Проверка фактов в книге — тоже часть маркетинга Часто авторы увлекаются идеей и упускают детали: цифры, имена, даты. Если читатель находит ошибку, это подрывает доверие ко всему проекту. В статье разобрали, как системно проверить утверждения, цитаты и кейсы, вести реестр источников и зафиксировать всё перед печатью. Смотрите пошаговый чек-лист.

Channel
99 франков. Маркетинг
@marketolog_marketing
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
82,438subscribers
-369 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001274607658 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marketolog_marketing |
| Description | Мекка для маркетологов 🚀 👉 Купить рекламу https://reklama.expert-book.pro/telegram Менеджер @JaMasha 📖 Реклама внутри книги https://expert-book.pro/pp 🥇 Хотите книгу, которая усиливает ваш бренд и доверие клиентов? https://expert-book.pro/ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marketolog_marketing |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 82,438 | -35 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:54 | 82,473 | +49 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 82,424 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 82,437 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 82,443 | +20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 82,423 | -326 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 82,749 | +250 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 82,499 | -58 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 82,557 | +41 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:34 | 82,516 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 82,526 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 82,540 | -31 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 82,571 | +11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 82,560 | -56 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 82,616 | +76 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 82,540 | -17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 82,557 | +47 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 82,510 | +21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 82,489 | -60 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 82,549 | first reading |
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.24%
- avg views ÷ 82,438 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,850
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (28 May 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 18,505 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 00:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈424
- Videos
- ≈6
- Links
- ≈1,530
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.86%
- 1 of 35 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 1,970
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 2,730
- over 34 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Пожиратели маркетинговых бюджетов Коллеги, вам не кажется, что скоро мы все останемся без работы? Нейросети уже вовсю проектируют лекарства, причем находят им применение, о котором изначально даже не думали. Это вам не таргет по полу и возрасту настроить. Такой кейс — мечта любого маркетолога. Представьте: вы продаете одно, а клиент получает неожиданный, но куда более ценный бонус. Это высший пилотаж, когда продукт…
Гантели приехали. Новый человек — нет. Вместе с гантелями человек заказывает себе другое утро. Такое, где он бодро встаёт, занимается, нормально завтракает и не ищет чистую футболку по запаху. Гантели приезжают. Утро остаётся прежним. Через неделю в приложении появляется причина возврата: «Не подошли». Очень удобная формулировка. В неё помещается гораздо больше двух железных предметов. В моей книге Матвей работает …
Генеративная графика теперь встроена прямо в Google Workspace Искусственный интеллект продолжает менять привычные инструменты. Google запускает доступ к своему генератору изображений Pics для обладателей подписок на ИИ-сервисы. Это значит, что создавать и редактировать картинки можно будет прямо в знакомых «Презентациях» или «Документах». Удобство для маркетологов и дизайнеров вырастает в разы. Больше не нужно пере…
На что подписывается эксперт в договоре на книгу Вы уверены, что контролируете все права на книгу, которую вам помогают написать? В бюро разобрали ключевые пункты договора на книгу на заказ — авторство, лицензия или полное отчуждение прав, а также этапы работы и нюансы с приёмкой. Это поможет понять, как защитить интеллектуальную собственность, которая станет частью вашего личного бренда. Проверьте договор с юристом…
Бренды снова хотят всё контролировать Wildberries тихо запустил собственный мессенджер WB Chat. Никаких официальных анонсов — просто появился и всё. Теперь они могут общаться с покупателями напрямую, без посредников вроде Telegram или WhatsApp. Это логичный шаг для экосистемы. Компания собирает все данные о диалогах, предпочтениях и даже расшифровывает голосовые сообщения. Покупатель получает удобный канал связи, а…
Сначала один читатель. Потом уже бессмертие Если книгу нельзя описать через одного читателя и одну его проблему, писать главы рано. Материал помогает сначала собрать обещание и маршрут, а уже потом открывать папку со всеми заметками. Посмотрите каркас экспертной книги.
Боты не пройдут Ещё одно приложение для коротких видео запустилось, но с важным отличием. Его создатели запретили контент, сгенерированный искусственным интеллектом. Идея в том, чтобы вернуть живое человеческое творчество, а не работу на бездушный алгоритм. Платформа перенесла миллионы архивов из легендарного Vine и сделала ставку на подлинность. Интересно, сможет ли такой подход стать трендом в мире, где маркетинг…
Ход конем в политическом пиаре Посмотрите, как ловко разыграли эту ситуацию. Бывший морпех освобожден, и каждая сторона подает это под своим соусом. Идеальный пример того, как один жест можно преподнести как чистую гуманитарную миссию, от которой все только выигрывают. В этом и есть суть умелого позиционирования. Неважно, что происходит за кулисами, — важно, какую историю ты рассказываешь миру. Здесь создали наррат…
Что, если твоя жизнь не сломалась — а просто стала слишком терпимой? Это не роман про героя, который потерял всё. Артём ничего эффектно не теряет. Он просто слишком долго соглашается: на нелюбимую работу, на удобную пустоту, на фразу «всё нормально», которую взрослые люди произносят чаще всего именно тогда, когда всё давно не нормально. Одна ночная поездка приводит его на заправку, где топливо получают не за деньги…
Скандал с Ананьевыми: как Альфа-Банк возвращает $140 млн Вот вам классика финансовых разборок: Альфа-Банк не сдается в попытке вернуть огромную сумму. Дело дошло до суда в Восточно-Карибских островах, где банк оспаривает решение первой инстанции. Судьи сначала решили, что структура Kipford Ventures не причастна к хищению средств. Но Альфа-Банк подал апелляцию и убедил суд продолжить разбирательство. Юристы банка на…
Пятнадцать лет практики против одного читателя Читатель покупает не архив автора. Он покупает шанс решить свою задачу без ещё пятнадцати лет проб и ошибок. Разобрали, как построить такую книгу и не утонуть в собственных материалах. Откройте разбор — он экономит несколько месяцев черновиков.
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @marketolog_marketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@BigBrains · 63,781#1
@worklis · 68,410#2
@iAmbitious · 126,262#3
@skillget · 80,986#4
@DELO_govorim · 68,513#5
@iznytri · 80,259#6
@profi_kursi_gaidi · 94,372#7
@startup_club24 · 76,617#8
@work_finde · 87,466#9
@marketolog_digital · 49,078#10
@Prodavec_peregovory · 37,722#11
@profit_maker · 45,831#12
@ikniga · 839,135#13
@dnative · 81,416#14
@MarketingPloy · 69,863#15
@GuerrillaMarketing · 104,686#16
@podkasti_audioknigi · 84,641#17
@Psihologiya_samorazvitie · 50,273#18
@Razvitie_sila_voli · 20,382#19
@kapital_amerika · 30,839#20
@Karernii_serfer_karera · 32,868#21
@Godketing · 112,976#22
@YANtech · 50,523#23
@Cena_uspeha · 57,540#24
@marketingold · 124,179#25
@marketpsy · 174,202#26
@ikyklovod · 70,004#27
@defolt_finansist · 49,440#28
@zapwork · 127,256#29
@communication_department · 41,197#30
@frilans_rabota_vakansii · 36,165#31
@Knizhnaya_polka_marketologa · 35,319#32
@Kultura_obuchenie · 51,165#33
@Joga_dlya_nachinayushchih · 17,771#34
@blogsmm · 38,252#35
@effective_official · 44,118#36
@smartcopywriting · 11,538#37
@motionchek · 42,988#38
@nullastrategy · 2,453#39
@annmuxina_tg · 215#40
@Energiya_molodost · 51,154#41
@steps2b · 1,547#42
@marketingforever · 10,271#43
@svoeizmerenie · 601#44
@petrochenkow · 47,331#45
@yumaks · 42,740#46
@brief_media · 2,287#47
@data_hunt · 1,680#48
@target_nata · 22,055#49
@roistat_com · 14,229#50
@grigor · 15,775#51
@m_cult_members · 2,414#52
@mrktngblog · 10,755#53
@kineticaagency · 7,441#54
@marketing_s · 5,862#55
@marketklad · 9,906#56
@yndx_ed · 56,438#57
@umarketer · 2,836#58
@planerochnaya · 2,183#59
@mann_igor · 29,382#60
@worldppc · 12,355#61
@remingtonist · 27,235#62
@delaumoney · 53,221#63
@marketingj · 22,513#64
@smmrus · 125,271#65
@anvergun · 453#66
@prognosticum · 566#67
@ariadnauk · 1,742#68
@laforzza · 686#69
@napinfo · 1,187#70
@nacopywritila · 1,346#71
@marketingclub_event · 6,031#72
@jobkawork · 10,254#73
@marketingmemes · 2,553#74
@Pisatel_rasskazy · 89,238#75
@marketingfuture · 17,747#76
@velenaQSR · 3,335#77
@AdPoster · 21,243#78
@made_by_noskov · 960#79
@marketingheresy · 1,009#80
@popovamilaa_edu · 842#81
@m_dubchack · 1,020#82
@eLama_russia · 16,467#83
@sizyakov_do · 1,429#84
@smm_eng · 22,392#85
@asciraa · 1,214 (as read 18 August 2026)#86
@tochka_Gmail · 2,535#87
@CityBusinessSchool · 3,110#88
@chooseajob · 14,879#89
@bestadchannel · 6,065#90
@neginskiy_does · 16,886#91
@coffeejob · 1,802#92
@edfix_mobilografiya · 467#93
@the_visual · 2,012#94
@admzrmmr · 210#95
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Prodavec_peregovory · 37,722
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
@Cena_uspeha · 57,540
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 23 August 2026
@startup_club24 · 76,617
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
@podkasti_audioknigi · 84,641
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
@Karernii_serfer_karera · 32,868
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@marketolog_digital · 49,078
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
@worklis · 68,410
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 August 2026
@ikniga · 839,135
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@ikyklovod · 70,004
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@skillget · 80,986
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
@work_finde · 87,466
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
@kapital_amerika · 30,839
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
@defolt_finansist · 49,440
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@iznytri · 80,259
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@profi_kursi_gaidi · 94,372
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@iAmbitious · 126,262
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@Psihologiya_samorazvitie · 50,273
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
@BigBrains · 63,781
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@DELO_govorim · 68,513
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
@communication_department · 41,197
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
@motionchek · 42,988
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
@frilans_rabota_vakansii · 36,165
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
@Energiya_molodost · 51,154
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
@Pisatel_rasskazy · 89,238
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“99 франков. Маркетинг” (@marketolog_marketing), 82,438 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marketolog_marketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.