Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Секреты DARPA и ЦРУ | DARPA&CIA

Channel

Секреты DARPA и ЦРУ | DARPA&CIA

@darpaandcia

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

16,536subscribers

+563 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001934471554
TypeChannel
Username@darpaandcia
DescriptionРаскрываем секретные проекты DARPA, ЦРУ, IARPA и DNI. Вся информация задокументирована. The Things We Don't Say Out Loud. Uncovering Secret Projects of DARPA, CIA, IARPA, and DNI: All Information Documented
Created4 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/darpaandcia

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.

Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ONCHETVERIKOVA9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 daysthis entry (9–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 84 comparable posts for this entry, running 20 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,97316,54016,256.516,5366 August 202615 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 101 days, net +563. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,888–16,625 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Nov 2026, 07:1516,536-4
11 Nov 2026, 22:5016,540+10
10 Nov 2026, 03:1916,530-1
8 Nov 2026, 15:0616,531+32
7 Nov 2026, 08:4116,499+23
6 Nov 2026, 08:0916,476+10
5 Nov 2026, 08:5116,466+25
3 Nov 2026, 03:5916,441+1
2 Nov 2026, 02:4516,440-3
1 Nov 2026, 01:2916,443+4
30 Oct 2026, 23:4916,439-1
30 Oct 2026, 00:4116,440+5
29 Oct 2026, 00:1716,435-2
26 Oct 2026, 21:3816,437+23
25 Oct 2026, 18:5616,414+52
24 Oct 2026, 17:0816,362+19
23 Oct 2026, 20:0116,343+3
22 Oct 2026, 21:1916,340+3
21 Oct 2026, 16:1616,337-9
20 Oct 2026, 12:3916,346first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.5%
avg views ÷ 16,536 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,030
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.824%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held87 (20 July 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total232,100
Reactions total1,912
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 18:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈904
Videos
≈92
Links
≈1,060

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 14s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,910 reactions across 85 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍92518.8%
🤔75815.4%
🔥67213.7%
💯60012.2%
❤59012.0%
🤬4909.98%
👏1573.20%
😱1442.93%
🤯1392.83%
🤩1062.16%
🤷‍♂881.79%
✍861.75%
😎621.26%
🤝230.468%
👌140.285%
🌚120.244%
🍾90.183%
⚡80.163%
🙏60.122%
🤷‍♀60.122%
6 further kinds150.305%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,066 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 87 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @darpaandcia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 87 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (57.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,270 views37 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

✈️ Китайский электрический самолет CE-25A, разработанный компанией COMAC и способный первозить до 19 пассажиров, совершил свой первый пилотируемый полет, на борту находились два пилота и инженер-испытатель Максимальный взлëтный вес самолета составляет 10 тонн, крейсерская скорость – 300 км/ч, крейсерская высота – 2400 метров, а дальность полета – до 500 км. Самая заметная особенность CE-25A — распределённая электри…

🔥15👍14👏4❤2🌚1🤔1

14 Nov 2026, 04:18 UTC≈3,560 views29 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Вынесем сюда ответ на комментарий к предыдущему посту. Тут дело не в цене листа пенопласта, а в скорости развёртывания и объёме при перевозке. В патенте авторы пишут: на ручную склейку и сборку готового комплекта вроде SYPAQ перед вылетом уходит около 60 минут, тогда как автоматическая упаковочная линия из заявки сама вырубает, склеивает и собирает готовые к запуску дроны со скоростью сотен штук в час. И в одну фуру…

👍14💯7✍6❤1👏1

14 Nov 2026, 00:16 UTC≈6,130 views44 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Одноразовый дрон по цене обувной коробки Недавно была опубликована патентная заявка Технологического института Вирджинии: её авторы, маскируясь под экостартап, предлагают возить посылки до 450 граммов и лекарства (до 250 граммов) на одноразовых самолётиках из обычного гофрокартона. По легенде, получив заказ, клиент просто выбрасывает планер в макулатуру, а блок с мотором и электроникой отправляет назад по предоплаче…

👍20🤔16❤4🔥2🤬2

13 Nov 2026, 09:53 UTC≈2,370 views42 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

✔️Раскрыта личность человека, стоявшего за операцией "Пейджер" Генеральный директор израильской технологической компании Бенни Мейр случайно оказался в центре внимания на конференции "Israel Hayom" в Нью-Йорке, когда было заявлено, что он "сыграл роль" в израильской операции с пейджерами в Ливане. "Вы хотите что-то сказать? Знаете что? Я скажу", - объявил ведущий Йоав Лимор: "[Бенни Мейр] в последние несколько лет…

🤬23✍13👍4🤔2

13 Nov 2026, 05:11 UTC≈2,890 views43 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Вчера появилась информация, что с помощью определённых манипуляций видеокарту для майнинга NVIDIA CMP 170HX с 8 ГБ видеопамяти превратили в карту на 80 ГБ. Выяснилось, что по железу она почти ничем не отличается от профессиональной A100, которая стоит в разы дороже, а ограничена была только программно. Это открывает ряд возможностей для тех, кто хочет запускать ИИ-модели у себя локально. Насчёт локального запуска мо…

👍20❤10🤔6🔥3🤷‍♂3👏1

12 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC≈2,690 views6 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Вооруженные силы Литвы напрямую консультируют Litgrid по вопросам физической защиты критической энергоинфраструктуры. В январе 2025 года командующий ВМС Литвы подписал соглашение с Litgrid о сотрудничестве в сфере безопасности критической подводной инфраструктуры в Балтийском море (включая энергомост NordBalt со Швецией). Сам глава Litgrid описывает это так: «Раньше, проектируя нашу сеть, мы рассчитывали на стихийные…

👍6

12 Nov 2026, 12:54 UTC≈2,860 views25 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Недавно исследовательская команда Кембриджского университета под руководством профессора Ронана Дейли получила финансирование от ARIA — британского агентства, которое часто сравнивают с DARPA, — на проект Protein SPARK. В этом проекте используется подход, который описывают как «капельное Lego»: белки выступают в роли микроскопических шаблонов/«строительных блоков», направляющих рост материалов, включая магниты без ре…

❤12🔥7🤔6

10 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC≈3,590 views59 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Обходной манёвр на орбите: зачем Пентагону спутник, который умеет «нырять» в атмосферу DARPA опубликовало анонс закрытого отраслевого дня по проекту под названием «Анцио». Для военных историков это синоним рискованного обходного манёвра: в 1944 году союзники высадили десант в тылу немецкой «Линии Густава», пытаясь сломать глухой позиционный тупик итальянской кампании. На околоземной орбите Пентагон затевает похожую …

🤔32❤11✍8🔥4👏2🌚1😱1

9 Nov 2026, 05:03 UTC≈3,890 views30 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

In-Q-Tel станет «технологическим разведчиком» Пентагона В начале октября 2026 года Пентагон объявил о формальном партнёрстве с In-Q-Tel и ЦРУ. Пентагон и In-Q-Tel сотрудничали и раньше, но теперь взаимодействие стало официальным. In-Q-Tel, которая прежде работала в основном в интересах ЦРУ, будет проводить технологическую разведку и для Пентагона, а также выступать поставщиком решений для военных платформ. Сотрудн…

🤔22❤3🔥3👍2

9 Nov 2026, 03:43 UTC≈4,050 views57 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Глядя на то, что сейчас происходит в мире, где одна за другой идут кибератаки с использованием ИИ-агентов, начинаешь понимать: мир оказался не готов к этой технологии. Большинство нынешних систем защиты против ИИ выглядят примерно как индеец с луком против современной армии. Когда читаешь, как ИИ-агенты сканируют сайты на уязвимости и находят их почти в каждом, становится ясно, что до катастрофы государственного мас…

💯44❤5🤔4🤷‍♂2🙏2

8 Nov 2026, 19:26 UTC≈3,670 views60 reactionsread 15 November 2026

За последние 10 дней произошёл ряд заметных киберинцидентов. Была взломана криптобиржа Binance. Хакер из Тайваня с помощью ИИ-агентов атаковал сотни организаций в 11 странах, причём, по данным исследователей, действовал он в одиночку. В Бельгии атака на финансовую систему нарушила работу системы начисления НДС. Во Франции в результате сложной кибератаки у банка похитили 133 млн долларов. При этом Великобритания уже …

💯25👏18🤔9🔥4🤷‍♂2❤1👨‍💻1

8 Nov 2026, 18:53 UTC≈3,430 views17 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @MIrvMomentePhoto

🇮🇩 Банковские и государственные учреждения Индонезии подверглись масштабной кибератаке. По данным компании FortiGuard Labs, 7 ноября за 24 часа в стране зафиксировали 350000 киберугроз — в среднем четыре атаки каждую секунду. Основными целями стали финансовые и государственные учреждения. Более 250000 угроз пришлись на финансовый сектор — это 61% от общего числа, больше, чем на все остальные отрасли вместе взятые. О …

🤔12✍2❤1🤬1🤷‍♂1

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @darpaandcia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@darpaandcia edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Ольга Четверикова | Официальный канал
@ONCHETVERIKOVA · 31,384
8 posts
Inside 🅉 Donetsk
@Doninside · 24,100
3 posts
Первый Харьковский
@Kharkov_Perviy · 51,960
3 posts
«Матери Планеты»: статьи, расследования
@matery_planety_statiy · 12,803
3 posts
Медаль Суворова
@medalSVOrov · 62
3 posts
Military hub | СВО, FPV, дроны, БПЛА
@mil_hub · 25,633
3 posts
Drones at War
@Drones_at_War · 330
2 posts
СТРАННИК
@RUSWhiteRabbit · 24
2 posts
VD:Розвідка Ворога
@VictoryDrones · 37,949
2 posts
ВСЕВЕДА🕊
@VseWeda · 13,028
2 posts
Альдиев PRO
@aldiyev · 90
2 posts
FPV-Кузня. Ничего доброго, всего страшного
@content84 · 10,573
2 posts
КиберВойна и мiрZ
@cyber_MipZ · 2,369
2 posts
ГЕНИИ
@generativii · 34
2 posts
Икар ✈
@ikar_i_nebo · 99
2 posts
Марина Масленникова
@mamaslennikova · 30,064
2 posts
🕸Panopticon XXI: Post-democracy⛓‍💥⏳
@panopticon21 · 2,448
2 posts
СЛУЖБА РУБЛЯ
@sluzhba · 627
2 posts
Кибербезопасность Z
@z_cybersec · 250
2 posts
Drones4Front
@Drones4Front · 406
1 post
Галина Царёва (официальный)
@Galina_Tsareva_official · 68,344
1 post
РВС (Родительское Всероссийское Сопротивление)
@RVSsu · 22,194
1 post
VETO on pandemic treaty
@VETO_on_pandemic_treaty · 3,451
1 post
Владимир Орлов
@Vladimir_Orlov1977 · 5,686
1 post
Самохин ньюс
@ZZSamoha1965 · 39
1 post
Боевые Технологии
@battle_technic · 17,149
1 post
Киберпанк, который мы заслужили
@cyberpunkweadeserve · 145
1 post
Опричнина
@desintox · 8
1 post
ИНФЕКЦИИ-ВОЕНМЕД 1.0
@infect_voenmed · 9,550
1 post
ВОИР Карелия
@karelVoir · 18
1 post
Ясность в делах
@manage_me · 251
1 post
Сбой в Матрице
@matrix_failure · 10,502
1 post
MyIDon.SITE
@myidonsite · 83
1 post
Рой Непроханов 🎭
@neprokhanov · 2,620
1 post
Ignition of cognition
@neurobros · 236
1 post
Verum Regnum|Наш Regnum
@regnum_na · 67,804
1 post
Дикое поле
@robot_vs_reptiloid · 38
1 post
Вестник Апокалипсиса
@vestnik2020 · 12
1 post
Боец невидимого фронта
@visvisvisviss · 2,721
1 post
Людей держат за скот
@wmeste3sila · 11,192
1 post
📍Ярославская Дружина
@yardrugina · 394
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 62 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Секреты DARPA и ЦРУ | DARPA&CIA” (@darpaandcia), 16,536 subscribers as measured 15 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darpaandcia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.