Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

100%Шпирт

@Shpirt100

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,367subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744917696
TypeChannel
Username@Shpirt100
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Shpirt100

Growth

5,3065,3675,336.56 August 2026 — 5,331 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,326 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,306 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,367 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,297–5,376 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:545,367+61
9 Aug 2026, 20:125,306-20
6 Aug 2026, 21:405,326-5
6 Aug 2026, 13:375,331first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 5,367 subscribers
Avg views / post
715
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total9,291
Reactions total134
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8735.8%
👍3916.0%
😁3815.6%
💯2711.1%
🔥166.58%
❤‍🔥93.70%
62.47%
41.65%
👌41.65%
😱41.65%
20.823%
😭20.823%
🆒10.412%
🌚10.412%
🍾10.412%
🙏10.412%
🤝10.412%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Shpirt100. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC334 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я долго сюда не писал, накопились серьезные личные дела, да и в паралелли работу никто не отменял. Так вот, передаю вам горячий привет из Вены! Горячий не в переносном смысле, а в прямом - тут недавно было 40 градусов в тени. Сейчас стало чуть полегче. В Вене меня ну каждый раз завораживает архитектура. Множество соборов и дворцов. Тут тебе и готика, и барокко с роккоко, и модерн. Сразу видно что столица бывшей им

17🔥3

31 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC654 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В прошлую субботу участвовал в панели на крайне интересном мероприятии "ГорИИзонты" от Мастерской новых медиа. Тема, как видно из названия, была хайповая - ИИ, его применение и т.п. Панель получилась очень живая, спикеры и модератор - огонь! Получил удовольствие от участия. Коснулись многих тем - и областей применения ИИ-агентов, и внедрение ИИ в бизнес и того, что тормозит внедрение. Но вот одна тема меня зацепила

👍85👌3🌚1

29 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC612 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

"Конец - всему делу венец" или при чем здесь Канеман. Да-да, тот самый Даниэль Канеман, автор "Думай медленно..." и нобелевский лауреат, опытным путем вывел Peak-End Rule. Или, по-нашенски, "Правило пика и конца". В чем его суть? В том, что люди оценивают любое событие или процесс не по их продолжительности или общему эмоциональному фону, а по двум моментам: наиболее яркому эпизоду (пик) и финалу. Эти точки и формир

👍14🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC793 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я знаком с Артемом Агабековым с 2005 года, когда он стал моим клиентом в агентстве. Мы с ним немало общались на разные темы в то время. И сейчас меня очень радует трансформация Артема из циника (как он сам себя характеризовал 20 лет назад) в верующего человека, в котором видна глубина и мудрость. Артем тут дал очень актуальное интервью о том, как жить в неопределенности и постоянном писце кризисе. Мне лично понрави

5👍1🔥1🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 07:36 UTC779 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Собрал типичные отговорки клиентов, когда они зависают. Посмотрите, может что еще не учел? Пишите в комментах ⬇️⬇️⬇️ Что делать чтобы таких зависаний было меньше напишу на следующей неделе.

💯134👍3🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC772 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ребята, под видео с разборами Миши нашего Гребенюка много добрых слов в мой адрес. Народу нравится. Мне, конечно, умные люди давно говорили, что надо делать свой ютюб-канал, но я отлынивал по разным причинам. Одна из них - я точно не знаю, о чем этот канал. Что вам было бы интересно смотреть на моем канале? Про что говорить? Развитие клиентов? Продажи? Разборы чужого сервиса? Буду очень признателен вам за идеи

4

23 Jul 2026, 05:12 UTC800 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вот вы чем вчера занимались? А я вместе с Константином Добровым делал разбор шоу Гребенюка. Того самого, где он рассказывает, как стартапит клинику. Получилось живо и мыслеполезно, имхо. Лайкните и подпишитесь на Костю. https://youtu.be/suzP938VQYs По совету Кости снова стал лежать в направлении своего ютюб-канала😜

7🔥2🍾1🤝1

22 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC733 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Wildberries создаёт симулятор продаж для пострадавших от ударов продавцов — Татьяна Ким. Селлеры будут получать деньги за товары, которых физически нет на складе. Товары будут как будто продавать с той скоростью, ценами и скидками, как если бы они на самом деле продавались. @bankrollo

❤‍🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC714 viewsread 12 August 2026

Достойное решение от Татьяны Ким. Надеюсь это не просто пиар, а реальная поддержка пострадавших селлеров

22 Jul 2026, 06:23 UTC881 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сегодня загорелись еще 2 склада WB. Сеть заполнена видео селлеров, потерявших свой товар на миллионы. И известен также казус с офертой, которую все подписали незадолго до ударов. По ней селлеры не могут получить компенсацию ущерба. Так вот, похоже, не все потеряно. Юристы стартапа LAWGPT, создавшие юридического ИИ-консультанта, уверены, что по закону селлеры все равно могут требовать компенсаций. И сделали даже ИИ-

🔥6👌1

21 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC748 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @digital_caramelPhoto

«Не слушай всех подряд. Доверяй своему внутреннему голосу» – этим принципом Борис Шпирт руководствуется и в работе, и в жизни. Сегодня именно он стал гостем совместной колонки Digital Caramel и Digital Club. Борис – основатель сообщества «Анонимные Аккаунт-менеджеры», автор книги «Отчаянные аккаунт-менеджеры» и бизнес-консультант. В интервью поговорили о том, почему digital-агентствам нужно кардинально менять подход

❤‍🔥7

21 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC698 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тут вашу маму по телевизору показывают... Дал интервью ребятам из Digital Caramel.

🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Shpirt100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 700,738 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“100%Шпирт” (@Shpirt100), 5,367 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shpirt100.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.