Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Евгений Минченко. Персонально по делу

@enminchenko

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

21,192subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002820067852
TypeChannel
Username@enminchenko
DescriptionЕвгений Минченко, практикующий историк. Мнения в этом канале не представляют официальную позицию Российской ассоциации по связям с общественностью и МГИМО МИД РФ. РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68deca8d4e3c2a74de0c0a4a
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/enminchenko

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

25,800 average views per post against 21,192 subscribers — an engagement rate of 121.8%. Across the 23,171 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.51% and 23.5%, with a median of 11.7%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured10 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 10 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled258,150
Mature posts only121.8% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers21,192 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,171 channels · p10 2.54% · p25 5.51% · p50 11.7% · p75 23.5% · p90 42.3%
Position in cohort99.547th percentile · 10.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.032% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

21,19221,25621,2245 August 2026 — 21,219 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,219 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,248 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,256 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,216 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,199 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,206 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,192 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,182–21,266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:5721,192-14
11 Aug 2026, 22:4121,206+7
10 Aug 2026, 20:0721,199-17
9 Aug 2026, 23:3521,216-40
8 Aug 2026, 04:0221,256+8
7 Aug 2026, 00:3521,248+29
6 Aug 2026, 02:0521,219no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:3021,219first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.0%
avg views ÷ 21,192 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,600
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.452%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held22 (18 June 202613 August 2026)
Views total237,760
Reactions total1,075
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
190
Videos
33
Links
229

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 13s
Average length
4m 37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,750 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,00336.5%
77928.3%
💯2569.31%
🔥2197.96%
😁2107.64%
🤡622.25%
👏471.71%
🤔431.56%
👎281.02%
🤮150.545%
💊140.509%
🥴120.436%
🤣110.4%
❤‍🔥100.364%
🕊100.364%
🥱60.218%
😢50.182%
🫡50.182%
30.109%
🖕30.109%
6 further kinds90.327%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,750reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈2,310 views82 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @politcinemaPhoto

«Одиссея», США, 2026 «Шедевр» Нолана мне практически сразу напомнил советское кино эпохи позднего застоя: - тёмная картинка (наверное, тоже на плёнку Шосткинского объединения «Свема» снимали) - много затянутых крупных планов (в СССР это объясняли тем, что режиссёрам больше платили за более длинных фильмы) - заунывная музыка - она меня сильно раздражала в советских фильмах типа «Русь изначальная». И вот, вернулась

👍58👎8🔥74🤔3🤨1😡1

12 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈3,570 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @politburo2

Сегодня состоялся круглый стол «Обсуждение результатов экспертного исследования ресурсов и стратегий партий на выборах в Госдуму – 2026» (исследование провел Комитет по политтехнологиям Российской ассоциации по связям с общественностью). Текстовая трансляция здесь. Далее - избранные тезисы из выступлений экспертов. ▫️Евгения Стулова, председатель Комитета по политтехнологиям РАСО: Исследование лонгитюдное, проводи

👍185👎1😁1

10 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC≈29,000 views78 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Поговорили с изданием РЕПОРТЁРЫ о том, как принимаются решения, какие скрытые механизмы управляют политической повесткой, о цивилизованном лоббизме в России. Благодарю главного редактора Надану Фридрихсон за острый разговор. Где посмотреть? 📺VK Видео 📺RuTube 📺YouTube Разбили интервью на несколько постов на Минченко.World/ «Минченко консалтинг» RUS/Минченко. Регионы/«Минченко консалтинг» Энергетика Здесь ссылк

🔥3323👍19❤‍🔥2🥴1

10 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTCviews —

Евгений Минченко. Персонально по делу pinned «Хорошее повтори или Как нам улучшить систему выборов 18-20 сентября 2026 года пройдёт очередное многодневное голосование в России. С выборов уже слетают кандидаты: - в связи с тем, что в социальной сети много лет назад упомянули того, кого теперь нельзя…»

9 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC≈37,700 views111 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Хорошее повтори или Как нам улучшить систему выборов 18-20 сентября 2026 года пройдёт очередное многодневное голосование в России. С выборов уже слетают кандидаты: - в связи с тем, что в социальной сети много лет назад упомянули того, кого теперь нельзя называть в связи с тем, что он/она/оно включен после этого в черные списки; - в связи с нехваткой формальных и не влияющих на суть процесса бумажек (типа согласия н

61👍28🔥20🤡2

1 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈10,900 views69 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @mcrepostruVideo

Евгений Минченко: Александр Македонский оказался очень эффективным социальным архитектором, выстраивая взаимоотношения в своей новой империи В «Сенеже» проходит XII Всероссийский молодёжный образовательный форум «Территория смыслов» (президентская платформа «Россия — страна возможностей»/Росмолодёжь). На пленарной сессии смены «Правда» эксперты обсудили тему «Социальная архитектура как способ укрепления фундамента

37👍21🔥8👏2🤓1

27 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC≈13,900 views93 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @mcrepostruVideo

Евгений Минченко: Есть поговорка: «Всё было в Симпсонах». А на самом деле всё было уже в Античности. И социальная архитектура тоже В «Сенеже» традиционно проходит XII Всероссийский молодёжный образовательный форум «Территория смыслов» (президентская платформа «Россия — страна возможностей»/Росмолодёжь). В рамках смены «Правда» - а она идёт прямо сейчас - активисты молодёжных парламентов регионов, молодые депутаты

45👍27🔥15👏4👎2

25 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC≈39,400 views257 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Увидел, что массово расходится моя вырванная из контекста цитата из интервью Даниилу Смирнову на тему перспектив исламизации России. Вот что я на самом деле сказал: ✔️Наследники Чингисхана Странная история с различными вариантами азиатчины. Мы — наследники Чингисхана. Мы не с прогнившим Западом, мы — наследие вековой Орды. Спасибо Чингисхану за то, что вырезал треть тогдашнего населения России, научил нас жить? Ну, н

106🔥55💯40👍28🤮11🤡5👏43

22 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC≈32,500 views284 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Зашёл в свой заброшенный аккаунт в одной не рекомендованной в России социальной сети - прочёл в ленте целый набор сочинений на тему «Тысяча способов объяснить, почему боксёр-грузин весом в центнер может и должен сломать хрупкой русской/украинской девушке нос». Считаю, что это прямое следствие не только политики экстремистской организации Meta, но и национальной политики бывшего СССР. В табели о рангах Советского Сою

👍171💯7329🤔4💊3❤‍🔥2😱2

15 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC≈31,400 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какой год считать годом основания органов безопасности России?

  1. 1654 (Приказ тайных дел)41%
  2. 1686 (Преображенский приказ)4%
  3. 1826 (Третье отделение)23%
  4. 1917 (ВЧК)19%
  5. 1991 (Агентство федеральной безопасности РСФСР)2%
  6. 1992 (Министерство безопасности РФ)3%
  7. 1995 (ФСБ РФ)7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤔21👍5👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @enminchenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@enminchenko edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTCAnonymous Poll2,300 voters approx.

Какой год считать годом основания органов безопасности России?

  1. 1654 (Приказ тайных дел)41%
  2. 1686 (Преображенский приказ)4%
  3. 1826 (Третье отделение)23%
  4. 1917 (ВЧК)19%
  5. 1991 (Агентство федеральной безопасности РСФСР)2%
  6. 1992 (Министерство безопасности РФ)3%
  7. 1995 (ФСБ РФ)7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,890 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

ПолитКино
@politcinema · 1,097
3 posts
Зеленая папка
@greenfolder · 34,721
2 posts
«Минченко консалтинг» RUS
@mcrepostru · 17,009
2 posts
МИПЭ (Международный институт политической экспертизы)
@newkissinger · 136
2 posts
Политбюро 2.0
@politburo2 · 39,982
2 posts
Преданья старины глубокой
@dmakovskiy · 35
1 post
Трезвый политолог
@drunkenpolitolog · 11,092
1 post
Контора глубокого бурения
@kontglybyr · 16
1 post
Минченко. Регионы
@mcrepostregion · 10,133
1 post
Министерство странных дел
@mid_strannyhdel · 1,468
1 post
Образ лидера. Семинары "Минченко консалтинг"
@MinchenkoConsulting · 3,169
1 post
Екатерина Мулина
@mulinaekaterina · 398
1 post
Науруз Байрамкулов | Блог
@nbairamkulov · 176
1 post
Некий Петров
@nekiypetrov · 286
1 post
Politteh - Комитет по политтехнологиям РАСО
@Politteh · 6,559
1 post
Даниил Смирнов
@realdaniilsmirnov · 2,737
1 post
ТолмачёV наZтоящий
@realtolmachev · 1,306
1 post
Русское будущее
@russianfuture · 10,544
1 post
Русский коридоръ
@russo_corridor · 3,527
1 post
SAnt❄️
@santcod · 85
1 post
Vдамки
@shashki_vdamki · 342
1 post
Пелевин GPT
@vnutrypol · 34
1 post
Горячая точка
@voice4mRUSSIA · 17
1 post
Я тут подумал...
@yatutchtopodumal · 13
1 post
Замполит Якутии
@ykt_comment · 1,339
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 88 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

«Минченко консалтинг» RUS
@mcrepostru · 17,009
47 posts
Политбюро 2.0
@politburo2 · 39,982
22 posts
Образ лидера. Семинары "Минченко консалтинг"
@MinchenkoConsulting · 3,169
12 posts
Politteh - Комитет по политтехнологиям РАСО
@Politteh · 6,559
11 posts
ПолитКино
@politcinema · 1,097
8 posts
Восьмой созыв
@rugosduma · 29,533
8 posts
Еловский. Политика и управление
@yellow_sky_policy · 10,156
8 posts
ФРИДРИХ 🎭
@FridrihShow · 67,427
6 posts
ГосСовет 2.0
@GosSovet · 22,024
6 posts
Минченко. Регионы
@mcrepostregion · 10,133
6 posts
Пацаны Трампа
@MinchenkoTrump · 2,797
6 posts
16 негритят
@Gubery · 82,789
5 posts
МИПЭ (Международный институт политической экспертизы)
@newkissinger · 136
5 posts
Зеленая папка
@greenfolder · 34,721
4 posts
Контора глубокого бурения
@kontglybyr · 16
4 posts
Анна Федорова
@lasombrian · 9,927
4 posts
Социальный архитектор
@architectsocial · 2,179
3 posts
Трезвый политолог
@drunkenpolitolog · 11,092
3 posts
Минченко. World
@mcrepostworld · 6,621
3 posts
Международный пиар | РАСО | RPRA
@ra_pr · 149
3 posts
ТолмачёV наZтоящий
@realtolmachev · 1,306
3 posts
Премия Воротникова
@vorotnikovmemory · 773
3 posts
Комитет по социальной архитектуре РАСО
@socarchcom · 163
2 posts
Арифметика победы | Зиновьев Дмитрий
@victorithm · 917
2 posts

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

«Минченко консалтинг» RUS
@mcrepostru · 17,009
7 posts
Российская ассоциация по связям с общественностью (РАСО)
@rasopr · 4,066
4 posts
Минченко. World
@mcrepostworld · 6,621
3 posts
Социальный архитектор
@architectsocial · 2,179
2 posts
Минченко. Регионы
@mcrepostregion · 10,133
2 posts
Минченко. Исторические выписки
@MinchenkoHistory · 2,086
2 posts
Территория смыслов
@terra_scientia · 10,292
2 posts
Фонд Мельниченко
@aimfond_ru · 14,335
1 post
Китай. 80-е и не только
@china80s · 19,441
1 post
Юристы на выборах
@electionallawyers · 1,376
1 post
ФРИДРИХ 🎭
@FridrihShow · 67,427
1 post
Губернатор Клычков
@Klychkov_Andrey · 68,260
1 post
МАСЛОВ
@maslovasia · 18,642
1 post
«Минченко консалтинг» Энергетика
@mcrepostenergy · 726
1 post
МГИМО. Официально
@mgimo_university · 28,783
1 post
Образ лидера. Семинары "Минченко консалтинг"
@MinchenkoConsulting · 3,169
1 post
Политбюро 2.0
@politburo2 · 39,982
1 post
Politteh - Комитет по политтехнологиям РАСО
@Politteh · 6,559
1 post
РЕПОРТЁРЫ
@ReportersLive · 18,414
1 post
Стас уполномочен заявить!
@stasnaumovdeputat · 1,648
1 post
Россия — страна возможностей
@stranavozmojnostey · 53,235
1 post
Владимир Мединский
@vr_medinskiy · 206,383
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Евгений Минченко. Персонально по делу” (@enminchenko), 21,192 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enminchenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.