Авторский канал Алексея Пилько о мировой политике: новости, аналитика, прогнозы.
Зарегистрирован в Роскомнадзоре: Уведомление № 040887.
Для связи: [email protected]
Created
4 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
52,500 average views per post against 59,976 subscribers — an engagement rate of 87.6%. Across the 8,382 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.04% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.6%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured
15 of 15 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
787,700
Mature posts only
92.5% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +397. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,490–60,194 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 06:36
59,976
-57
17 Sept 2026, 14:17
60,033
-10
15 Sept 2026, 13:38
60,043
-17
13 Sept 2026, 23:16
60,060
-16
12 Sept 2026, 04:42
60,076
-6
10 Sept 2026, 01:40
60,082
+1
6 Sept 2026, 20:38
60,081
-19
4 Sept 2026, 05:56
60,100
+2
2 Sept 2026, 17:23
60,098
-6
1 Sept 2026, 14:04
60,104
-9
31 Aug 2026, 10:47
60,113
+1
30 Aug 2026, 10:13
60,112
+7
29 Aug 2026, 11:49
60,105
-4
28 Aug 2026, 10:28
60,109
+18
27 Aug 2026, 13:53
60,091
+110
26 Aug 2026, 11:37
59,981
+7
25 Aug 2026, 12:59
59,974
+6
24 Aug 2026, 09:44
59,968
-30
22 Aug 2026, 15:15
59,998
-7
21 Aug 2026, 08:44
60,005
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
87.6%
avg views ÷ 59,976 subscribers
Avg views / post
52,500
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
54 (10 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
787,700
Reactions total
11,631
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 03:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈108
Videos
≈18
Links
≈2,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
52,680 reactions across 54 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
27,633
52.5%
👍
9,481
18.0%
🤔
6,481
12.3%
❤
2,888
5.48%
🔥
2,544
4.83%
😁
1,322
2.51%
👏
552
1.05%
🤨
412
0.782%
🐳
345
0.655%
🤯
299
0.568%
🙏
284
0.539%
😱
238
0.452%
😢
94
0.178%
🎅
53
0.101%
👌
32
0.061%
⚡
14
0.027%
🥰
8
0.015%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52,680 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В отношениях России и союзных Украине европейских стран наблюдается попытка деконфликтинга, хотя и достаточно формального. В очередной раз ситуация вышла на уровень "военной тревоги" и информационная истерика стала жить своей жизнью. В частности, прекрасным примером этого стала публикация в испанской газете El Mundo, посвящённая грядущим атакам российских дронов, стартующих с гражданских судов в Средиземном море, цел…
Российско-американские переговоры по украинскому вопросу на полях Генассамблеи в Нью-Йорке прогнозируемо провалились: администрация Трампа совершенно нежелает действовать в рамках достигнутых в августе прошлого года на Аляске "пониманий" и продавливает Москву как максимум на "заморозку" конфликта по линии фронта, а как минимум на энергетическое перемирие на осенне-зимний период. Кстати говоря, в этом вопросе позиция …
Стрим завершён. Видеозапись доступна на закрытом канале.
Сегодня в 18.00 мск на нашем закрытом канале состоится стрим, посвящённый вероятности большой войны в Европе и её возможным сценариям. Среди обсуждаемых вопросов:
• Почему растёт вероятность трансформации войны на Украине в большой европейский конфликт?
• Какие политические силы в Европе являются основными протагонистами большой войны?
• Что представляют со…
Администрация Трампа имеет все шансы стать самой слабой командой с момента окончания второй мировой войны, потому что не может добиться в мировой политике ровным счётом ничего. Даже полностью зависящая от неё Украина спокойно ставит хозяину Белого дома условия, а тот ничего не может поделать в ответ. Так, сегодня Зеленский в ответ на просьбу Трампа не обстреливать российские НПЗ потребовал прекратить атаки на украинс…
Саудовская Аравия оказалась в сложном положении, поскольку долгое время опиралась лишь на Соединённые Штаты в сфере безопасности. Во время биполярного противостояния и в эпоху однополярности для королевства было сложно сделать иной выбор. Однако новая реальность в мировой политике наступила слишкрм быстро и Эр-Рияд не успел к ней приготовиться. Выяснилось, что США в нынешних условиях не могут защитить своего ключевог…
Попытки брюссельской бюрократии создать своё НАТО без участия Соединённых Штатов в обозримой перспективе ни к чему не приведут. На то есть две основные причины. Во-первых, ведущим европейским странам (Франции, Германии, Италии) ещё предстоит многое сделать для развития собственных вооружённых сил, чтобы встать вровень с американцами. Во-вторых, США предпримут все возможные усилия (и даже больше), чтобы не допустить в…
Происходящие на Ближнем Востоке события показывают, что никакого однополярного мира в природе уже не существует. Потому что сложно представить себе во времена администраций Клинтона и Буша-младшего установления чьего бы то ни было контроля над важнейшими морскими коммуникациями (такими как Ормузский и Баб-эль-Мандебский проливы). Нефтяная блокада Саудовской Аравии и расстрел американских военных баз тоже вряд ли был …
Тема внутренней политики редко затрагивается на нашем канале, однако мимо нынешних парламентских выборов пройти не смогли. Обсудили с Ильей Гращенковым политическую ситуацию в стране перед началом голосования, а также некоторые злободневные темы.
В Великобритании назревает серьёзный внутриполитический кризис. Сразу три части Соединённого Королевства, Шотландия, Уэльс и Северная Ирландия, хотят из него выйти, после чего Туманный Альбион может сжаться до размеров одной только Англии. Первый министр Шотландии Джон Суинни вообще призывает готовиться к post-UK world (то есть к миру, где Великобритании не существует). Насколько реальна такая перспектива?
В среднес…
Иран переходит на Ближнем Востоке в наступление, в то время как позиции США сегодня кажутся чрезвычайно уязвимыми. Можно считать доказанным, что конвенциональной (неядерной) военной мощи Соединённых Штатов недостаточно, для того чтобы одержать победу в военном конфликте с Тегераном. Но даже ничьёй не получается: администрация Трампа была бы рада заключить соглашение, предусматривающее статус-кво с Ираном. Однако тот …
На Ближнем Востоке может решиться судьба промежуточных выборов в американский Конгресс: йеменские хуситы (иранские прокси) начали решительное наступление на суше и на море с целью улучшить свои позиции в районе Баб-эль-Мандебского пролива. Надо сказать, что этим "бородачам и тапочникам" уже многое удалось: взят под контроль имеющий стратегическое значение порт Моха на побережье Красного моря и остров Зухар, начались…
👍486💯287🤔112❤90🔥46👏10😁10🙏8
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @pintofmind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@pintofmind edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 64 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 57 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Олег Ясинский @olegyasynsky · 59,135 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Ватфор | Автострадный think tank @vatfor · 31,656 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
Павел Щелин. Официальный канал. @common_sen · 82,524 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Алексей Бобровский @alexbobrowski · 37,112 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева @dimonundmir · 207,632 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
У Жукова @uzhukova · 41,414 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Парламент с Кнопкой @parbut · 33,226 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Коты и кошка Крамника @kramnikcat · 39,195 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
kolobok1973 @kolobok1973 · 21,636 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 September 2026
Глебсмит @glebsmith77 · 28,144 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
РУССТРАТ @russtrat · 107,731 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Россия в глобальной политике @ru_global · 54,489 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Елена Панина @EvPanina · 136,131 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Простые числа @primenumbers2021 · 68,526 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Клим Жуков @klimzhukoff · 138,297 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Пока вы спали @pvsgns · 27,427 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Семен Уралов @su2050 · 81,037 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Шемякин, усни! @gillshem · 38,776 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Евгений Спицын @SpicynEY · 28,905 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
ЦИФРОВАЯ ИСТОРИЯ – Егор Яковлев @egoryakovleff · 61,687 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пинта разума” (@pintofmind), 59,976 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pintofmind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
