Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Синодов пишет

@sinod

On this record: Previous handles · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,868subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001007940599
TypeChannel
Username@sinod
Created23 September 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sinod

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Синодов и Roem.ru — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,8683,8733,870.55 August 2026 — 3,873 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,873 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,871 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,868 subscribers5 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,867–3,874 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:523,868-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:253,871-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:223,873no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:113,873first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

553 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
553100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 553reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sinod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 1 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,370 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На месте властей Самарской области, я бы, кстати, поднял лимиты заправок таксистам, действительно Но только тем кто таксует на "Ладах" https://t.me/thinkaboutism/10825

9

28 Jun 2026, 19:27 UTC≈1,630 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я уже не раз говорил, что вариант существования типа "я сейчас не вместе с Россией, потому что у неё плохие власти, но вообще я за Россию" — невозможен. Если вы, как медийщик, например, прислоняетесь к конкретным врагам России и начинаете брать у них деньги — вы в итоге окажетесь тем самым врагом России. Прямо конкретным и просто по факту своих действий. Нет какой-то торжественной присяги "клянусь работать на благо

31

18 Jun 2026, 06:14 UTC≈3,970 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Обратная связь по блокировкам и белым спискам Мало кто не заметил, что вначале блокировок телеги и продвижения "Макса" я к этому относился достаточно спокойно. Я вполне понимаю нежелание всеохватного присутствия "чужой" медийной платформы, типа Инсты или Телеги в России, и того, что это реально канал по поиску исполнителей всякого нехорошего ВСУшниками. Дальше, однако, начали возникать "спецэффекты", влияющие на к

30

5 Jun 2026, 18:08 UTC≈2,090 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @thinkaboutismPhoto

Уточнения по сборам: 1. Есть ощущения, что у Екатерины (центр "Равновесие") сбор уже состоялся, но поскольку там межбанк и дело, в общем-то хорошее и реальное — не думаю что будет страшно, если будет некий избыток. (в целом не могу не порадоваться, насколько здорово у Екатерины всё получается, и насколько отзывчивы к ней мои читатели, спасибо большое) 2. Вепрей, оказывается, нужно много. Я не знал, что их сейчас не

3

2 Jun 2026, 11:46 UTC≈2,160 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @smi_2Photo

Зачем ФСБ предупредило чиновников об опасности смартфонов? Буквально накануне ПМЭФ Федеральная служба безопасности сообщила о возбуждении уголовного дела за кибершпионаж через смартфоны Канва уголовного дела простая: через смартфоны можно получать несанкционированный доступ к данным пользователя и информации о происходящем вокруг него, подключая в удалённом режиме микрофон или камеру, чем и занимаются многие иностр

15

31 May 2026, 12:26 UTC≈3,990 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Выступал в феврале в Нижнем Новгороде лично, и потом онлайн в мае на проекте "Школа цифрового иммунитета ИИ+Разум". Рассказывал про распознавание фейков, дезинформации и сгенерированного контента. Аудитория, соответственно, была студенческой-молодёжной. То есть, жизненный опыт не очень богатый, новостями аудитория вообще увлекается не очень сильно И что надо тогда рассказывать? Во-первых, пришлось объяснять, что д

26

30 May 2026, 07:16 UTC≈1,670 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас пора походов и грибников, не забудьте рассказать своим детям и родителям, что если они в лесу где-то нашли упавший заблудившийся дрон, который сейчас можно встретить от Карелии до Курщины и Поволжья — подходить к нему не надо, тем более трогать его. 4кг боевой части - это серьёзно: https://t.me/thinkaboutism/10705 Записываете себе координаты, фотографируете, чтоб было проще найти и сообщаете местным полицейск

21

28 May 2026, 10:45 UTC≈1,720 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @smi_2

Почему «Яндекс» продал автомобильную доску объявлений Auto.ru, но хочет купить «Островок»? Анонс возможной сделки о покупке «Яндексом» сайта онлайн-бронирования «Островок» можно объяснить простым бизнес-соображением: компания больше верит во внутренний туризм и бизнес-поездки больше чем в рынок автомобилей. Ездишь ты на авто, поезде или летишь самолётом, где-то тебе остановиться всё равно надо. Но в возможной сделк

17

24 May 2026, 08:48 UTC≈2,100 views30 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @thinkaboutism

Резкий всплеск выездов скорой помощи верующим в Илона Маска с Хабра. С 15-го года я (и не только) говорил, что фонтанирование технологическими идеями и производственными мощностями на территории США не может быть в разы дешевле чем в России. И все верования во всемогущий частный космос — никак не подкрепляются цифрами, это одни пиар-байки. Оказалось, что старая истина, что "опережающее развитие невозможно без опер

30

20 May 2026, 07:33 UTC≈2,000 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @roemruPhoto

Суд оштрафовал за неуважение к суду компанию, предоставившую ИИ-галлюцинации в качестве аргументов в свою пользу Арбитражный суд западно-сибирского округа в своём определении по рядовому спору между двумя компаниями из-за 55 тысяч рублей указал, что одной из сторон процесса, компанией ЦСС, в суд были предоставлены ссылки на дела, которых не существует в реальности Тем самым, по мнению арбитражного суда, общество пы

28

19 May 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,840 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @thinkaboutismPhoto

Мусорный Чехов. Как россиян учат за их деньги тому, что они бьют украинцев В ФБ пришёл один хохол (по его словам - из Херсона), в качестве доказательства своей правоты чего-то там посоветовал посмотреть рукописи Чехова, где он пишет "я вырос в украинском Таганроге" и как коварная русня отовсюду это вымарала. Ну допустим даже пишет, я жил как-то в армянском Сочи, и ничего. Но, к сожалению, рукописей Чехова под диван

34

7 May 2026, 09:18 UTC≈2,160 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @smi_2

Уезжают ли российские разработчики за рубеж, сколько и почему? История с попавшей в СМИ релокацией российских разработчиков, в том числе и разработчиков игр, относительно проста. Во-первых, да, они уезжают, если получают интересные предложения. У нас свободная страна. Во-вторых, мы не можем оценить количественно размер этой истории: люди, которые уезжают за рубеж по работе не оставляют записи в журналах вида «Я ра

19

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sinod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Apr 2026, 08:07 UTCAnonymous Poll78 voters

Около Windrose всплыл ещё Даниил Волков, не чужой Лесте человек. И теперь вариантов чей "узбекский" проект много больше чем было. Итак: чей, как вы думаете, всё же, Windrose?

  1. Волкова26%
  2. Лесты60%
  3. Хатажаева38%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 1 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 656,056 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Синодов пишет” (@sinod), 3,868 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sinod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.