Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Продажи в переписке. Говорухин

Channel

Продажи в переписке. Говорухин

@money_from_text

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,673subscribers

-82 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001156400140
TypeChannel
Username@money_from_text
DescriptionВ маркетинге и продажах с 2011 года. С 2018 развиваю методологию работы с клиентами через мессенджеры. Курс: https://v-govorukhin.ru/course_pp Оргам: https://v-govorukhin.ru/events Регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67909705f3169f6df9fffec0
Created7 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/money_from_text

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,65811,75511,706.57 August 2026 — 11,755 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,755 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,753 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,745 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,740 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,728 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,727 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,723 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,718 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,719 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,722 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,719 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,712 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,709 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,706 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,703 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,709 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,711 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,702 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,701 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,698 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,685 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,673 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,660 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,662 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,661 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,658 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,673 subscribers3 October 2026 — 11,703 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,698 subscribers12 October 2026 — 11,697 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,700 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,680 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,679 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,687 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,689 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,682 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,689 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,686 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,679 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,681 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,673 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,674 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,669 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,673 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,684 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,683 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,673 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,671 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,676 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,680 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,681 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,682 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,681 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,679 subscribers11 November 2026 — 11,673 subscribers11,6737 August 202611 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,643–11,770 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 15:4811,673-6
9 Nov 2026, 17:4611,679-2
8 Nov 2026, 13:1011,681-1
7 Nov 2026, 04:3011,682+1
5 Nov 2026, 05:1111,681+1
3 Nov 2026, 07:0911,680+4
2 Nov 2026, 07:5611,676+5
1 Nov 2026, 11:3011,671-2
30 Oct 2026, 14:5611,673-10
29 Oct 2026, 16:1811,683-1
28 Oct 2026, 13:3511,684+11
27 Oct 2026, 13:2111,673+4
26 Oct 2026, 14:4711,669-5
25 Oct 2026, 16:5411,674+1
24 Oct 2026, 14:0911,673-8
23 Oct 2026, 17:0811,681+2
22 Oct 2026, 17:2911,679-7
21 Oct 2026, 16:1211,686-3
20 Oct 2026, 09:5111,689+7
19 Oct 2026, 13:0411,682first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 11,673 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held56 (18 June 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total18,668
Reactions total249
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 09:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
441
Videos
178
Links
654

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 35s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,889 reactions across 54 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍59331.4%
🔥58130.8%
❤52527.8%
❤‍🔥1417.46%
😁261.38%
🙏90.476%
🤯80.424%
😍40.212%
🎉20.106%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,889 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 56 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @money_from_text. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.79%
1 of 56 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
413
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,680
over 55 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzqud7ZHM12 September 20262 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 13 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (60.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC307 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Делаем тоже самое, но результаты не те. Пример: Лидер рынка радуется 3 лидам в месяц, которые приходят через разрыв жопы команды. Прежние схемы лидогенерации не дают выхлопа. При этом акционеры компании продолжают покупать новую недвижимость и увеличивать капитал, ибо платные школы для детей стоят дорого. Базовые диджитал каналы продвижения схлопываются, а клиенты внимательно считают деньги перед покупкой. К чем…

❤6👍3

12 Nov 2026, 08:12 UTC562 views18 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

B2B прейсейлы 2027 года. ИИ агенты договариваются о содержании работ и бюджете.

😁14❤2🔥1🤯1

10 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC769 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Осталось 1 место на аудит системы продаж.

👍1

7 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,110 views34 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Константин Бакшт. Легенда консалтингового-тренинга рынка. Последний раз видел его в 2013 году. Бодрость и энергия по прежнему на максималках. Сегодня выступили для предпринимателей Краснодара.

👍17🔥10❤6❤‍🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,090 views22 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

33 часа в дороге и я в Краснодаре. Завтра выступление. «Тренды продаж. Что делать вот с этим вот всем».

❤11🔥9👍2

2 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,430 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Поиск новых денег и зон роста отдела продаж. При падении входящего лидгена есть 2 точки воздействия: 1. Качество работы с новыми заявками. 2. Повторные продажи в ту же базу. Начиная с лета плотно окунулся в проекты по прокачке продаж. Где-то падение лидгена существенное, где-то клиенты не спешат расставаться с деньгами. Где-то ИИ шаблоны дали скорость, но стали отпугивать клиентов и ронять конверсию. В ноябре воз…

🔥9❤1

30 Oct 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,190 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Как смазать механизм принятия решения в B2B Если вы продаете "снизу", а не через главного босса. Проверить свое коммерческое предложение на 2 параметра: 1. То, что мы предлагаем создает необходимость больше работать людям на местах? 2. То, что мы предлагаем не ломает ли приоритет действий по текущим планам сотрудников влияющие на их KPI и премии? Если ответ да, то сделки будут застревать именно из-за этого. Хотя…

🔥8❤5

29 Oct 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,340 views50 reactions1 Starread 13 November 2026

Техники продаж профи. Чем сложнее сделки, тем важнее фундамент в виде навыков и черт характера нежели инструментов. Книга про "продвинутые техники продаж" на самом деле должна быть написана об этих вещах: Исследования. Уметь копать информацию с разных сторон чтобы сложить максимальное понимание клиента. Причина проблем в сделках "мало знаем о клиенте". Комплименты. Клиент получающий удовольствие от диалога с прод…

🔥32❤12👍6

29 Oct 2026, 05:06 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 13 November 2026

Какие задачи сейчас решаете с нейронками в своих отделах продаж? Что реально внедрилось?

23 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 13 November 2026

Есть кто-то кто развивает/продает платформы смс рассылок? Есть вопрос по функционалу. Задача отправлять пользователю платформы смс с возможностью ответа. Распознавать тип ответа и пробрасывать метку в crm. Это реализуемо сейчас с учетом правил?

22 Oct 2026, 05:26 UTC≈1,700 views22 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Прямые вопросы для управления сделкой. В процессе встречи/зума или ключевого звонка кроме потребностей и рассказа о продукте сразу же прояснять отношение к сделке. Вопросы могут быть разными в зависимости от ниши, но чем прямее тем лучше. Сроки Если по бюджету наше предложение пройдет, готовы стартовать в октябре? Насколько задача сейчас стоит остро? Деньги Назвать вилку цен или точную цену если возможно, спросит…

🔥17❤5

20 Oct 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,490 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Кому после оплаты не пришли материалы напишите @vgovorukhin Сервисы и боты работают нестабильно пока.

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @money_from_text. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @money_from_text as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
6 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Олег Шевелев
@olegcloser · 35,486
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи
@ryzov_igor · 46,714
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Владимир Якуба
@vyakuba · 49,073
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Виталий Голицын
@VitalyGolitzyn · 26,732
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Максим Батырев
@Maxim_Batyrev · 20,702
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
Радислав Гандапас
@radislavgandapascom · 52,898
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Гений переговоров | Ольга Грищенко
@kotperegovor · 42,758
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Игорь Манн
@mann_igor · 27,429
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
Трус Юлия про бизнес
@trusprobusiness · 36,911
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Маша Полуянова
@mashapoluyanova · 63,659
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Битрикс24 для бизнеса
@bitrix24_ru · 29,024
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Инструменты маркетолога
@profit_maker · 45,361
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 251,213
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Маркетинг. Александра Гуреева
@alexandra_gureeva · 21,283
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 September 2026
Румянцев Рулит
@drumyanzev · 22,128
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
Фадеевщина | ffad.ru
@ffadru · 25,757
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 September 2026
Регулярный менеджмент для руководителей (Евгений Севастьянов)
@regularmanagement · 22,749
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Света Афанасьева
@engageforsales · 28,382
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 46,480
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Продажи в переписке. Говорухин” (@money_from_text), 11,673 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/money_from_text.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.