Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Молянов

Channel

Молянов

@molyanov_blog

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,096subscribers

+1,056 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559006862
TypeChannel
Username@molyanov_blog
DescriptionОсновал «Сделаем» и Нейроцех, запускаю соло-проекты с помощью нейросетей. Верю, что ИИ изменит мир Реклама на канале — @molyanov_ad_bot Консультирую — https://molyanov.ru/consultations Моя личка — @paul_molyanov РКН: https://tinyurl.com/yklphokh
Created26 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/molyanov_blog

Growth

29,04030,22629,6336 August 2026 — 29,040 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,040 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,318 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,456 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,516 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,545 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,653 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,733 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,833 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,226 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,165 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,178 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,131 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,132 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,105 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,096 subscribers30,0966 August 202620 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 14 days, net +1,056. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,862–30,404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 10:1630,096-9
19 Aug 2026, 13:0230,105-27
18 Aug 2026, 14:3630,132+1
17 Aug 2026, 15:3530,131-47
16 Aug 2026, 07:0830,178+13
14 Aug 2026, 21:1430,165-61
13 Aug 2026, 13:2930,226+393
12 Aug 2026, 12:0329,833+100
11 Aug 2026, 11:1229,733+80
10 Aug 2026, 13:2529,653+108
9 Aug 2026, 15:2129,545+29
8 Aug 2026, 13:3429,516+60
7 Aug 2026, 11:0029,456+138
6 Aug 2026, 11:2429,318+278
6 Aug 2026, 02:0029,040no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:5229,040first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 30,096 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,280
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held57 (31 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total186,940
Reactions total5,336
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,060
Videos
118
Links
1,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
24s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,215 reactions across 55 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,46528.1%
😁1,19422.9%
1,13621.8%
💯3727.13%
👍3286.29%
custom 63255747434580560462274.35%
💩1613.09%
🤔881.69%
😎711.36%
🫡671.28%
🗿350.671%
👎340.652%
🍌120.23%
🤪80.153%
😱60.115%
🦄60.115%
👀50.096%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,336reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 57 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @molyanov_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC≈1,360 views118 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Минутка диванной психологии Призываю меня не слушать, всерьез не воспринимать, перед применением поста проконсультироваться с врачом Почему люди выгорают? Люди выгорают от потери смысла в том, что делают. Когда ты долго делаешь какой-то проект, вкладываешь в него душу, решаешь все проблемы, со всеми договариваешься, пытаешься победить всеобщее безразличие, делаешь, делаешь, тащишь… А ОН НЕ ВЗЛЕТАЕТ!!! УУУУУ СЪКА

68🔥24💯13👍6😁2😎2💩1🤔1

19 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,290 views63 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Я тут гайдик накидал, как делать ИИ-фотки, выложил на Хабре Го читать → https://habr.com/ru/articles/1072142/ Как вы помните, весной я делал тг-бота для ИИ-фотосетов @imagine_picbot. Боту уже 3 месяца, в нем почти 5000 человек, каждый день даже по несколько оплат капает, то есть им даже пользуются. Живые люди. По своей воле. Прикиньте! Чтобы его сделать, я перегенерил около 2 тысяч портретов — себя, знакомых, а по

🔥25custom 63255747434580560461713👍2💩2💯2🫡1😎1

19 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC≈2,290 views52 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Позавчера мы в Нейроцехе закончили четвертый поток интенсива по вайбкодингу. Как обычно получили много классных отзывов от людей, которые поняли, сколько всего увлекательного можно делать с помощью агентов И среди отзывов стабильно мелькают: «я с восторге от вайбкодинга, начал делать всякие небольшие штуки, хочу развиваться и прокачиваться дальше, чтобы делать штуки посерьезнее. Как?» И действительно, легко делать

🔥3010👍4😎2custom 63255747434580560462👀1💩1🫡1

18 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC≈2,880 views117 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026

Взялся за амбициозный проект — ИИ-финансист Собираем выгрузки из всех банков, счетов и касс Собираем выгрузки из Планфикса о проектах, задачах, выплатах подрядчикам Собираем отчеты от сотрудников — где чьи подрядчики, кто что заказывал и так далее Метчим и нормализуем Фигачим pnl, ддс, считаем дивиденды, анализируем расхождения плана и факта, дергаем ответственных сотрудников в чате, чтобы ответили на вопросы и до

🔥67😁1917custom 63255747434580560466👍3💩2💯2🫡1

18 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈2,950 views68 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

Полностью обновил свое расширение для поиска битых ссылок → https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/broken-link-checker/cipdlgmjblnniiicohcmcafcncippbha Починил несколько багов, которые нашли пользователи Добавил несколько новых фильтров и настроек Обновил интерфейс Ну и самое главное Добавил монетизацию! Для России она отключена, вам все бесплатно, а у всяких американцев, японцев и западноевропейцев расширение б

🔥3412👍8😁5💩3🗿2😎2👎1

18 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈2,770 views98 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

Зачем надо вести секонд-брейн и документацию проектов Считаю, что это пример прям показательный Мы вчера с Егором созванивались, обсуждали 3 страницы сайта. Надо их сделать. Если чет непонятно по ходу, спрашивай Это вся инструкция, что я дал агенту. Весь промт, так сказать. И этого достаточно, чтобы он сделал что надо. Потому что агент: 1. Знает, что перед началом любой работы надо почитать документацию проекта

42🔥26💩8🍌5👍5👎5custom 63255747434580560464💯1

18 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC≈2,710 views94 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Вчера/недавно/год назад была новость, которую разнесли по всем Телеграм каналам Один предприниматель/сотрудник компании что-то учудил/написал в соцсетях — и за это на него обрушился гнев общественности Все это обсуждают, и я не могу остаться в стороне Моя официальная позиция по этому вопросу такова: Пофигу максимально. В мире очень много дурачков и неадекватов, творящих полную фигню, и хайпожоров, специально выст

🔥3623😁17custom 63255747434580560468👍3💩3😎3👎1

17 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈2,680 views169 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Погнали разбираться, как лутать охваты на ugc-площадках 1. Выучите наизусть мантру «Мой бизнес и я лично нахрен никому не упал». И повторяйте ее каждый раз, когда хотите выложить на Хабре очередной кейс, новость о своем продукте, «доказательство экспертности» и прочее. Люди не ходят в интернет, чтобы прочитать про вашу компанию. Они ходят в интернет, чтобы весело провести время. Или вы их развлекаете, или вас никто

80🔥60👍19😁3👎2💩1💯1🤔1

17 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈2,800 views466 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Итак, это официально самая пиздатая статья, которую я писал в жизни 105к охват на Хабре и 43к на Виси 500!!! комментариев на Хабре и под 300 на Виси 2000 человек зашли на мой сайт в день публикации. Обычно заходит по 200 чел. На сайтах Сделаема и Нейроцеха тоже есть пики, но поменьше. В Нейроцехе аномалия примерно в 100 человек, в Сделаем — в 400 Статью я написал за 20 минут. Это вообще должен был быть пост в ка

🔥292custom 63255747434580560467967👍17😎6🫡2😁2💩1

17 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈2,870 views54 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Сегодня мы с другим вайбкодером-агентоводом настраивали всякие совместные штуки Он просит своего Клода написать инструкцию, что надо сделать Я отдаю ее своему Кодексу, он делает, отчитывается Чувак передает это Клоду Ну и так далее Забавное конечно ощущение, что я не сеньор, раздающий указания помощникам-агентам. Я ассистент Кодекса, хаха, по совместительству подрабатывающий сотрудником службы безопасности, блок

😁2713👍5💯3🔥3💩1🫡1😎1

16 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈3,340 views95 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

В Стамбуле есть супер популярный десерт, который обожают и турки, и туристы — сан-себастьян Это такой здоровенный чизкейк с корочкой. На севере Испании есть город с аналогичным названием, в котором собственно этот чизкейк и изобрели И это просто невероятный город! Во-первых, он очень красивый. Европейская архитектура 19 века, разбавленная огромным количеством зелени повсюду, все это на берегу Атлантичекого океана

🔥5826👍7🦄2👎1🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC≈3,650 views108 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Еще пачка смешных комментов появилась Комментаторы находят мои сайты, которые делали люди, и засирают их — мол, ну полное же говнище, баги сплошные, косяки, нарушения, выглядит стремно Тем самым… как бы так помягче сказать… Подтверждают все, что я написал в статье 😆 Обожаю такие холивары! Прям скучаю по славным временам, когда можно было каждую неделю статью на виси пулять — и подобный движ провоцировать

😁73🔥17😎75💩2💯2🫡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @molyanov_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@molyanov_blog edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTCAnonymous Poll471 voters

Вы хотите, чтобы наступила технологическая сингулярность? Пишите в комментах, почему

  1. Да, это приведет человечество к лучшему будущему12%
  2. Да, это будет интересно18%
  3. Сомневаюсь, но скорее да7%
  4. Сомневаюсь, но скорее нет8%
  5. Нет, мне это неинтересно1%
  6. Нет, это породит много проблем15%
  7. Не знаю, что такое технологическая сингулярность31%
  8. Не верю, что она достижима в принципе8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,966 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Павликов опять что-то написал
@potok_ads · 73,763
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
Главред Максим Ильяхов
@glvrdru · 69,537
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
Корнеев | Первый Маркетинговый
@pervmarketing · 139,048
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM
@dnative · 82,618
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 August 2026
Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 154,848
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 175,621
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
Т-Бизнес секреты
@bs_business · 70,603
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
👨🏻‍💻/ Марат Юсупов
@maratyus · 104,003
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Яндекс для предпринимателей
@yandexbusiness · 79,229
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Записки редакторки
@zapiski_redaktorki · 95,014
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
TGStat.ru — Аналитика Telegram-каналов и чатов
@TGStat · 130,491
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Норм работа
@normrabota · 129,783
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026
Ждём резюме l Лайфхакер
@zdemcv · 75,920
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Молянов” (@molyanov_blog), 30,096 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/molyanov_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.