Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mlm onchain

@mlmonchain

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27,832subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002677926273
TypeChannel
Username@mlmonchain
DescriptionAll content shared is for informational purposes only, not financial or legal advice. Always verify independently and do your own research before making decisions. Donation link: https://t.me/mlmonchain/250
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mlmonchain

Growth

27,83227,87927,855.56 August 2026 — 27,879 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,879 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,875 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,870 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,859 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,853 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,847 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,843 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,832 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,825–27,886 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:1727,832-11
11 Aug 2026, 10:5327,843-4
10 Aug 2026, 12:4327,847-6
9 Aug 2026, 15:1227,853-6
8 Aug 2026, 11:3827,859-11
7 Aug 2026, 11:2027,870-5
6 Aug 2026, 10:4027,875-4
6 Aug 2026, 02:0127,879no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:4827,879first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.7%
avg views ÷ 27,832 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,100
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.666%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total325,000
Reactions total2,165
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
339
Links
1,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,743 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
71025.9%
🔥57521.0%
😭51618.8%
🤣45516.6%
🤯30010.9%
👍1876.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,743reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mlmonchain. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈10,100 views152 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

The TradeXYZ fee recipient wallet transferred 250K USDC from its perps fee wallet (where perp fees accrue) to spot two days ago and used it to buy 2K HYPE (~$110K), which was then used to purchase HIP-3 tickers. https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x9cd0a696c7cbb9d44de99268194cb08e5684e5fe https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x7d16f116d252db609c56d27d6c9605eb03e16657 They have now transferred another $3.25M to spot and starte

👍122🤯30

3 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈14,100 views140 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026

Loracle closed a 503K HYPE long ($26.5M), sold 800K HYPE ($52.7M), and opened a 595K HYPE short ($31.4M) over the past six days. During the same period, he also closed roughly $95M in long positions across various assets, including ETH ($25M), ZEC ($23M), SOL ($14M), and several other altcoins. He has since opened a $23M+ long on gold, which he continues to add to, while also opening a $28M+ ETH short and an $8M+ S

🤯93😭47

2 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈15,100 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/cobie/status/2083857690984345995

66🤣34

29 Jul 2026, 00:34 UTC≈19,000 views144 reactionsread 12 August 2026

TradeXYZ will provide a one-time reimbursement to eligible users for liquidation losses caused by the SK Hynix event, with eligibility details coming soon and payouts expected within days. It emphasized that this is a discretionary decision and does not set a precedent for future incidents. https://x.com/tradexyz/status/2082260930751082821

104🤣40

27 Jul 2026, 08:08 UTC≈17,400 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/rajivpoc/status/2081579138633117865

50🔥24

24 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC≈23,200 views184 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

One of the largest HYPE holders, who accumulated 2.94M HYPE ($172M) in September/October last year, has staked 2.785M HYPE ($164M) over the past 11 hours across 20 wallets. I'd guess it's a16z, but that hasn't been confirmed. 0x1592f68a5f481f2456f5811f8102bad4f3b8d3fd 0x17ff61be5782773dcf21b330c49bb4a942f5cde6 0x5757409b9c6946aedb175b3c89a4be512a0f8a56 0x68d756cdc20175714853c6a6a778287eb96680ee 0x8db36747240ad69c1c

🔥13648

23 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC≈16,100 views196 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Paradigm just unstaked 2.92M HYPE ($171M). https://hypurrscan.io/address/0xcef1c075dbfe6b2d774c74a8b94e8350e9b42c25 https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x90b38c5728f184c87ef46479cf7b402d7b98b98a

🤣135🤯61

23 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC≈50,800 views157 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The hacker who took over Vlad Tenev's X account and launched $VLAD made around 650 ETH (~$1.2–1.3M). 0xEa96883a740CD1d681f97E026f716bA441F1768D 0xdCF9777101d63d970Ea6c360a24488C2Ef83fEB2 0x21a8aF1820400BF63D746618D11da95538eb6884 0xA01ed60B443967Bbdff6bf7511C7E2AE5d3c6268 0xBa45DDE5b29Ef06266F3317d2Fbf71B30B262CFb 0xA5E61836cA5Ee714Dbd0138fFeF775a30d888A73 Wallets currently holding the ETH profits

😭102🤯55

22 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC≈16,100 views169 reactionsread 12 August 2026

“Yesterday we unstaked a large slug of HYPE. We did not unstake to sell.” https://x.com/tushar_jain/status/2079984643584221596

🤣14722

21 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTC≈14,700 views96 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Paradigm consolidated 422K HYPE ($25.4M) into other wallets they control around 20 hours ago and just staked the entire amount. https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x35e7771e1b64f8b5c1c9efa82e2242aecd4153b1 https://hypurrscan.io/address/0xfd7a84563bf1962498ba82baf3a66b2b326ffb32 https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x05ffafc6c0efe96584e7237cf27132fcd9d308ce

🔥75🤯21

21 Jul 2026, 17:23 UTC≈18,000 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Multicoin Capital just unstaked 1.96M HYPE ($120M) across three wallets. https://hypurrscan.io/address/0x57c6d4bd52f592a265f59b595a905b04c848174b https://hypurrscan.io/address/0xab319403e72c5e97c65ef70031bab8827efc5297 https://hypurrscan.io/address/0xd4d56a30a4a745f8ba732e8b453b7066260fbc10

🔥6230

16 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC≈20,800 views129 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

The person who legitimately drained $20M worth of BONK from the BonkDAO treasury 10 days ago has started liquidating the tokens. They transferred 4.4T BONK ($15.3M) to a new wallet, and over the past two hours, 1.19T BONK ($4.11M) has been deposited to Binance. Before moving any tokens to Binance, they had already fully hedged the entire position on Binance perps. FhYPjrH12uLaLXFttCHgEKKFvBPoN6rztMPs2E8LWUNJ

😭9831

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mlmonchain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 20,494 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mlm onchain” (@mlmonchain), 27,832 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlmonchain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.