Channel
@eratrends
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
140,362subscribers
+5,318 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001741412401 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eratrends |
| Description | Современность режет только пустого человека. |
| Created | 17 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eratrends |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
129,000 average views per post against 140,362 subscribers — an engagement rate of 91.9%. Across the 2,425 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,015–316,163 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.33% and 21.3%, with a median of 9.90%.
| Window | 30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 24 of 24 published in the window (0 exact, 24 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 3,094,250 |
| Mature posts only | 91.9% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 140,362 measured 17 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000:rus · 2,425 channels · p10 2.00% · p25 4.33% · p50 9.90% · p75 21.3% · p90 36.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.587th percentile · 9.3× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.21% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 140,362 | +6,935 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 133,427 | -3,078 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 136,505 | -1,527 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 138,032 | +1,301 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 136,731 | -174 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 136,905 | -1,051 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 137,956 | +438 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:47 | 137,518 | -75 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:05 | 137,593 | +1,359 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 136,234 | -2,244 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 138,478 | -144 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 138,622 | -99 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 138,721 | +936 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 137,785 | -62 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:59 | 137,847 | +1,911 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 135,936 | -1,086 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 137,022 | -273 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 137,295 | +6,398 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 130,897 | -121 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 131,018 | first reading |
64 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 64 (14 July 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,094,250 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 21:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Игры Большой Двойки. Вашингтон и Пекин пытаются нащупать новые правила сосуществования в условиях обостряющегося соперничества. Официальное начало визита Си Цзиньпина в США стало сигналом к возобновлению переговоров высшего уровня, которые призваны снизить накопленную напряженность. Эксперты отмечают, что на мировой арене должен остаться только один истинный гегемон, вследствие чего обе ведущие сверхдержавы вынужден…
Война без передышки? Дипломатическая среда вокруг продолжающегося конфликта на Украине демонстративно наполнена противоречивыми сигналами, которые отражают глубокий кризис международных институтов. На фоне официальных деклараций о поисках мира кремлевская верхушка воспринимает озвученные Панфиловой итоги подтасованных выборов исключительно как полученный карт-бланш на продолжение военных действий. При этом официаль…
Набат энергетического перемирия. Удары по энергетическим и инфраструктурным объектам превратились в один из ключевых факторов, определяющих экономическую и политическую динамику СВО. Фронт остается практически неподвижным, что порождает эскалацию ударов по невоенным объектам. Нынешняя, уже третья к ряду, атака на важный НПЗ в Самаре демонстрирует нарастающую интенсивность ударов по критической инфраструктуре на росс…
Перипетии фиктивных выборов в России. Текущие электоральные мероприятия в Российской Федерации проходят в условиях беспрецедентного напряжения, потому что голосование прошло под регулярными ударами беспилотников, которые методично атаковали различные регионы страны. Граждане были вынуждены приходить на избирательные участки под звуки сирен воздушной тревоги, пока местные администрации пытались создать иллюзию нормаль…
Война бьет по выборам. События последних месяцев демонстрируют факт того, насколько глубоко вооруженный конфликт проникает в политическую жизнь, причем выборы испытывают особенно сильное влияние. Ощущение безопасности покинуло жителей российских мегаполисов, когда в дни голосования произошли массированные удары сотнями дронов по Москве, которые заставили население пересмотреть взгляды на текущую ситуацию. Неожиданна…
Трамп ударил по РФ «адским законом»Грэма. Неумолимое геополитическое противостояние приобрело совершенно новые очертания после того, как Дональд Трамп подписал резонансный документ об «адских санкциях» против России, тогда как Белый дом официально подтвердил вступление данного акта в силу восемнадцатого сентября. Вашингтон перевел один из самых жестких инструментов экономического принуждения из стадии кулуарных обсуж…
Мобилизация после выборов: топливо для вечной войны. Выборы в Государственную думу проходят без очевидных эксцессов, однако молчание населения оставляет общество беззащитным перед любыми произвольными решениями руководства страны. Именно на этом фоне в информационном пространстве развернулась масштабная кампания, в рамках которой представители власти раз в несколько дней выступают с заверениями об отсутствии планов …
Гибель генералов ничего не меняет в путинской войне? Когда информационное пространство заполняется многочисленными сообщениями о гибели командного состава, у общественности возникает впечатление возможного перелома в конфликте. Многочисленные спекуляции вокруг возможной смерти командующего 51-й общевойсковой армией генерала Мильчакова показывают, насколько сильно аудитория реагирует на громкие имена. Появившаяся пут…
Энергетическое перемирие Шредингера. Обсуждение потенциальной паузы в ударах по критической инфраструктуре превратилось в парадоксальную политическую конструкцию, когда стороны заявляют о готовности к переговорам, но реальные боевые действия на местах продолжаются без каких-либо изменений. Дипломатические ритуалы и инициативы создают лишь иллюзию затишья, пока военное руководство обеих стран сохраняет ориентацию на с…
Питер на бензиновом дефиците. Российский топливный рынок столкнулся с ощутимым давлением, которое выражается не только в устойчивом подорожании горючего, но и в локальном дефиците. Согласно официальным данным Росстата, потребительские цены на бензин в августе подскочили на 24,64% по сравнению с аналогичным периодом прошлого года. Если рассматривать помесячную динамику, то после резких скачков на 6,88% в июне и на 6,…
Закоулки саммита БРИКС-2026. За официозным блеском дипломатических встреч и торжественными фотографиями лидеров государств-членов БРИКС скрывается сложное сплетение скрытых интересов, которые формируют реальный контур современного идущего к хаотической многополярности мира. Мероприятия высшего уровня в Нью-Дели, куда российский лидер направился с обширной программой участия, продемонстрировали глубокую трансформацию…
Сомнительные свершения эры ЕР. Критический разбор народной программы «Есть результат» от «Единой России» помогает понять насколько далека партийная «правда» от жизненных реалий. Партия видит прогресс везде, вплоть до зоны СВО. ЕР в качестве достижений путинизма в «новых регионах» приводит цифру в 500 восстановленных промпредриятий с 60 тыс. сотрудников, которые функционировали здесь к весне 2024 г. Однако данная циф…
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @eratrends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@eratrends edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 65 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тенденции эпохи” (@eratrends), 140,362 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eratrends.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.