National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,800–40,418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 07:45
40,347
+304
8 Nov 2026, 19:58
40,043
-8
7 Nov 2026, 10:20
40,051
-12
6 Nov 2026, 09:31
40,063
+3
5 Nov 2026, 12:50
40,060
-6
4 Nov 2026, 10:17
40,066
-16
3 Nov 2026, 13:06
40,082
+6
2 Nov 2026, 11:35
40,076
+1
1 Nov 2026, 14:31
40,075
-6
31 Oct 2026, 16:29
40,081
+5
30 Oct 2026, 19:38
40,076
-4
29 Oct 2026, 19:39
40,080
-8
28 Oct 2026, 20:58
40,088
+2
27 Oct 2026, 21:18
40,086
+4
26 Oct 2026, 22:09
40,082
-8
25 Oct 2026, 20:57
40,090
+10
24 Oct 2026, 20:38
40,080
+15
23 Oct 2026, 22:20
40,065
-1
22 Oct 2026, 22:15
40,066
+22
20 Oct 2026, 15:09
40,044
first reading
Engagement
259 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 40,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,200
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
85
of 259 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
259 (26 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
1,039,390
Reactions total
17,392
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 22:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈23,900
Videos
≈8,540
Links
≈5,180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 34m
Average length
10m 20s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
55,482 reactions across 254 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
11,760
21.2%
💯
7,843
14.1%
❤
7,237
13.0%
😁
7,146
12.9%
🤬
4,736
8.54%
🫡
4,601
8.29%
🔥
3,900
7.03%
✍
1,640
2.96%
🤔
1,516
2.73%
👎
1,411
2.54%
😱
780
1.41%
👀
748
1.35%
👏
561
1.01%
🎄
388
0.699%
🗿
323
0.582%
🎉
230
0.415%
😐
190
0.342%
😈
165
0.297%
☃
157
0.283%
🤨
105
0.189%
1 further kind
45
0.081%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 255 of the 259 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55,482 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 259 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 85 posts held from the last 30 days (1.18%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Противотанковое оружие пехоты, которое изменило всё
Не так давно, сразу после Дня Танкиста, сделал серию постов о том, как ведущая роль танков в сухопутных боях стала сомнительной уже в 1960-х из-за всеобщей моторизации пехоты (потеря преимущества в подвижности у танковых частей по сравнению с пехотными) и массового внедрения противотанкового оружия — дешёвого пехотного (ПТРК + безоткатные орудия + реактивные против…
Сколько стоит «стартовый набор» оператора зенитных дронов?
После текста о «стартовом наборе» коптерщика-разведчика на «Мавиках» пришло письмо про следующий набор дроновода — дроновода-перехватчика.
Я решил накатать список на ПВО БПЛА (в частности, «Молнии ПВО», но там будет меняться разве что цифровое видео, разброс +/- в 50 тысяч не критичен)
1. 2 бензиновых/инверторных бенз. генератора по 42 тысячи рублей — 84 т…
Новая мина поросян замаскированная под ветку (обклеена плёнкой).
Изготовлена из водопроводного шланга, внутри ПВВ и магнитный инициатор. Касание или переворот ветки - подрыв.
Весьма эффективна и опасна. Сложно распознаётся на местности.
Днём и вечером какая-то впечатляющая активность вражеских дронов на нашем фронте. Несколько десятков сбитых FPV, несколько единиц сбитых «Баб Ёг» и «Хорнетов»/их подобий.
Начнем субботу с хороших новостей. Расчет FPV погранцов, которому мы в мае собирали на оборудку, скинул новое видео. На этот раз парни помогли заблудившемуся НРТК ВСУ не доехать до дома.
Напомню, это было сделано с помощью той оборудки на которую вы уважаемые подписчики скидывались. Считаю тот сбор одним из лучших вложений, которое мы делали😁
Да, и со 109-й годовщиной Великой Октябрьской Социалистической Революции!
Напомню, что который год СВО мы воюем в значительной степени советским оружием. Буквально. Автоматами и пулемётами Калашникова 1980-х годов (включая ПКТ на ПВНах), танками и артиллерией из советских запасов... При мобилизации нам раздавали малые пехотные лопатки 1940-1950-х гг. производства, а год спустя, когда полк вывели на пополнение перед …
Друг сделал мне репост в личку из одного тг-канала по поводу окончания первых спецконтрактов в войсках БПС (сроком на 1 год, с возможностью солдатско-сержантскому составу уволиться с военной службы по окончании срока). В посте были сомнения по поводу того, что отпустят и предположения, что обманут.
Спросил знающих людей, занимающихся темой личного состава и контрактами — пока что вся вертикаль зелёного гос.института…
Сколько стоит «стартовый набор» оператора дрона коптерного типа (КТ)?
Обратился за консультацией к админу-добровольцу, чтобы снова посчитать чужие деньги и собрать набор для работы оператора-«мавикиста». Вышло следующее:
На самом деле список небольшой, и я про мелочовку не буду, только про самое основное. Итак, мы оснащаем с нуля расчет, возьмём третьи «Мавики» для простоты:
— «Мавик 3 pro» в комплектации Fly More …
Судя по британским спутниковым снимкам, практику расстановки Су-34 плотным рядом на аэродроме «Борисоглебск» в Воронежской области западные разведывательные спутники могли лицезреть как минимум с середины сентября.
Напомним, в ночь на 15 октября был нанесён удар ракетой «Нептун» в самый центр этого собрания самолётов на вышеупомянутом аэродроме.
Осведомитель
Хочу заметить, что в большинстве случаев успешные удары противника происходят по тем местам, где просчёты в организации безопасности людей и техники не только присутствуют сами по себе, но и длятся продолжительное время (в данном случае — не менее месяца самолёты строили в аккуратную линию) 👇
💯97✍12😁9🤬7❤3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 259 posts we hold for @vault8pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@vault8pro edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 October 2026
Most recent edit
15 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @vault8pro as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
15 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
18 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Филолог в засаде @philologist_zov · 59,058 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Минная дивизия @ASWman · 32,698 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
Unfair Advantage @unfair_advantage_tg · 25,002 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
Тени Руси @tenirusi · 24,867 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Наемник. Иван Даин @naemnik_Z · 22,466 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026
Алексей Исаев. «Железный ветер» @iron_wind · 33,714 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
CatNews @cat0news · 19,454 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 October 2026
Никита Третьяков @tretyakov_n · 26,311 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
КЦПН. Координационный Центр Помощи Новороссии. @kcpn2014 · 35,730 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 September 2026
СВО после @SVO_after · 19,720 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 September 2026
Inna Matisson ИННА МАТИССОН @Inna_Matisson · 34,241 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 September 2026
Filatov movies @FilatovMovies · 29,721 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
artjockey заметки @artjockey_lite · 40,169 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Картавых Александр @AlexCarrier · 145,040 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Лев Вершинин @putnik1lv · 42,133 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
artjockey @artjockey · 81,955 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Димитриев @russ_orientalist · 129,145 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vault 8. Убежище №8.” (@vault8pro), 40,347 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vault8pro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.