Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for artjockey заметки

Channel

artjockey заметки

@artjockey_lite

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,198subscribers

+644 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002054798398
TypeChannel
Username@artjockey_lite
DescriptionВторой канал для неформатных заметок. Основной: https://t.me/artjockey
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/artjockey_lite

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

36,400 average views per post against 40,247 subscribers — an engagement rate of 90.4%. Across the 8,315 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,997 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 20.8%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured80 of 80 published in the window (0 exact, 80 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,910,000
Mature posts only90.8% over 79 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers40,247 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,315 channels · p10 2.60% · p25 5.08% · p50 10.5% · p75 20.8% · p90 35.5%
Position in cohort99.543th percentile · 8.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.072% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

39,55340,84040,196.540,1986 August 20268 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net +644. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,360–41,033 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 17:1740,198-21
7 Nov 2026, 10:3540,219-18
6 Nov 2026, 10:4040,237-10
5 Nov 2026, 10:5940,247-10
4 Nov 2026, 13:4740,257-118
3 Nov 2026, 10:5940,375-12
2 Nov 2026, 13:3640,387-20
1 Nov 2026, 13:0840,407-19
31 Oct 2026, 15:2840,426-14
30 Oct 2026, 14:1540,440-32
29 Oct 2026, 12:2040,472-4
28 Oct 2026, 09:3940,476-25
27 Oct 2026, 08:0940,501-1
26 Oct 2026, 09:5640,502-9
25 Oct 2026, 09:4640,511-37
24 Oct 2026, 11:3040,548-9
23 Oct 2026, 11:3640,557-18
22 Oct 2026, 11:4940,575-52
21 Oct 2026, 05:3140,627-21
20 Oct 2026, 00:0640,648first reading

Engagement

233 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
88.0%
avg views ÷ 40,198 subscribers
Avg views / post
35,400
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 233 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held233 (31 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total2,723,300
Reactions total48,863
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 21:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,090
Videos
≈647
Links
≈210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30m 20s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

153,308 reactions across 230 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔47,51231.0%
😁24,79416.2%
🤣18,05311.8%
🕊15,69310.2%
😢11,2837.36%
👍9,1305.96%
🔥6,4804.23%
😡5,8563.82%
❤5,4773.57%
😱4,7653.11%
💯1,9681.28%
🌚1,4950.975%
🍾5080.331%
🆒1650.108%
⚡1290.084%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 233 of the 233 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154,993 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 233 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
440
across the posts below
Posts paid on
219
of 233 we hold a reading for · 94%
Most on one post
27
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artjockey_lite. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 233 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 16 of 77 posts held from the last 30 days (20.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC≈17,600 views461 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

Я недавно уже писал, что хорошо бы Путину, если он решит атаковать украинские АЭС, показали бы карту расположения российских АЭС. Ну чтобы не вышло как с дата-центрами и складами, то есть чтобы не верещать потом на весь мир: «а нас то за шо?» и не просить Трампа спасти россиюшку от хохлов. Но «Два дебила» куда лезут? Ладно Путин, он о стране думает, а не о таких мелочах, а эти просто отрицательно умны или в чём их п…

🤣216🕊150🔥54❤22😁19

8 Nov 2026, 14:05 UTC≈20,500 views550 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

Прояснилась ситуация с Даной Уайтом и Трампом. Оказывается, речь действительно могла идти про назначение Даны Уайта, только другого, точнее, другой: женщины, которая ранее работала помощником по связям с общественностью министра обороны США времён первого срока Трампа. Похоже, Трампу предложили её как кандидата, а он решил, что речь идёт про его друга — владельца UFC, — и побежал шитпостить в Truth. В целом, не секр…

🤣437😁51🤔44🌚10👍8

8 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC≈20,200 views267 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ещё одна инфографика про успешное применение украинских крылатых ракет. Видно, как государство закупило партию «Нептунов», но потом Штилерман при поддержке Миндича впарил свою поделку государству, и применения «Нептунов» практически прекратились, с 2026 года их, вероятно, почти не закупали, рассчитывая на «Фламинго». Примерно летом 2026 года пришло понимание, что милфтехи не могут обеспечить заявленные изначально х…

🤔194👍28🤣23❤14😡8

7 Nov 2026, 21:19 UTC≈26,500 views860 reactions2 Starsread 8 November 2026

Вчера смеялись над запретом пиццы, но как мне кажется, не все за деревьями видят лес, даже обычно серьёзные журналисты проехались только по пицце. Поэтому повторюсь: запрет пиццы обсуждался не просто так, а в контексте нового наполнения «Дня народного единства». В то же время Госдума готовит закон «о традиционных ценностях», а сегодня силовики проводили акцию запугивания подростков на Китай-городе. Вот показания од…

😢586😁143👍60❤42🔥29

7 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC≈26,500 views553 reactions2 Starsread 8 November 2026

Трампа поплавило. Он уже успел: ▪️Уволить главу Белого дома и взять на её место Стивена Миллера; ▪️Пригласить работать секретарём Дану Уайта вместе с Исламом Махачевым и Хабибом, это не шутка, во всяком случае, Трамп это действительно написал в Truth; ▪️Потребовать от генерального прокурора срочно начать расследования против демократов, которые обещают начать расследования против Трампа и его окружения. Стивен Милле…

😁312🤔139🤣58❤32🌚12

6 Nov 2026, 18:08 UTC≈29,000 views768 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026

Правительство внесло в Госдуму законопроект об автоматической конвертации накопительной пенсии в Программу долгосрочных инвестиций. Если закон примут — пишу так, будто бы могут не принять, — то конвертация произойдёт уже с 1 апреля 2027 года. Всего под конвертацию подпадут около 6,6 триллионов рублей, принадлежащих 70 миллионам граждан, хранящиеся как в СФР, так и в частных пенсионных фондах. Если деньги лежат в НПФ…

😡463🤔186👍50🔥42😱27

6 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC≈28,200 views739 reactions4 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Анатолий Радов оказался жив и не в штурмовиках, сейчас просох и делится жизненными наблюдениями. Вот некоторые удивляются, а как Путин может не знать «всей правды», но это как раз не вызывает удивления. Что ему в папочках принесут — то он и знает. Солдат ему тоже покажут тыловых, парадно-выставочных, которые как та женщина-связист доложат, что в армии всё есть, а жалоб — нет. Гораздо большее удивление должно вызыват…

💯490🤔113🤣62🕊56👍18

5 Nov 2026, 16:23 UTC≈29,600 views673 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

Мероприятие в Белом доме по итогам миссии в Алёшках. Делегатов посадили вместе, причём попарно: Лантратову рядом с Лубинцом (уверен, он доволен), а Дмитриева рядом с Арахамией. Официально это не переговоры, а церемония, организованная Меланией, но очевидно, что это неофициальные переговоры и формирование нового канала связи между довольно умеренными и компромиссными представителями обеих сторон. Что важно, эта встр…

🕊450🤔145❤41🤣22🔥15

5 Nov 2026, 10:54 UTC≈29,100 views565 reactions2 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ночью был атакован НПЗ в Рязани. История повторяется: снова несколько отдельных очагов горения на территории указывают на попытки поразить сразу несколько разных целей. Это уже 5-й атакованный НПЗ за неделю. Интересно то, что эффективность украинских атак не снижается, то есть меры противодействия, начиная от создания МОГ и кончая затягиванием сетками элементов комплекса, может быть, заставляют Украину прикладывать …

😢262🔥130🤔116😡34😁23

4 Nov 2026, 16:21 UTC≈32,200 views530 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

Brent летит вниз. Ещё буквально вчера все ожидали возобновления войны, на что активно намекал и сам Трамп, но затем, признавая поражение, назвал войну с Ираном главной её причиной. То же самое написал и Вэнс, который считался главным её противником в окружении Трампа. Отсюда, наверное, следует вывод, что если американцы не поддерживают войну, то не нужно её возобновлять. Американская пресса параллельно инсайдит, чт…

🔥195😁153🕊140❤21🤣21

4 Nov 2026, 05:42 UTC≈31,900 views515 reactions3 Starsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Хотя голоса ещё считают, но уже понятно, что выборы закончились тотальным разгромом республиканцев. Трамп стал для своей партии БОЛЬШИМ и КРАСИВЫМ якорем, который утащил её на дно. Думаю, можно уже предположить, что следующим президентом США будет демократ, отыграть такое за два года — особенно с Трампом — будет сложно. После обеда в основном канале напишу пост о том, что будет дальше: какая стратегия у Трампа, кака…

🔥222🤔186😁76❤26⚡5

4 Nov 2026, 04:56 UTC≈38,300 views482 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

Это не пародийный аккаунт, если что, это реальный Трамп постит.

🤣354🤔54😁51🕊18⚡5

Showing the 12 most recent of 233 posts we hold for @artjockey_lite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@artjockey_lite edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 October 2026
Most recent edit
23 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @artjockey_lite as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

artjockey
@artjockey · 81,935
#1
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 751,300
#2
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны
@rvvoenkor · 1,452,598
#3
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 865,410
#4
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺
@voenacher · 658,722
#5
Крупнокалиберный Переполох
@bolshiepushki · 322,903
#6
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие
@warhistoryalconafter · 478,412
#7
Олег Царёв
@olegtsarov · 401,560
#8
Говорит ТопаZ 🪖
@Love_Russia_Beauty · 114,696
#9
Ded_Banzay
@Ded_Banzay_official · 34,354
#10
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,837
#11
Mash
@mash · 3,142,084
#12
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,735,813
#13
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 525,601
#14
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,664,351
#15
Димитриев
@russ_orientalist · 129,214
#16
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,779
#17
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 423,330
#18
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,606
#19
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 710,783
#20
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 665,219
#21
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 967,574
#22
МИГ России
@mig41 · 476,980
#23
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 963,750
#24
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,013,503
#25
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 276,046
#26
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 485,137
#27
Два майора
@dva_majors · 1,162,469
#28
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,047,084
#29
Alex Parker Returns
@apwagner · 313,364
#30
Военный Осведомитель
@milinfolive · 614,590
#31
Политика Страны
@stranaua · 334,803
#32
LOSTARMOUR | Carthago delenda est!
@lost_armour · 88,697
#33
іній
@ice_inii · 36,656
#34
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,427
#35
КБ
@cbpub · 667,968
#36
историк-алкоголик
@istrkalkglk · 123,375
#37
Абу
@abuwtf · 275,000
#38
SimpDungeon☠️
@grpzdc · 176,603
#39
Воевода Вещает
@ZOV_Voevoda · 166,514
#40
Win-Win
@victorstepanych · 155,270
#41
АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА
@arx_spn · 1,019,931
#42
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 322,611
#43
Александр Ходаковский
@aleksandr_skif · 313,494
#44
Лентач
@lentachold · 391,614
#45
Х_Т ©
@X_T_official · 2,990
#46
Hard Blog
@Hard_Blog_Line · 82,164
#47
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 914,052
#48
Ватфор | Автострадный think tank
@vatfor · 32,287
#49
КВ
@vizioner_rf · 48
#50
Коты и кошка Крамника
@kramnikcat · 38,923
#51
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 250,554
#52
КБ. экономика
@cb_economics · 365,150
#53
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,781
#54
Лепра
@Lepragram · 340,868
#55
ZАПИСКИ VЕТЕРАНА 🇷🇺
@notes_veterans · 273,909
#56
Грокс
@groks · 42,490
#57
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 469,665
#58
Пролив Сталина
@prolivstalina · 41,244
#59
Образ будущего
@obrazbuduschego2 · 163,926
#60
Бладсикер 2.0
@bIoodsiker · 211,281
#61
Двач
@dvachannel · 969,677
#62
MarketScreen
@marketscreen · 14,275
#63
Банкста
@banksta · 439,730
#64
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,671
#65
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 429,401
#66
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,689,376
#67
AlexRadio News
@alexradionews · 5,650
#68
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,139
#69
Кримсон Дайджест
@crimsondigest · 141,038
#70
Норин
@norinea · 40,683
#71
Rozetked
@rozetked · 648,103
#72
official Деньги любят тишину
@official1wru · 7,414
#73
CatNews
@cat0news · 19,463
#74
Фининди | Александр Елисеев
@Finindie · 73,264
#75
Vault 8. Убежище №8.
@vault8pro · 40,043
#76
BRIEFLY RU
@brieflyru · 99,223
#77
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 340,839
#78
Пикабу
@pikabu · 254,983
#79
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 131,106
#80
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 183,086
#81
Cynic Mansion
@cynicmansion · 10,844
#82
Минцифры России
@mintsifry · 232,505
#83
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 331,125
#84
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,370
#85
Старпонивилль
@starponyville · 7,635
#86
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,553
#87
Закулисье маркетинга
@marketing_back · 66,286
#88

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

artjockey
@artjockey · 81,935
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Ded_Banzay
@Ded_Banzay_official · 34,354
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Закулисье маркетинга
@marketing_back · 66,286
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
BspChannel
@BSPhistorychannel · 23,405
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
Yan_Dilan
@yan_dilan · 77,573
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Печатные выражения
@pechat_sallyks · 26,345
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“artjockey заметки” (@artjockey_lite), 40,198 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artjockey_lite.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.