕГО" 🙂
Борису пишут: «Наблюдаю за вашим блогом»
И я вижу по комментариям, что за нашим реалити действительно наблюдают и кому-то нравится 😉
За Бориса переживают
Его поддерживают
Иногда спорят с ним
Иногда узнают в нём себя
Кто стоит за всем этим?
Придумал и продюсирует наше бизнес-реалити Андрей Коваленко.
Мы с Андреем уже провели несколько реалити с кома…
УСПЕХ - ЭТО РУТИНА
День 14/90
17 шаг "Системы 4х90"
Бизнес-реалити "Из найма в собственный бизнес за 90 дней"
Борис, просто делает одно и то же
Пишет людям
Звонит
Возвращается к тем, с кем уже разговаривал
Отвечает на сообщения
Знакомится
Первые действия с новыми партнёрами
Изучает очередной блок "Системы 4×90"
Потому что бизнес чаще всего выглядит именно так.
Десятки маленьких действий, которые человек повторяет …
❤12⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @eduardvasilyev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Радислав Гандапас @radislavgandapascom · 52,696 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Игорь Манн @mann_igor · 27,429 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эдуард Васильев | Жизнь в сетевом бизнесе” (@eduardvasilyev), 7,701 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eduardvasilyev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.