Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 98 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,641–20,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 11:18
20,702
-6
9 Nov 2026, 13:44
20,708
-2
8 Nov 2026, 08:50
20,710
+3
5 Nov 2026, 23:46
20,707
-4
4 Nov 2026, 23:11
20,711
+6
3 Nov 2026, 23:08
20,705
+2
2 Nov 2026, 21:46
20,703
-2
1 Nov 2026, 21:57
20,705
-3
31 Oct 2026, 22:58
20,708
+15
30 Oct 2026, 20:07
20,693
+3
29 Oct 2026, 22:07
20,690
-2
28 Oct 2026, 20:38
20,692
+1
27 Oct 2026, 16:25
20,691
+1
26 Oct 2026, 15:17
20,690
-14
25 Oct 2026, 14:29
20,704
+4
24 Oct 2026, 15:59
20,700
-5
23 Oct 2026, 18:38
20,705
+3
22 Oct 2026, 17:39
20,702
-1
21 Oct 2026, 14:09
20,703
-7
20 Oct 2026, 13:30
20,710
first reading
Engagement
83 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.12%
avg views ÷ 20,702 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,890
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 83 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
83 (17 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
39,650
Reactions total
583
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,170
Videos
≈670
Links
≈1,320
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 55m
Average length
4m 17s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,036 reactions across 73 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
843
41.4%
🔥
484
23.8%
👍
339
16.7%
👏
108
5.30%
💯
77
3.78%
❤🔥
65
3.19%
😁
50
2.46%
🥰
23
1.13%
🤯
9
0.442%
🌚
6
0.295%
⚡
5
0.246%
👌
5
0.246%
😢
5
0.246%
🤔
4
0.196%
😍
3
0.147%
🙏
3
0.147%
🏆
2
0.098%
🌭
1
0.049%
🍌
1
0.049%
💋
1
0.049%
2 further kinds
2
0.098%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,077 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 79 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Maxim_Batyrev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.41%
2 of 83 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,530
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,010
over 77 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwncsDY
1
8 November 2026
8 November 2026
2VtzqxQ5vgj
1
30 August 2026
30 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Кто со мной в Африку?
После каждой поездки в Африку мой список «хочу увидеть» становится только длиннее. Во многих странах уже побывал, теперь на очереди — Уганда и Руанда.
📍 С 21 по 28 февраля 2027 года едем в Уганду и Руанду с Комбат-турами.
Главная встреча маршрута — с горными гориллами в лесу Бвинди. Пойдём с рейнджерами через джунгли, чтобы провести время рядом с семьёй этих животных.
А ещё по маршруту:
🦁 Вст…
Как развиваться женщине после родов
💎Полное интервью с моей супругой @TataBatyreva смотрите по ссылкам:
Ютуб👉https://youtu.be/fbqDntlfbvY?is=ZRrNq1UZg3-d_PjF
ВКонтакте 👉https://vkvideo.ru/video-154787068_456240128
Сильная команда не появляется сама по себе. И хорошими руководителями не рождаются.
Можно годами управлять людьми, наступать на одни и те же грабли, терять сильных сотрудников, искать новых руководителей и каждый раз надеяться, что следующий кандидат окажется лучше предыдущего.
А можно перестать действовать методом проб и ошибок и начать выстраивать систему, в которой люди работают результативно, руководители умеют …
Почему во многих компаниях рост продаж не превращается в рост управляемости отделами
Полный подкаст с Иваном Поляниновым @Ivanpolyaninov и Андреем Федоровым @latiesto, которые являются моими партнёрами и экспертами по аудиту и настройке отделов продаж, смотрите по ссылкам!
💎 Смотреть полный выпуск:
Ютуб 👉 https://youtu.be/0NxrnExITEk?is=uyqNV8rVlpVS-zSO
ВКонтакте 👉 https://vkvideo.ru/video-154787068_456240342
Дз…
Современный человек живёт в режиме высокой нагрузки: стресс, дефицит сна, усталость, снижение энергии и восстановительных ресурсов.
Сегодня важно не просто «лечиться, когда стало плохо», а заранее выстраивать систему здоровья, энергии и профилактики возрастных изменений.
Представляю вашему вниманию не просто интервью, а по‑настоящему живой, интерактивный формат, где я прошел путь гостя клиники Enhel Dome и на себе п…
#СтатьяНедели
Нашёл короткую и очень полезную статью в Knowledge at Wharton про то, как правильно извиняться.
Авторы разбирают шесть элементов хорошего извинения именно для руководителей и собственников.
Очень понравился пример Lexus.
Через несколько месяцев после запуска бренду пришлось отзывать первую модель из-за технической проблемы. Компания не стала ограничиваться письмом с извинениями.
Каждому владельцу п…
Малкольм Гладуэлл блестяще раскрыл в книге «Гении и аутсайдеры» вопрос о том, что сильнее влияет на человека: мотивация или среда.
Он доказал: не бывает «селф-мейд» гениев в вакууме. За каждым выдающимся успехом — от «Битлз» до Билла Гейтса — стоят не только талант и 10 000 часов интенсивной работы с запросом на профессиональное развитие, но и правильная среда, контекст и окружение, которые буквально вытолкнули их н…
Сильная команда не появляется сама собой. Её нужно создавать каждый день.
Можно собрать в одном офисе десятки талантливых специалистов, поставить амбициозные цели, разработать стратегию и расписать KPI. Но если люди не чувствуют себя частью одной команды, больших результатов добиться будет сложно.
Я всегда говорил: главная сила любого бизнеса – это люди. Их энергия, вовлечённость, отношение к делу и готовность идти…
О влиянии коммерческого директора на продукты компании
Полный подкаст с Иваном Поляниновым @Ivanpolyaninov и Андреем Федоровым @latiesto, которые являются моими партнёрами и экспертами по аудиту и настройке отделов продаж, смотрите по ссылкам!
💎 Смотреть полный выпуск:
Ютуб 👉 https://youtu.be/0NxrnExITEk?is=uyqNV8rVlpVS-zSO
ВКонтакте 👉 https://vkvideo.ru/video-154787068_456240342
Дзен 👉 https://dzen.ru/video/wat…
Как сделать бизнес независимым от рынка труда и перестать переплачивать за «котов в мешке»?
Кадровый голод - один из главных вызовов для руководителей сегодня. Хватит тушить пожары при каждом увольнении ключевого сотрудника. Пора переходить от хаотичного найма к предсказуемой системе, где сильные кадры непрерывно растут внутри вашей компании.
Приглашаем на премьерный двухдневный мастер-класс Максима Батырева «РОСТ …
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @Maxim_Batyrev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Maxim_Batyrev edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 September 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Рост выручки есть, потому что подняли цены, в клиентах роста нет11%
Начали буксовать. Замедляемся30%
Расходы начали превышать доходы. Пытаюсь спасти16%
Летим вниз17%
Закрыл бизнес3%
Другое. Напишу в комментариях14%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Игорь Манн @mann_igor · 27,429 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
Владимир Якуба @vyakuba · 49,073 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи @ryzov_igor · 46,714 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Радислав Гандапас @radislavgandapascom · 52,696 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Александр Высоцкий @alexander_visotsky · 36,730 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Сила Книги | Аудиокниги | Flibusta @silaknigi · 121,965 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Виталий Голицын @VitalyGolitzyn · 26,732 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Олег Шевелев @olegcloser · 35,486 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Гений переговоров | Ольга Грищенко @kotperegovor · 42,758 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Алекс Яновский @AlexYanovsky · 20,373 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Максим Батырев” (@Maxim_Batyrev), 20,702 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Maxim_Batyrev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.