Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Аветов

@avetov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,684subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001287584362
TypeChannel
Username@avetov
Description▫️Предприниматель, кандидат экономических наук ▫️ Организатор крупнейшего бизнес события в мире - Мегакампус саммит Саммит. Скоро. 👇 https://summit.megacampus.ru/c/tg Сотрудничество: @annaxweber Регистрация в реестре РКН
Created17 November 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/avetov

Growth

14,68414,73914,711.56 August 2026 — 14,738 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,739 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,728 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,723 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,710 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,699 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,691 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,688 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,684 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,676–14,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:1614,684-4
12 Aug 2026, 05:1214,688-3
11 Aug 2026, 08:4314,691-8
10 Aug 2026, 06:0814,699-11
9 Aug 2026, 07:5414,710-13
8 Aug 2026, 05:3514,723-5
7 Aug 2026, 08:5414,728-11
6 Aug 2026, 08:4014,739+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:0414,738first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 14,684 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,510
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held24 (20 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total36,250
Reactions total1,003
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
872
Videos
159
Links
498

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,003 reactions across 24 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁32132.0%
27727.6%
🔥23223.1%
👍15915.9%
🤬100.997%
👎40.399%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,003reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 24 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @avetov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
8.33%
2 of 24 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,280
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,470
over 22 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqxMGzbt129 July 202629 July 2026
2W5zFHptvCh122 July 202622 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,250 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Открываю вакансии 1. РОП 2. Менеджер по работе с VIP-клиентами 3. Руководитель фабрики блогеров 4. Монтажер Если вы сильны в своём деле и хотите работать с масштабным проектом - заполняйте анкету: РОП→ анкета Менеджер по работе с VIP-клиентами→ анкета Руководитель фабрики блогеров→ анкета Монтажер→ анкета Рассмотрим каждую анкету. И если вы знаете такого человека - перешлите ему этот пост.

👍1

10 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,460 views122 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Сегодня в офисе прорвало канализационную трубу. Затопило весь офис нечистотами. Эвакуировали всю команду и непонятно выйдем ли завтра. Похоже, вселенная поняла меня слишком буквально когда я на каждом совещании требовал прорыва.

😁95🔥216

10 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈1,220 views70 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Лист бумаги, карандаш, 5-7 ключевых задач на день. Ни одна CRM и задачник в мире так не помогает мне держать в фокусе самое главное.

👍3520🔥15

9 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,380 views92 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Иногда Бог не хочет, чтобы ты вырос. На этой неделе проводил несколько встреч с большими ребятами, которые сейчас находятся под серьезным давлением. Ряд очень больших проектов, которые они на себя взяли, оказался с «побочными эффектами». Первые несколько лет — деньги, статус, слава. Последние годы — давление со всех сторон с рисками потери здоровья, свободы и капитала. Причём там не всегда ошибки внутри. В одном и

59🔥29👍4

4 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC≈1,910 views54 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Тупик сансары для малого бизнеса. Мало денег, потому что не хватает компетенций. Чтобы поднять уровень компетенций - требуется нанять более дорогих сотрудников. Но на это не хватает денег. Выходом из тупика может стать, только сильная культура, которая станет компенсацией, пока компания набирает обороты.

👍2317🔥14

2 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC≈2,000 views116 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

Вчера ехал на такси и увидел, как мой водитель конфликтует с двумя охранниками-бугаями из микроавтобуса. Что-то они друг друга подрезали, и, когда поравнялись на светофоре, начали выяснять отношения. Я моментально решил: если будет драка - я на стороне водителя. Во-первых, потому что он слабее; во-вторых, мы с ним, как-будто, в одной команде. На секунду я критически оценил своё решение со стороны - холодным, рассуд

😁86🔥1110👍9

31 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,760 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥1716😁13

31 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,070 views30 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Как вы знаете, эти месяцы оказались для нас очень непростыми. Но вместо того, чтобы бежать с высунутым языком и продавать что-нибудь кому-нибудь, восполняя финансовые потери от перенесённого саммита, мы сфокусировались на работе с культурой, бизнес-моделью и основной идеей компании. Всё, что я написал в предыдущем посте про основную идею — результат этой работы за несколько месяцев. Перечитайте, там суть. Теперь х

20👍10

30 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,770 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Чем отличаются великие компании от обычных? Саймон Синек рассказывал, что есть три вопроса, на которые должен ответить ваш бизнес: • Что мы продаем? • Как мы это продаем? • Зачем мы это продаем? Вы уже догадались: обычные компании отвечают именно в таком порядке, а великие начинают с конца. Сначала «зачем», потом «как» и только потом «что». Хрестоматийный пример — Apple при Джобсе. Они не говорили, что делают кра

🔥14👍107

29 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,250 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

7😁7

29 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,260 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Купил новый видеомагнитофон

6

29 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,540 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Открываю две вакансии SMM-специалист - Развивать соцсети Мегакампуса и мои личные. YouTube-продюсер - развивать ютуб каналы и выстроить систему. Если вы сильны в своём деле и хотите работать с масштабным проектом - заполняйте анкету: SMM-специалист → анкета YouTube-продюсер → анкета Рассмотрим каждую анкету. И если вы знаете такого человека - перешлите ему этот пост.

8🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @avetov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,709 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 263,110
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Маргулан Сейсембай
@MargulanSeissembai · 211,660
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Аяз
@AyazShabutdinov · 181,116
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Оперштаб Игорь Рыбаков
@rybakovigor · 152,050
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аветов” (@avetov), 14,684 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avetov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.