Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Павел Гительман

Channel

Павел Гительман

@potok_gitelman

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,562subscribers

+4,343 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001854747271
TypeChannel
Username@potok_gitelman
DescriptionС командой RTA создал млрд. бизнес Новый бизнес сеть падел-клубов Buenos Padel Тренинг КОМАНДА 29-30.09 в Стамбуле🔥 Gitelman Group L.L.C-FZ (licence 2312341)
Created29 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/potok_gitelman

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,21038,56236,3866 August 2026 — 34,219 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,210 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,213 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,234 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,266 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,277 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,281 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,284 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,260 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,247 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,284 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,317 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,329 subscribers19 August 2026 — 34,697 subscribers20 August 2026 — 34,874 subscribers21 August 2026 — 34,990 subscribers22 August 2026 — 35,112 subscribers24 August 2026 — 35,321 subscribers25 August 2026 — 35,752 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,537 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,924 subscribers28 August 2026 — 37,045 subscribers29 August 2026 — 37,172 subscribers30 August 2026 — 37,238 subscribers31 August 2026 — 37,326 subscribers1 September 2026 — 37,384 subscribers2 September 2026 — 37,397 subscribers3 September 2026 — 37,478 subscribers5 September 2026 — 37,605 subscribers9 September 2026 — 37,808 subscribers11 September 2026 — 37,953 subscribers13 September 2026 — 38,004 subscribers15 September 2026 — 38,032 subscribers17 September 2026 — 38,074 subscribers19 September 2026 — 38,135 subscribers26 September 2026 — 38,562 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net +4,343. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,557–39,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 20:3738,562+427
19 Sept 2026, 14:4238,135+61
17 Sept 2026, 03:3738,074+42
15 Sept 2026, 06:1738,032+28
13 Sept 2026, 13:1938,004+51
11 Sept 2026, 16:1637,953+145
9 Sept 2026, 00:1637,808+203
5 Sept 2026, 19:1637,605+127
3 Sept 2026, 20:5737,478+81
2 Sept 2026, 12:4437,397+13
1 Sept 2026, 12:2537,384+58
31 Aug 2026, 12:2837,326+88
30 Aug 2026, 13:1737,238+66
29 Aug 2026, 12:3737,172+127
28 Aug 2026, 15:4937,045+121
27 Aug 2026, 17:0236,924+387
26 Aug 2026, 16:0736,537+785
25 Aug 2026, 18:0235,752+431
24 Aug 2026, 17:1335,321+209
22 Aug 2026, 22:2835,112first reading

Engagement

148 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.65%
avg views ÷ 38,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,720
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 148 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held148 (31 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total249,290
Reactions total5,861
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 13:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,890
Videos
≈33
Links
≈574

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

12,216 reactions across 148 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,04441.3%
🔥3,80631.2%
👍8266.76%
❤‍🔥6815.57%
🤣4173.41%
😁3582.93%
💯1641.34%
⚡1441.18%
🙏1411.15%
👏1381.13%
custom 5309941438971132144990.81%
😍810.663%
🥰780.639%
🤩700.573%
👀360.295%
🎉340.278%
🙈300.246%
🤝230.188%
💔190.156%
🤔90.074%
7 further kinds180.147%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 148 of the 148 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
467
across the posts below
Posts paid on
94
of 148 we hold a reading for · 64%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @potok_gitelman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 148 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 04:46 UTC≈2,050 views55 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Если вы очень хотели увидеть печать нашей компании :)

❤31🔥17❤‍🔥3👏2custom 53099414389711321442

26 Sept 2026, 20:45 UTC≈2,940 views110 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Поужинал с легендам Кого узнаете на фото?

👍59❤26🔥20❤‍🔥4🙈1

25 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC≈3,660 views39 reactionsread 27 September 2026

2 промпта РАСКРЫЛИ, как каждый сотрудник использует ИИ Я хотел, чтобы каждый человек в нашей команде усиливал себя с помощью ИИ. Но не понимал, как на это повлиять. Кому-то не хватало навыка. Кому-то подходящего инструмента. А у кого-то уже был сильный опыт, который можно передать всей команде. Только я не видел всей картины. Поэтому мы провели диагностику и определили точку А каждого сотрудника. Для меня это был …

❤24🔥9😍4👍2

25 Sept 2026, 09:12 UTC≈3,410 views50 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Прочел ваши мысли из поста выше - капец какие вы крутые и заряженные🔥✊ Вот это энергия! Вот это заряд! Красавчики и красотки🖤 Здесь лучшая аудитория 💪

❤33👍7🙏7❤‍🔥3

25 Sept 2026, 05:27 UTC≈3,540 views79 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Какая мысль приходит первой в голову , когда просыпаетесь? Я начну: «Есть только сегодня. Вчера и завтра - нет» Делитесь в комментах, прочту каждую)))

🔥46👍13❤8🥰5❤‍🔥4😍3

24 Sept 2026, 14:18 UTC≈3,770 views70 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

Nofilter

😍31👍20❤‍🔥10❤5🤩3😁1

24 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC≈3,610 views27 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Как собрать команду мирового масштаба? Недавно я обсуждал этот вопрос с Вадимом Бухкаловым Вот масштаб его бизнеса: • 35 лет в предпринимательстве • около 400 сотрудников в VillaCarte Group • около $100 млн заключённых сделок в год • строит город в городе на Пхукете — Layan Verde — проект стоимостью около $500 млн С ростом бизнеса меняются и требования к людям, которые должны находиться рядом с собственником У Ва…

🔥19❤7🙏1

24 Sept 2026, 05:42 UTC≈3,620 views108 reactions3 Starsread 27 September 2026

А ведь через пару лет фраза «я умею работать с ИИ» реально будет звучать смешно Так же как сегодня «Я умею пользовать Excel» И вот что меня добило Grab вместе с OpenAI сейчас запускают обучение ИИ для 30 000 водителей, курьеров и владельцев маленьких бизнесов в Азии Людей, которые развозят еду, возят пассажиров и держат маленькие магазины НО их не учат писать красивые промпты А показывают как посмотреть продажи…

🔥52❤30🙈13👍7💯3😁3

23 Sept 2026, 05:45 UTC≈3,890 views94 reactions3 Starsread 27 September 2026

Осознав ЭТО - команда станет сильнее В выпуске с Фарухом и Петей Инглиш был один момент, который я потом ещё долго крутил в голове я про этот выпуск Петя выдал интересную мысль, мол, мне иногда неловко перед командой. Я летаю бизнес-классом. Зарабатываю сильно больше А рядом люди, которые вообще-то помогли мне всё это построить И я прям понял, о каком чувстве он говорит…. Потому что у собственника иногда бывает…

❤59🔥26👍6⚡2🤔1

22 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC≈3,580 views137 reactions2 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Моне 8 лет Вместе с Мамой сделали трекер привычек 🚀🚀🚀 Не знаю как вам передать как много любви и благодарности у меня к миру Надеюсь через наши бизнесы и контент получается передавать хотя бы часть чувств, которыми внутри наполнен Миссия жизни: «Приносит людям пользу и делать наш мир еще лучше» Давайте сделаем это вместе? Семья - источник любви и благодарности Бизнес - способ ими делиться с миром

🔥63❤‍🔥35❤30⚡6👏3

22 Sept 2026, 12:43 UTC≈3,550 views49 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Боишься щекотки?)) Я да😆 и поэтому решил пощекатать наше общее эго предпринимателей Прочтите пост и признайтесь себе честно Болтал как-то с одной девчонкой, озорная такая, Женей зовут, больше $10 млн квартального оборота: — Паш, я на неделю уехала, вернулась и там без меня вообще всё встало))) И вроде она попыталась давануть на жалость и получить сочувствие))) Но по лицу было видно - ей немного приятно😂 Ну а к…

🔥27❤15👍7

21 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC≈3,850 views91 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Всё же верю в миссии в больших компаниях Только не в те, которые висят на сайте рядом со словами: «Мы меняем мир» «Делаем жизнь лучше» «Создаём будущее»))) Я про другое Представьте, что на планёрке вы ставите вопрос не: «Как нам заработать в следующем году 1 млрд?» А: «Скольким людям должно стать реально лучше благодаря нашему продукту, чтобы компания заработала этот миллиард?» И эта цифра резко перестаёт быт…

🔥43❤25💯17⚡2❤‍🔥2👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @potok_gitelman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@potok_gitelman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 September 2026
Most recent edit
11 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTCAnonymous Poll331 voters

Вспомните руководителя, который в итоге не справился. Что вы заметили раньше всего? Самый первый сигнал Отвечайте, если такой опыт был.

  1. Стал медленнее принимать решения10%
  2. Приносил вопросы вместо решений18%
  3. В его отсутствие все вставало8%
  4. Говорил «понял»/«сделаю», но ничего не менялось39%
  5. Провалились цифры15%
  6. Другое, напишу в комментариях3%
  7. Такого опыта не было, просто смотрю результаты36%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTCAnonymous Poll313 voters

Вопрос к предпринимателям. А сколько часов в неделю у вас уходит на задачи, которые на ваш взгляд должна делать команда?

  1. Почти не уходит18%
  2. До 5 часов23%
  3. 5-10 часов18%
  4. 10-20 часов16%
  5. 20-30 часов9%
  6. Больше 30 часов16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 257,396
#1
Oleg Torbosov
@TorbosovLife · 107,412
#2
Sokolovskiy
@sokolay · 109,366
#3
Я — предприниматель
@dashkievpro · 21,205
#4
Оскар Хартманн
@Oskar_Hartmann · 94,059
#5
Маргулан Сейсембай
@MargulanSeissembai · 209,546
#6
Нечто | Сообщество предпринимателей
@nechto_community · 23,360
#7
Павел Гительман: для тех, кому важно развитие
@gitelmania · 10,336
#8
Герман Гаврилов
@german_gavrilov · 18,745
#9
Виталий Крылов - Команда А
@howtomake10x · 17,299
#10
Кутергин в огне 🔥
@kutergin_on_fire · 62,116
#11
MMARGO
@mmargosavchuk · 119,670
#12
Максим Спиридонов
@mspiridonov · 67,058
#13
Бизнес Калашникова
@business_kalashnikova · 6,241
#14
Mikhail Tokovinin
@mtokovinin · 108,209
#15
Артем Сенаторов печатает...
@senatorov_art · 31,240
#16
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 47,331
#17
Андрей Степанов
@truestepanov · 5,039
#18
Корытин выкручивает конверсии
@nmiacm · 60,309
#19
Фокус на бизнес
@nechto_hard · 14,092
#20
История настоящего предпринимателя | Долгов Александр
@StoryTrueBuisness · 13,462
#21
Карина Исхакова
@karinapronastavnichestvo · 19,631
#22
Седа Каспарова
@Seda_Kasparova_news · 257,898
#23
Гай Ричи подписался
@Guy_ri · 2,914
#24
Татьяна Маричева
@tm_producer · 31,346
#25
Белоножко Александр | Главный по CEO
@BelonozhkoAleksandr · 2,991
#26
Евгений Михневич
@strategtelega · 1,362
#27
PODREZ EDUCATION
@podrezeducation · 7,511
#28
Эффективные команды | Павел Гительман
@iGitelman · 1,882
#29
Beyond Taylor
@beyond_taylor · 10,054
#30
Таня Кейн
@tanya_keyn · 7,506
#31
Александр Турчинович
@turchinovich · 8,821
#32
ARIKOVA PRO. ЯРД на AI
@arikovapro · 10,414
#33
Dumik
@dumik · 22,244
#34
Севрюков Вячеслав
@vyacheslav_sevrukov · 2,995
#35
Ольга Паратнова. Руководитель Разумный
@trenerolgaparatnova · 10,492
#36
Канал Артема Дюкарева
@artemdykarevchannel · 4,684
#37
Сергей Косенко
@Kosenkosergei · 57,979
#38
Евгения Dreams✨Лямы🍋в ТГ✨
@evgeniadreams · 9,280
#39
Хайлайты | Журнал про инфобиз и edtech
@infohilights · 21,237
#40
Социальный капитал | Михаил Воронин
@community_tech · 9,734
#41
Нескучные Финансы
@noboring_finance · 65,628
#42
Сергей Иванов из ЭФКО
@sergei_ivanov_efko · 64,145
#43
Владимир Сидоренко
@sidorenkopro · 4,604
#44
Нечто 3
@nechto3 · 5,371
#45
Заметки Ген.Директора
@alexeev_vasiliy · 7,319
#46
Kumar & Solo
@solokumi · 37,553
#47
Club 500
@journal500 · 19,659
#48
Дмитрий Ащепков: Деньги, бизнес, отношения
@aschepkovpro · 4,514
#49
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 79,668
#50
Виктор Галушин: бизнес, ИИ, лайфстайл🎩
@galushinrock · 872
#51
Евгений Фролов про системный бизнес
@frolov_evgenii · 9,475
#52
Нагосмедиа
@nagosmedia · 2,963
#53
Ленивый продюсер. Блог.
@lazyproducer · 25,969
#54
Соколова наизнанку
@naiznankuo · 58,573
#55
Филипп Гузенюк I Счастье в деятельности
@guzenuk · 22,321
#56
АИБ | Ассоциация экспертов в области обучения, предоставляемого посредством интернет-ресурсов
@ainfobis · 3,833
#57
Владимир Моженков. Про бизнес
@vmozhenkov · 7,058
#58
Катерина Ленгольд
@Katerinalengold · 71,428
#59
Игорь Манн
@mann_igor · 29,382
#60
Курбангалиев честно
@chestnome · 5,034
#61
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,297
#62
Дмитрий Ледовских | НейроБизнес
@DmitryLedovskih · 11,369
#63
Артем Кей
@artemmkey · 31,339
#64
Михаил Дашкиев
@mikhaildashkiev · 43,937
#65
Аяз
@AyazShabutdinov · 179,549
#66
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии
@petrosipovprivate · 48,972
#67
Аветов
@avetov · 14,526
#68
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 576,732
#69
Мари, ну что?
@mari_vse · 18,618
#70
SASHA BELAIR
@ab_chat · 134,036
#71
Егор Пыриков
@egorpyrikov · 43,695
#72
Женя Старилова | Про контент
@jane_starilova · 6,797
#73
Crypto Falcon
@falconinvestors · 82,295
#74
Кирилл Фомичев
@fomichevkirill · 28,567
#75
V I V A L A V I K A
@Viva_la_vika · 43,915
#76
Канал Ирины Подрез
@ipodrez · 29,377
#77
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 123,525
#78
Ян Сташкевич
@stashkevichyan · 9,014
#79
Мари про запуски
@mari_zapuski · 75,594
#80
Юлия Ивлиева
@amelisoul_master · 104,420
#81
Христосенко
@easybillions · 5,258
#82
Александр Кравцов | Следующий уровень
@akravtsovcom · 33,179
#83
Мари про новости
@mari_novosti · 6,263
#84
Стас Еговцев
@stas_egovtsev · 7,682
#85
Артем Чубуков
@chubukov_artem · 2,758
#86
Инфоцыганские мемы
@infomem · 8,996
#87
ОЙСАШ🚀
@etosashaaaa · 54,086
#88
Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 60,633
#89
Любовь Женина
@lyubov_zhenina · 586
#90
Hoffman Institute Russia
@hoffmanrussia · 2,503
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Оскар Хартманн
@Oskar_Hartmann · 94,059
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Маргулан Сейсембай
@MargulanSeissembai · 209,546
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Нечто | Сообщество предпринимателей
@nechto_community · 23,360
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
Я — предприниматель
@dashkievpro · 21,205
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 September 2026
Роман Тарасенко
@romarketing · 22,520
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
Артем Кей
@artemmkey · 31,339
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Sokolovskiy
@sokolay · 109,366
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Oleg Torbosov
@TorbosovLife · 107,412
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 257,396
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Михаил Дашкиев
@mikhaildashkiev · 43,937
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии
@petrosipovprivate · 48,972
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Александр Высоцкий
@alexander_visotsky · 36,850
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Максим Батырев
@Maxim_Batyrev · 20,663
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Павел Гительман” (@potok_gitelman), 38,562 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/potok_gitelman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.