Channel
@greyshemes
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,538subscribers
+52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001598799096 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @greyshemes |
| Created | 23 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/greyshemes |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 34 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @kremlebezBashennik/4753625 Oct 2026, 09:42 UTC | @greyshemes/10911 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 07:35 UTC | 1.00 | 22 hours |
| @greyshemes/10917 · this entry28 Oct 2026, 14:24 UTC | @kremlebezBashennik/4757328 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @kremlebezBashennik/4758229 Oct 2026, 08:59 UTC | @greyshemes/10918 · this entry29 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @greyshemes/10910 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 07:34 UTC | @pyatiletka111/793926 Oct 2026, 09:59 UTC | 1.00 | 2.4 hours |
| @greyshemes/10678 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC | @zonaosoboho/400364 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @greyshemes/10677 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC | @zonaosoboho/400404 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @kremlebezBashennik | 19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 11 hours | @kremlebezBashennik (17–2) |
| @pyatiletka111 | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 12 hours | @pyatiletka111 (10–7) |
| @zonaosoboho | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4 days | this entry (14–0) |
| @listnewsru | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 34 hours | this entry (6–2) |
| @moscow_laundry | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 days | this entry (6–1) |
| @donbasscase | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 24 hours | this entry (12–0) |
| @chestno_i_tochka | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 17 hours | @chestno_i_tochka (6–0) |
| @master_pera | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 18 hours | @master_pera (5–0) |
| @kritiknewsfeed | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4.7 hours | even |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 66 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 34 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @redbinder. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 34 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 16:16 | 6,538 | +38 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:10 | 6,500 | +12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:20 | 6,488 | +4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:49 | 6,484 | -11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:39 | 6,495 | +3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 6,492 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 6,488 | +8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 6,480 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:15 | 6,484 | -9 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 6,493 | +1 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 6,492 | +1 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 6,491 | +23 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 6,468 | +5 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:55 | 6,463 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 6,458 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 6,457 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 6,462 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 6,457 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 6,461 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 6,473 | first reading |
66 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (29 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 35,742 |
| Reactions total | 66 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 17:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
105 reactions across 26 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌚 | 27 | 25.7% | |
| 🍓 | 18 | 17.1% | |
| 😱 | 13 | 12.4% | |
| 🎃 | 9 | 8.57% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 5.71% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| 🤗 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 2.86% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 2.86% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.952% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @greyshemes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (8.57%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Другое дело, что проведение мобилизации в 2026 году - решение предельно опасное политически. Обладая практически полным карт-бланшем на изменения, которые могли бы повысить лояльность населения: национализацию имущества олигархов, тотальную зачистку коррупционеров во власти, построение социального государства за пределами бесконечных "Разговоров о важном", Кремль предпочел сохранить упомянутые аспекты мирного времени…
👻3
❕ Справочно | Ведут ли гуманитарные перемирия к миру? Иногда «НП» в КББ называла перемирие в Алешках с эвакуацией мирных жителей первым звонком к урегулированию. Проверим по истории, как часто такие договорённости ведут к большему. Когда вели. Корея, 1953 год. В апреле прошла операция Little Switch — обмен больными и ранеными пленными, первая сделка после долгого тупика. В июле подписали перемирие. Колумбия, 2015 г…
Телеграм-канал Наивная политология 🌐 Специально для "Кремлевского безБашенника" точно обозначает уязвимость любой власти: граждане оценивают государственные решения не только по масштабу замысла, но и по последствиям для собственной жизни. Политика, требующая постоянных жертв без понятного результата, постепенно расходует запас доверия. Американские выборы вновь показали значение этой связи: стоимость жизни была одни…
🇷🇺 Накануне морозов регионы остаются без отопления 🗣 В Бодайбо, золотодобывающей столице России, 5 ноября снова прорвало трубопровод: без отопления и горячей воды остались жители при минус 20. Это уже вторая крупная авария за год - в январе здесь перемерз водовод, четыре котельные встали, без тепла остались более 140 домов и две школы, ЧС вводили на три недели. За неделю до ноябрьского ЧП власти отчитывались о подго…
Коммунальная инфраструктура разваливается, а Минстрой выставляет населению новый счёт за её ремонт Российская коммуналка всё чаще не справляется со своей основной задачей — обеспечивать людей теплом и водой. Для этого не нужны аномальные морозы: достаточно обычного начала отопительного сезона. ➡️ Во Владивостоке прорыв теплотрассы оставил без горячей воды 468 домов. ➡️ В Бодайбо 5 ноября при −20°C снова прорвало тру…
Годовщина начала Великого античеловеческого эксперимента 7 ноября – годовщина Великой Октябрьской социалистической революции. А что хорошего она принесла людям? Стали ли они жить лучше? Получили больше свободы, возможностей для творчества и самореализации? Нет. Октябрьский переворот не создал обещанное новое справедливое общество. Он привел к: Распаду страны. Гражданской войне. Красному и белому террору. Голоду.…
🦄4🥴3🗿1😍1
🌐 Специально для "Кремлевского безБашенника" - Телеграм-канал Наивная политология Репа и идеология Промежуточные выборы в США прошли именно так, как прогнозировали аналитики - сочетание специфических решений и манеры поведения американского президента привели к проражению республиканской партии в обеих палатах парламента. Необходимо уточнить: претензии америаканцев вызвали не сами по себе внешнеполитические мане…
🍓4
Ночная атака на Рязань: под ударом НПЗ и склад Wildberries В ночь на 5 ноября Рязань подверглась массированной атаке беспилотников. В городе гремели взрывы, повреждены линии электропередачи, в части районов начались перебои со светом. В одной из школ выбило стекла, занятия отменили. Главные последствия налёта: 🔴 Пожар на Рязанском НПЗ «Роснефти». Завод атакован второй раз за 3 недели (предыдущий удар был 15 октября…
🇷🇺 Российские регионы массово урезают здравоохранение 🗣 Врачи по всей России фиксируют сокращение финансирования своих учреждений. Опрос «Медицинского вестника», охвативший медработников из 74 городов, показал: три четверти респондентов заметили урезание расходов на здравоохранение в своих регионах. Данные Счетной палаты подтверждают: в первом полугодии 2026 года субъекты РФ потратили на медицину на 5,8% меньше, чем…
НА ТЕМУ ДНЯ Подборка постов тг-каналов от Новости сегодня Чисто для фиксации — Америка повернулась к Трампу задом. Конструктивный аналитик — есть некоторые основания предполагать, что «раздел мира» в китайской Шэньчжэне не состоится, равно как и строительство моста (тоннеля) «Чукотка-Аляска»... Scriptorium — новый Конгресс жестче настроен к Москве и, вероятно, будет продвигать санкции и помощь Киеву. Договореннос…
Красноярск больше не ждёт детей В Красноярске закрывают сразу два роддома – №4 в Зелёной Роще и №6 при 20-й больнице. Для меня это не просто здания системы здравоохранения. В четвёртом роддоме родился мой младший брат Алексей. В шестом – моя дочь Анна и мой сын Даниил. У решения о ликвидации есть рациональное объяснение. В Красноярском крае становится всё меньше детей. В 2014 году родились 44 тысячи, в 2025-м – о…
🌚3
Уважаемые коллеги «Наивная политология» справедливо отмечают: «Вокруг противостояния Кремля и Киева начала складываться ситуация, указывающая на нарастающее давление на руководство государств относительно завершения конфликта». Однако, на наш взгляд, не стоит питать излишних иллюзий, нарастание давления на руководителей государств совершенно не означает, что кто-то из них вскоре согласится на максималистские условия…
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @greyshemes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 84 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наивная политология” (@greyshemes), 6,538 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/greyshemes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.