Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM

@dnative

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

83,145subscribers

-729 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001096245320
TypeChannel
Username@dnative
Created10 November 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dnative

Growth

83,14583,87583,5105 August 2026 — 83,874 subscribers6 August 2026 — 83,874 subscribers6 August 2026 — 83,875 subscribers7 August 2026 — 83,823 subscribers7 August 2026 — 83,796 subscribers8 August 2026 — 83,758 subscribers9 August 2026 — 83,690 subscribers10 August 2026 — 83,633 subscribers11 August 2026 — 83,579 subscribers13 August 2026 — 83,145 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -729. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83,036–83,985 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:4583,145-434
11 Aug 2026, 22:4383,579-54
10 Aug 2026, 23:2283,633-57
9 Aug 2026, 20:5383,690-68
8 Aug 2026, 20:1383,758-38
7 Aug 2026, 22:3383,796-27
7 Aug 2026, 00:4383,823-52
6 Aug 2026, 02:4083,875+1
6 Aug 2026, 01:3483,874no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0683,874first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.52%
avg views ÷ 83,145 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,090
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held14 (23 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total99,230
Reactions total2,233
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,127 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79137.2%
🤣51724.3%
🔥2119.92%
👍1677.85%
🤡1235.78%
😢1105.17%
🤯763.57%
🗿391.83%
💩371.74%
💔180.846%
🤬130.611%
🤮110.517%
😎70.329%
😍40.188%
😱20.094%
👎10.047%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,233reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dnative. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC≈4,470 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Могут ли бренды использовать мемы? На неделе завирусился мем «и Владу». Если вы вне контекста, то Екатерина, фитнес-тренер, почти год снимает Рилсы про еду в формате «себе и Владу», где Владу достаётся порция объёмом в «ведро еды». Это если коротко объяснить суть. Таких роликов было много и фраза «и Владу» просто была стандартной в каждом видео, пока интернет не расфорсил её и не превратил в мем. Бренды начали зале

59👍14🔥2😱2💔1🤬1

6 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC≈5,980 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Обновление в духе «давно пора»? Если что, я вообще не про контекстную рекламу, поэтому не кидайте тапками. Но всегда казалось логичным, что если реклама приводит клиентов к звонку, то это должно быть видно прямо внутри рекламной платформы. И вот на на днях Директ выкатил бесплатный динамический коллтрекинг, отслеживающий звонки из объявлений в поиске Яндекса, при продвижении в десктопной версии Яндекс Карт, а также

👍31🔥2212💩11😍1

6 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈6,450 views180 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Хочу больше такого SMM Обычно такие кейсы читаешь про западные компании. Какой-нибудь бренд что-то не то отправил, юзер записал про это виральный видос, бренд весело отработал, все получили внимание и респекты. А вот свежайший примерчик из нашей действительности. Два дня назад Слава выкладывает Рилс, где поделился историей, что ему ВкусВилл всё время не докладывает сахар в кофе и он просит сборщика положить пару п

123🔥35👍13🤣5💩2💔1😎1

4 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC≈7,940 views264 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#КорзинаВБ Думается мне это первая такая массовая рекламная кампания, про которую я прочитал 0 позитива и 100% негативных обсуждений. Тысячи (или больше?) баннеров с медийными лицами и блогерами, которые призывают поддержать предпринимателей в стране, где покупательская способность падает не первый месяц. Я писал пост раньше про то, что ВБ тоже пострадавшая сторона в ситуации уничтожения их складов, от своего мнен

183👍36💩20🤣15🔥7🗿3

3 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC≈6,400 views144 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что делать с хейтом? Я большой любитель обсуждать и осуждать неправильную работу брендов в интернетах. Ну а кто, если не я? Принёс вам пример, что можно делать в случае недовольства пользователей. Пример из Дагестана, где производитель газировки провёл ребрендинг и он зашёл далеко не всем. Я не в курсе локальных брендов, но как понял, Deneb — это культовый лимонад в Дагестане и многие его любят из детства. А если

77🔥40👍23🗿4

31 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈7,490 views139 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Реалити про Джигана и Оксану Самойлову я пропустил и не смотрел, но что я точно слышал про него, так то, что Джига, оказывается, нормальный мужик. И что продакт-плейсмент Ozon был в каждой серии. Сегодня как раз увидел свежий кейс про эту интеграцию в шоу на AdIndex. Так вот, Ozon в среднем появился в кадре 69 раз за сезон, а суммарная продолжительность его присутствия составила 1 час 21 минуту 🤯 Всего шоу собрало

62🤣57🔥15💩4🤯1

30 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC≈8,570 views217 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пу-пу-пу

🤣106😢55🤯28💔14🗿122

30 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC≈8,490 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вайбворкинг Ох как хотелось бы работать через нейронку, но так, чтобы никто об этом не знал. Кидаешь в неё «сделай рубрикатор по брифу», он тебе фигак делает, ты фигак клиенту отдаёшь, он фигак согласовал и денег заплатил. Идиллия! Токма возникает вопрос, а зачем в этой цепочечке я, если моя функция нивелируется до «пнуть нейронку»? А не нужен я тут буду. Одно хорошо, так (пока) НЕ РАБОТАЕТ. Точнее можно пнуть ней

🔥4219👍17😍3

29 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC≈6,770 views183 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Давайте актуальные анекдоты травить, чё ещё делать остаётся Звонок в техподдержку — Здравствуйте, у меня не работает интернет. — Работает. — Но ничего не открывается. — Так это и значит, что работает. ———————————— Слайд с выбором соцсетей для присутствия в SMM-стратегии. (это уже само по себе смешно, как будто бы у нас есть выбор) ———————————— Что общего у Цукерберга и моего интернета? Формально оба не запреще

🤣13718🔥17😢7🤡3💔1

29 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC≈7,080 views302 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Смотри не запутайся. Meta признана экстремистской организацией и запрещена на территории РФ. Марк Цукерберг, её глава и основатель, не признан — ему только запрещён въезд в Россию. Instagram принадлежит Meta, признанной экстремистской организацией и запрещённой на территории РФ, но Адам Моссери, глава Instagram, никакой ответственности не несёт. Facebook тоже принадлежит Meta, признанной экстремистской организацие

132🤡90🔥27🤣17🤬12🤯9😎6👍4

29 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC≈6,910 views262 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ну теперь Telegram точно разбанят

🤣170😢48🤡23🗿17👍31

28 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC≈7,430 views55 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Про Шопсы Я обычно с осторожностью смотрю на статистику в духе «что-то выросло в 10 раз»: без исходной базы такие цифры могут означать что угодно. Но в свежих итогах шопсов ВКонтакте есть и более понятный ориентир — 4 млн заказов товаров Ozon из авторского контента за полгода. Это уже не относительный рост, а вполне осязаемый объем. Как минимум это произошло за счёт роста количества продавцов Ozon в 10 раз на плат

35🤮7👍6🗿3🔥2🤡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dnative. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 10,570 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 155,877
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
коллеги, не сутультесь
@bardachko · 567,567
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Семейка ботов
@FamilyBots · 704,200
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
Красный маркетинг Гиязова
@aaaredmarketing · 280,357
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 175,891
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
LiFe в кайф▪️Турбомама
@turbomama · 171,745
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
Мемы без надписей | видео шаблоны для рилс
@membeztexta · 188,549
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 193,079
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 157,148
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Мемперия Катерины Побоженко | Шаблоны и оригиналы | Мемы в REELS
@formemas · 185,821
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Finder.work: работа и вакансии
@theyseeku · 275,212
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
бумеры смотрят телек
@boomers_TV · 162,506
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM” (@dnative), 83,145 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnative.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.