Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Инфопузырь Жданыча

@zhdani4_bubble

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001857780068
TypeChannel
Username@zhdani4_bubble
DescriptionМасштабная репостильня того, что я читаю и счёл интересным. Очищено от рекламы. Её здесь никогда не будет. Очищено от пропаганды. Политика только в нейтральном исполнении. Если хотите попасть в подборку - киньте ваш интересный пост в личку: @xitroy
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/zhdani4_bubble

Growth

498 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:1549no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:1649first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 49 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total119
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,930
Videos
556
Links
4,710

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 04s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💅133.3%
🔥133.3%
😁133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC5 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @tochno_stPhoto

Девушки проводят в соцсетях больше времени, чем юноши В богатых странах 15-летние подростки в среднем проводят в соцсетях почти 35 часов в неделю. Для сравнения, на школьные уроки они тратят 24 часа, а на домашние задания — 10,5 часов в неделю. Это следует из нового доклада Организации экономического сотрудничества и развития. 🔺Девочки в среднем сидят в соцсетях 37,2 часа в неделю, мальчики — 31,8 часа. На первом м

10 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @kyrillic

Про интеграцию в новое общество, ч.2. В прошлом посте я писал про очень четкий и простой критерий, который почти безошибочно показывает, есть ли интеграция: 1️⃣ Если иммигрант был неоднократно приглашен на свадьбы и похороны местных, то он может считаться интегрированным. (при этом не считается, если жених или невеста - из родной культуры). Мила кстати по этому критерию интегрирована аж в несколько обществ. В отлич

10 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @kyrillic

Что не так с 🇵🇹 Португалией, ч.5. Наша с вами любимая рубрика! К сожалению есть повод снова написать: парламент согласовал изменения закона о гражданстве (pdf). Осталось окончательно утвердить на неделе и подписать президентом, и закон сразу вступит в силу. И никакого переходного периода. 1️⃣ Ну мы и так ожидали, что увеличат срок до 10 лет, причем отсчет будет с даты получения карты внж, а не начала легального прож

10 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @groksVideo

Глава антимонопольного ведомства США Эндрю Фергюсон ещё одну интересную вещь сказал, над которой я глубоко призадумался: Государственные программы, созданные почти 100 лет назад, были разработаны для «той Америки, которой мы были», для «общества, основанного на доверии», где люди соблюдали правила, что, к сожалению, больше не соответствует действительности. Кажется, что это какая-то отмазка перед секвестированием б

9 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC7 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @groksVideo

Схематозы по-американски. Мошенники проводили ненужные операции по трансплантации кожи пожилым американцам в хосписах и домах престарелых, а затем подавали заявки в Минздрав США с требованием возместить расходы на операции. За шесть лет количество таких заявок выросло на 7100% с $200 млн до $14.4 млрд. Напомню, что в США медицина в целом платная. Но есть госпрограммы медицинского страхования Medicare и Medicaid. Пер

9 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @groks

Шикарная история про несовершенность систем, рейтингов и KPI. Пока в городах Подмосковья власти «тупо» занимались благоустройством и ремонтом дорог, чиновники Красногорска пошли по пути настоящих стратегов. Они нанимали людей, которые ездили по Одинцово, Химкам и другим муниципалитетам, фотографировали ямы, разбитые тротуары и прочие коммунальные несовершенства, а потом закидывали этим систему жалоб. Доходило до 2

9 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @pic_squadPhoto

половозрелый военнообязанный патриот России едет в Армению перед сентябрем

😁1

9 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC7 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @vcnewsPhoto

Форум для разработчиков Stack Overflow перевели в режим «только для чтения» на фоне падения трафика из-за ИИ. Число новых вопросов от разработчиков упало на 98,5%: с 109 тысяч в месяц в ноябре 2022 года, до запуска ChatGPT, до 1624 в месяц в 2025-м. Среди других сайтов со снижающейся активностью — Shutterstock, Getty Images и Quora vc.ru/ai/3069701

9 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Депутаты заанонсили КОНТРОЛЬ видеоигр — глава комитета по информполитике Боярский намекнул, что закон о регулировании могут выкатить уже ОСЕНЬЮ. Если документ будет принят: 🕤В игры заставят входить по телефону или через Госуслуги. 🕤Разработчиков обяжут маркировать весь жесткач. 🕤Запрещенную в России информацию потребуют блокировать. За отказ выполнения правил иностранные площадки могут блокировать. 📲 Технотренд

9 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Парсим документы за СЕКУНДЫ и сразу превращаем их в Markdown — нашли опенсорсную тулзу anydoc для подготовки файлов к работе с ИИ. Что умеет: — Конвертирует PDF, Word, PowerPoint и ещё десяток форматов в Markdown. — Обрабатывает документы за считанные миллисекунды. — Сохраняет структуру и качество текста на одном из лучших уровней среди аналогов. — Написана на Rust и полностью открыта — можно использовать бесплатно

9 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @censumPhoto

#ВтораяРабота #Дефицит #Кризис В сети бурно обсуждается график запросов в Гугл относительно второй работы. Хорошо видны пики по нему в кризис 2008 года и ковидную истерию. Последние года три запрос уверенно растёт: причём очень высокими (ранее не наблюдавшимися) темпами. Горе-аналитеги делают вывод о грядущем скором кризисе. Про кризис я напомню байку "великие экономисты предсказали 9 из последних 4х экономических

9 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @censum

#Маректинг #Вебинар #КартаСвязей #Стейкхолдеры #B2B Зачем маркетологу анализ стейкхолдеров Все вы знаете классическую пару покупателей бабушка + внук. Этот тандем славен тем, что бабушка имеет некие установки - и по вкусу, и по целесообразности покупки (даже и особенно - когда она желает нечто приобрести!), а внук - чего-то (что он тащемта неплохо себе представляет, что) очень сильно хочет и вряд ли его обманешь.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zhdani4_bubble. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz6,110 voters approx.

Угадайте, какова медианная стоимость долгосрочной аренды жилья ru-айтишника в Барселоне? [провел опрос в нашем закрытом барселонском чате, завтра будет пост]

  1. 1,300 евро/мес8%
  2. 1,400 евро/мес6%
  3. 1,500 евро/мес20%
  4. 1,600 евро/мес12%
  5. 1,700 евро/мес12%
  6. 1,800 евро/мес15%
  7. 1,900 евро/мес5%
  8. 2,000 евро/мес14%
  9. 2,100 евро/мес2%
  10. 2,200 евро/мес7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 653,832 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инфопузырь Жданыча” (@zhdani4_bubble), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhdani4_bubble.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.