All content shared is for informational purposes only, not financial or legal advice. Always verify independently and do your own research before making decisions.
Donation link: https://t.me/mlmonchain/250
Created
Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
14,200 average views per post against 28,678 subscribers — an engagement rate of 49.7%. Across the 4,320 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,009–31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.66% and 9.39%, with a median of 4.73%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
35 of 35 published in the window (0 exact, 35 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
498,620
Mature posts only
50.4% over 34 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 52 days, net +799. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,705–28,805 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 16:58
28,678
+337
19 Sept 2026, 15:37
28,341
+147
17 Sept 2026, 06:19
28,194
-6
15 Sept 2026, 04:57
28,200
-5
13 Sept 2026, 17:21
28,205
-16
11 Sept 2026, 23:37
28,221
-6
9 Sept 2026, 11:41
28,227
+44
6 Sept 2026, 01:19
28,183
+38
3 Sept 2026, 22:40
28,145
+77
2 Sept 2026, 11:57
28,068
-8
1 Sept 2026, 11:28
28,076
-4
31 Aug 2026, 08:43
28,080
+1
30 Aug 2026, 06:38
28,079
+6
29 Aug 2026, 04:28
28,073
+3
28 Aug 2026, 01:28
28,070
+35
27 Aug 2026, 00:43
28,035
+63
26 Aug 2026, 03:08
27,972
-6
25 Aug 2026, 03:33
27,978
+4
23 Aug 2026, 23:14
27,974
-2
22 Aug 2026, 03:55
27,976
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.7%
avg views ÷ 28,678 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,200
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.799%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
71 (26 June 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
498,620
Reactions total
3,983
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 18:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈350
Links
≈1,110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
9,190 reactions across 71 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,528
27.5%
🔥
1,886
20.5%
🤣
1,439
15.7%
😭
1,406
15.3%
🤯
1,320
14.4%
👍
572
6.22%
👀
39
0.424%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
110
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 71 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mlmonchain. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The wallet holding the second largest NEAR and largest INJ long position on Hyperliquid just started closing both positions using multiple 6-hour TWAPs.
He is long 5.11M NEAR ($25.3M), with $15.4M in unrealized profit, and 1.48M INJ ($11.7M), with $3.3M in unrealized profit.
He also holds over $30M in combined notional long exposure across INTC and MU, which he is keeping open for now.
The wallet is up $19M over t…
3 hot wallets and 1 cold wallet appear to have been exploited. Not sure what kind of hack this is yet, but the affected wallets still hold about $530M in assets.
If you have money on Bitget (which you shouldn't have had in the first place), withdraw ASAP.
The last transfers out of those wallets were 10 minutes ago.
0xffa8DB7B38579e6A2D14f9B347a9acE4d044cD54
0x1AB4973a48dc892Cd9971ECE8e01DcC7688f8F23
0x97b9D2102A…
Bitget hack currently ongoing, already over $183M worth of assets withdrawn from hotwallets and coldwallets swapped to eth.
0x770b10b273fC44Fe9197D6bF20F145c2e98463Ee
The total value of spot assets deposited on Hyperliquid has surpassed $1B for the first time since October 8, 2025.
BTC leads with 6,770 BTC ($550M), followed by 142K ZEC ($212M), 59K ETH ($156.5M), and 366K SOL ($40.8M).
Of that BTC, 2,082 BTC ($170M, ~31%) is supplied as collateral for portfolio margin.
Wallets holding the deposited assets:
Bitcoin
bc1pdwu79dady576y3fupmm82m3g7p2p9f6hgyeqy0tdg7ztxg7xrayqlkl8j9
…
After closing his entire previous position, Loracle has once again been aggressively shorting CASHCAT, shorting 43.5M CASHCAT ($6.8M) over roughly the past 20 hours.
This represents almost 4.5% of the CASHCAT supply and 12% of its aggregate open interest.
During the same period, CASHCAT dumped more than 20%, and Loracle is currently up over $500K.
https://hypurrscan.io/address/0xefe4c06b6d310978bead596e1798a4fc1d9…
Someone just pumped $DRV to 1,677 KRW ($1.21) on Upbit, up 300% in just 10 minutes.
This pushed $DRV to $0.47 on Coinbase, $0.75 on Gate, and $0.44 on Hyperliquid, up from $0.29 across all three exchanges just 10–15 minutes earlier.
😭62🔥36
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @mlmonchain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@mlmonchain edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mlm onchain” (@mlmonchain), 28,678 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlmonchain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
