Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Олег Шевелев

Channel

Олег Шевелев

@olegcloser

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

35,032subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001146512808
TypeChannel
Username@olegcloser
DescriptionРекорды в продажах, бизнесе и жизни. Отделы продаж, прокачка, ИИ. Кандидат наук, автор книги «Рекорды продаж», YouTube: 300k+ Задать вопрос @rasti_bz https://rasti.bz А+ Включена РКН https://clck.ru/3LQ2mn #3KO1J
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olegcloser

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,88435,06234,9736 August 2026 — 34,979 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,979 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,975 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,965 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,969 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,968 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,964 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,968 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,950 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,930 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,923 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,891 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,897 subscribers19 August 2026 — 34,884 subscribers20 August 2026 — 34,903 subscribers22 August 2026 — 34,978 subscribers24 August 2026 — 35,009 subscribers25 August 2026 — 34,998 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,000 subscribers27 August 2026 — 34,998 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,001 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,023 subscribers29 August 2026 — 35,012 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,022 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,021 subscribers2 September 2026 — 35,016 subscribers4 September 2026 — 35,024 subscribers6 September 2026 — 35,047 subscribers10 September 2026 — 35,062 subscribers12 September 2026 — 35,042 subscribers13 September 2026 — 35,057 subscribers15 September 2026 — 35,048 subscribers17 September 2026 — 35,044 subscribers27 September 2026 — 35,032 subscribers35,0326 August 202627 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,857–35,089 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 05:4035,032-12
17 Sept 2026, 14:1535,044-4
15 Sept 2026, 14:4135,048-9
13 Sept 2026, 20:5835,057+15
12 Sept 2026, 06:5535,042-20
10 Sept 2026, 03:5935,062+15
6 Sept 2026, 19:1835,047+23
4 Sept 2026, 06:0135,024+8
2 Sept 2026, 21:4735,016-5
1 Sept 2026, 22:2735,021-1
1 Sept 2026, 01:4535,022+10
29 Aug 2026, 19:5535,012-11
28 Aug 2026, 23:0335,023+22
27 Aug 2026, 22:4435,001+3
27 Aug 2026, 01:1234,998-2
26 Aug 2026, 03:5435,000+2
25 Aug 2026, 05:1434,998-11
24 Aug 2026, 00:0535,009+31
22 Aug 2026, 08:1534,978+75
20 Aug 2026, 20:2434,903first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.97%
avg views ÷ 35,032 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,440
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.615%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held63 (26 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total65,880
Reactions total405
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 06:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,440
Videos
≈393
Links
≈674

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
23m 30s
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

913 reactions across 61 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆66072.3%
⚡909.86%
❤758.21%
👍485.26%
😁353.83%
😐30.329%
😎10.11%
🙈10.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 933 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 63 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olegcloser. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTC≈1,520 views6 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Poll

Как дела с продажами в сентябре?

  1. Полный провал, спад 😞42%
  2. Держимся на том же уровне 😐40%
  3. Ставим рекорды! 🏆17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🏆3😐3

28 Sept 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,690 views21 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

ТОП-3 за что люди готовы платить всегда. Особенно первый пункт, вообще универсальный. Вокруг этого строятся продажи во многих бизнесах. А третий пункт — это обычно про премиум, люкс (чтобы продавать дорого). Проверьте, учитываете ли вы это в системе продаж.

⚡11👍7🏆2❤1

24 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC≈2,300 views21 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Voice message

🎙 Работайте с исходниками, а не с интерпретациями Многие предприниматели и руководители не любят погружаться в продажи и спрашивают у менеджеров, почему клиенты не покупают. В ответ слышат «клиентам дорого», «не сезон», «сейчас везде рынок упал...» В подкасте разбираю принцип, который помогает предпринимателям расти быстрее: – почему ответы менеджеров — это интерпретация, а не факт, и чем это опасно, – почему «к…

⚡8🏆8👍4❤1

24 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,870 views11 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

На новом уровне дохода вам не нужно будет делать 80% того, что вы делаете сейчас. Представляете: действия, которые заполняют ваш день сейчас и формируют ваш текущий доход, на следующем уровне просто не нужны. Поэтому главное сейчас – перестать делать лишнее и начать делать новое для роста. И это самое сложное. Сегодня провел первую встречу с предпринимателями из премиум-группы ПРОКАЧКИ (строительство домов, компрес…

🏆8⚡3

23 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC≈2,030 views12 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

«Сегодня обучал отдел этому. По вашей системе! Огонь 🔥» Моя система включает: 1. Воронку продаж с сильным конвертором (сильный конвертер — это главное событие, на которое клиенты легко соглашаются и после которого легко покупают) 2. Два оффера: первый на сильный конвертер, второй — на сам продукт. Именно такая комбинация дает высокую конверсию 3. Формулу 100% закрытия сделки из 5 критериев. Каждую сделку обязател…

🏆10⚡1❤1

22 Sept 2026, 11:44 UTC≈2,170 views15 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

АЛГОРИТМ ВЫХОДА НА РЕКОРДЫ (каждый квартал начинайте с этого) В этом видео я разложил по полочкам все шаги, которые может сделать каждый предприниматель, самозанятый, эксперт, чтобы выйти на рекорды: 1) факт сейчас по выручке / прибыли 2) динамика (падение, стагнация, слабый рост, сильный рост) 3) цель квартала исходя из стратегического видения предпринимателя 4) стратегическое видение А также рассказал про точ…

❤11⚡4

20 Sept 2026, 07:38 UTC≈2,470 views27 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

На этой неделе, пока я несколько дней находился в Ростове-на-Дону, десятки участников стартовали в новой группе ПРОКАЧКИ продаж с ИИ. Хочу показать вам процесс прокачки изнутри и несколько скринов из чата: "Продаю интуитивно, сложно работать в холодную" "Клиенты теряются после отправки КП" "Воронки фактически нет, продажи спонтанные" Большинство продает интуитивно. И часто это означает, что есть большой потенциал …

🏆12❤9⚡6

15 Sept 2026, 09:34 UTC≈2,900 views14 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня мои лучшие обученные ИИ-агенты начинают прокачивать системы продаж в 75+ новых бизнесах — стартует новая группа участников ПРОКАЧКИ продаж с ИИ. Впереди 3 недели работы. И у многих эти 3 недели полностью поменяют продажи. "Как я продавал все эти годы? Надо вообще по-другому" – это частый вывод уже на первой неделе прокачки (после воронки, оффера и моей авторской формулы 100% сделки). Обязательно расскажу ва…

⚡6🏆4👍2😎1🙈1

15 Sept 2026, 09:25 UTC≈2,480 views2 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🏆2

15 Sept 2026, 09:25 UTC≈2,480 views2 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🏆2

15 Sept 2026, 09:25 UTC≈2,350 views6 reactionsread 29 September 2026

👆 А вот так создаются сильные инструменты продаж с помощью ИИ агентов, которых я обучил своей системе продаж.

⚡6

15 Sept 2026, 09:25 UTC≈2,550 views3 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🏆3

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @olegcloser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTCAnonymous Poll502 voters

Как дела с продажами в сентябре?

  1. Полный провал, спад 😞42%
  2. Держимся на том же уровне 😐40%
  3. Ставим рекорды! 🏆17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTCAnonymous Poll203 voters

Как думаете, что самое неэффективное в ваших продажах сейчас?

  1. Зависшие думают неделями 💭37%
  2. Работа с базой вообще не ведётся 😶‍🌫️18%
  3. Продаем в ноль или в минус лишь бы купили 🫠9%
  4. Нет нормальных менеджеров, РОПа 🤬9%
  5. У меня вообще нет никакой системы продаж 🥶26%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Продажи в переписке. Говорухин
@money_from_text · 11,673
#1
Виталий Голицын
@VitalyGolitzyn · 26,604
#2
🥜БЕЛОЧКИНА ПРО ПРОДАЖИ🥜
@belochkinanastassia · 16,620
#3
Александр Кандеев
@factor_prodazh_channel · 4,110
#4
КРИНЖ В ПРОДАЖАХ 🌶
@oshibkivprodazhah · 2,569
#5
Альберт Тютин | Хакинг продаж
@sales_hacking_1 · 5,493
#6
ИИ + Отделы Продаж | Ильнур Сагдатуллин
@scriptsales · 1,687
#7
Я — предприниматель
@dashkievpro · 21,205
#8
ATERRA Consulting. Консалтинг ИТ-компаний
@aterracons · 5,397
#9
ПЕРЕГОВОРНАЯ СРЕДА | Канал
@ryzovperegovory · 9,280
#10
Губкин | Про AI и B2B-продукты
@gubkin_business · 11,964
#11
Академия продаж
@b2bsales_academy · 1,816
#12
Валентин Бирюлин «Дружи и Продавай»
@druziprodavai · 4,975
#13
Кузница продаж / Бизнес и продажи
@kuznicaprodazh · 2,383
#14
Фокус на бизнес
@nechto_hard · 14,092
#15
VP of sales
@vpofsales · 1,749
#16
Трус Юлия про бизнес
@trusprobusiness · 37,678
#17
Продажи, с ЗАБОТОЙ о клиенте ❤️
@Vitaliya_Klimenko · 759
#18
💰 Фурсов о продажах
@dpfursov · 1,163
#19
Иван Ларцев
@ivan_lartsev · 13,841
#20
Битрикс24 для бизнеса
@bitrix24_ru · 29,219
#21
Терешев | Клиенты в недвижимости. Маркетинг для застройщиков и АН
@estate_money · 14,254
#22
1000 кейсов «Фактора продаж»
@factor_cases · 943
#23
Продажи с ИИ и amoCRM | Команда F5
@f5crm · 5,960
#24
Света Афанасьева
@engageforsales · 28,914
#25
Курбангалиев честно
@chestnome · 5,034
#26
Инструменты маркетолога
@profit_maker · 45,831
#27
Катерина Уколова💰
@UkolovaEkaterina · 8,489
#28
Александр Львов
@boringmarketer · 7,466
#29
Молянов
@molyanov_blog · 30,289
#30
Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 257,396
#31
Евгений Колотилов, 1000 инсайтов по продажам
@kolotiloff1 · 8,376
#32
Владимир Якуба
@vyakuba · 48,913
#33
Oleg Torbosov
@TorbosovLife · 107,412
#34
Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи
@ryzov_igor · 46,941
#35
Заметки продавца B2B
@Salesnotes · 16,635
#36
Продажник +1
@floor_99 · 7,362
#37
Сергей Бойлерная
@kostenkovru · 7,880
#38
Михаил Дашкиев
@mikhaildashkiev · 43,937
#39
Корытин выкручивает конверсии
@nmiacm · 60,309
#40
Sokolovskiy
@sokolay · 109,366
#41
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 47,331
#42
Путь эксперта. Свобода и деньги
@wayexpert · 1,078
#43
Анастасия Солнцева / Охотники за продажами
@avsoln · 5,311
#44
Арсен Маркарян Официальный
@arsenmarkarian · 157,652
#45
План продаж — Михаил Графский
@s_a_l_e_s · 3,769
#46
Маргулан Сейсембай
@MargulanSeissembai · 209,546
#47
Вдумчиво о продажах
@nikolaevsales · 5,423
#48
Как продать слона. Ася Барышева
@abarysheva777 · 2,870
#49
Оскар Хартманн
@Oskar_Hartmann · 94,059
#50
Игорь Манн
@mann_igor · 29,382
#51
Высшая Лига Продаж | Василий Рыжако
@masterskaya_prodazh · 1,938
#52
Радислав Гандапас
@radislavgandapascom · 53,031
#53
Аяз
@AyazShabutdinov · 179,549
#54
Максим Батырев
@Maxim_Batyrev · 20,663
#55
Нечто | Сообщество предпринимателей
@nechto_community · 23,360
#56
Сила продажів
@sila_p · 2,239
#57
Пинчер: двигатель для отделов продаж
@egorlivadin · 2,514
#58
SeniorPomidor
@saleseniorpomidor · 6,738
#59
Герман Гаврилов
@german_gavrilov · 18,745
#60
Mikhail Tokovinin
@mtokovinin · 108,209
#61
Артем Сенаторов печатает...
@senatorov_art · 31,240
#62
Виталий Крылов - Команда А
@howtomake10x · 17,299
#63
Седа Каспарова
@Seda_Kasparova_news · 257,898
#64
Максим Левченко
@levchenko_realty · 25,062
#65
Александр Высоцкий
@alexander_visotsky · 36,850
#66
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 79,668
#67
Дмитрий Норка | Доверие | Лидерство | Продажи
@dnorca · 6,169
#68
Телеграф Сургая | Вайб-маркетинг
@surgaygraf · 10,477
#69
Нескучные Финансы
@noboring_finance · 65,628
#70
Максим Спиридонов
@mspiridonov · 67,058
#71
Дмитрий Шамко
@shamko_pro · 1,173
#72
А что, так можно было? Максина Юля
@achtotakmozhno · 3,550
#73
ШАРГОРОДСКИЙ | ПРО БИЗНЕС
@DOROGO_GO · 4,640
#74
Руслан Гамзатов | AI маркетинг
@AIGamzatov · 30,202
#75
Гений переговоров | Ольга Грищенко
@kotperegovor · 43,649
#76
Битрикс24 печатает…
@bitrix24clients · 23,010
#77
Максим Агишев || Авито Маркетинг
@Agishev_Maksim · 5,879
#78
Строительство и бизнес
@RussiaBuild · 109,868
#79
Ольга Паратнова. Руководитель Разумный
@trenerolgaparatnova · 10,492
#80
Давид Саркисян
@DavidSSarkisyan · 631
#81
Оперштаб Игорь Рыбаков
@rybakovigor · 150,474
#82
Белоножко Александр | Главный по CEO
@BelonozhkoAleksandr · 2,991
#83
Канал Ильи Балахнина
@ilyabalahnin · 13,647
#84
Елена Коварская: продажи из соц. сетей
@marketingprodazhi · 1,936
#85
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии
@petrosipovprivate · 48,972
#86
Кутергин в огне 🔥
@kutergin_on_fire · 62,116
#87
100%Шпирт
@Shpirt100 · 5,288
#88
Александр Фридман & Регулярный менеджмент
@asfridman · 7,962
#89
ROYAL BEACH SOCHI
@RoyalBeach_Evrostroy · 2,971
#90
Dzari
@DrDzari · 266,726
#91
Румянцев Рулит
@drumyanzev · 22,306
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Виталий Голицын
@VitalyGolitzyn · 26,604
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Владимир Якуба
@vyakuba · 48,913
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи
@ryzov_igor · 46,941
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Трус Юлия про бизнес
@trusprobusiness · 37,678
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Король Говорит! Ораторское
@korolgovorit_school · 23,933
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
Максим Батырев
@Maxim_Batyrev · 20,663
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
Радислав Гандапас
@radislavgandapascom · 53,031
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Александр Высоцкий
@alexander_visotsky · 36,850
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Игорь Манн
@mann_igor · 29,382
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 257,396
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Шевелев” (@olegcloser), 35,032 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olegcloser.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.