Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,942–2,997 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 04:20
2,991
+2
12 Sept 2026, 07:58
2,989
+32
8 Sept 2026, 02:54
2,957
+9
2 Sept 2026, 15:24
2,948
-1
30 Aug 2026, 14:57
2,949
-6
28 Aug 2026, 01:23
2,955
+5
24 Aug 2026, 20:23
2,950
-2
20 Aug 2026, 21:04
2,952
+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:35
2,951
-7
14 Aug 2026, 08:07
2,958
+2
11 Aug 2026, 09:23
2,956
-3
8 Aug 2026, 05:12
2,959
+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:01
2,958
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:58
2,958
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
226 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
76
33.6%
🔥
48
21.2%
❤🔥
42
18.6%
👍
27
11.9%
😁
14
6.19%
👏
10
4.42%
💯
9
3.98%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 9 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BelonozhkoAleksandr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Будь самим собой и всё у тебя будет хорошо!
Этот совет работает, когда ты классный, продуктивный, интересный и т. д. А если ты унылое говно, то лучше пока продолжай притворяться. 🤣
Я вот стал самим собой. И оказалось, что я скучный, нудный, душный, мне всё не нравится, и ещё целый набор качеств, которые не нравятся ни мне, ни окружающим.
Поэтому я пошёл работать над собой. Учиться. Меняться. Делать так, чтобы, ост…
Сообщение от клиента — «2 часа и она написала заявление на перевод на должность исполнительного директора»
67 директор на подходе!
Ребята прошли обучение весной этого года в связке владелец и коммерческий директор. После чего было принято решение растить ком дира и передавать ему управление компании.
Обожаю такие сообщение. Они дают много энергии и бодрости для того чтобы двигаться дальше.
Следующая экскурсия в компанию нашего клиента Антона Рунова!
Мне очень нравится этот формат встреч. Потому что здесь можно увидеть не теорию, а реальную компанию, которая уже прошла определённый путь. Посмотреть, как она устроена изнутри, какие решения сработали и что в итоге получилось.
Антон соучредитель и Генеральный Директор компании «Барс Консалт»
Сегодня в компании работает 64 сотрудника, есть офисы в Казани…
Моя терраса превращается в место предпринимательской силы. Вчера у меня гостили москвичи.
Вова владелец компании Бизнес IT, которая помогает внедрять 1С для бизнеса. А Петр владелец компании Rideaction, которая производит и продает самокаты.
Оба мои клиента, и у обоих сейчас есть директора, чем я очень горжусь. Пили чай, ели орешки и болтали. Люблю когда рабочие моменты перетекают в дружеские🤝
Почему незнакомые люди пишут сообщение в личку и сразу на ТЫ. Для меня это очень странно!
Вначале со всеми надо на ВЫ. Потом можно перейти на ТЫ, но после того как спросил один из участников диалога об этом. Это не ЭГО, это уважение.
За последние две недели очень много было такой комуникации и как я заметил, если сразу пишут на ТЫ, то ничего хорошего из этого не выйдет.
Раз в три месяца мы проводим офлайн-встречи для выпускников ПАЗЛа.
В этот раз решили сделать чуть больше, чем обычно: помимо самой встречи организовали награждение и пригласили не только выпускников, но и предпринимателей, которые разделяют наши ценности, хотя пока ещё не являются клиентами.
Получилось очень тепло и по-настоящему полезно. Именно такие слова я чаще всего слышал после мероприятия. Но две мысли повтор…
Сегодня провели офлайн мероприятие в Питере для выпускников программы ПАЗЛ.
Выступали три спикера с темами про управление, маркетинг и ментальное состояние. А также мы награждали выпускников сертификатами, а тем у кого вырос директор — дарили статуэтку!
Подробности потом с хорошими фотографиями. В пока посмотрите на эти кадры. Я уже стою на двух ногах, но все еще хожу на костылях😅
Живя в Дубае самое крутое, что я там приобрел — это люди. И сейчас живя в России самое большое удовольствие это встречаться с ними здесь.
В Москве я виделся с Смбатом, в Казани с Рустемом м вот сейчас в Питере с Антоном. Так как я на костылях, то Антон приехал ко мне в гости.
Антон соонователь и СЕО сервиса Савви. Это платформа для создания Al-ботов. Вот сайт если интересно - https://suvvy.ai
Мы сейчас делаем с ни…
❤5❤🔥3🔥3👍2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @BelonozhkoAleksandr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Нечто | Сообщество предпринимателей @nechto_community · 23,422 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
Oleg Torbosov @TorbosovLife · 107,515 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Павел Гительман @potok_gitelman · 38,135 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
Михаил Гребенюк @grebenukm · 258,153 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Игорь Манн @mann_igor · 29,383 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
Александр Высоцкий @alexander_visotsky · 36,863 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Михаил Дашкиев @mikhaildashkiev · 43,880 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Александр Кравцов | Следующий уровень @akravtsovcom · 33,200 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Нескучные Финансы @noboring_finance · 65,601 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Олег Шевелев @olegcloser · 35,044 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Белоножко Александр | Главный по CEO” (@BelonozhkoAleksandr), 2,991 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BelonozhkoAleksandr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.