Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CatNews

@cat0news

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,387subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001228357942
TypeChannel
Username@cat0news
DescriptionНовости и аналитика с дивана от авторов CatCat. Доступно и весело объясняем, что сейчас происходит в стране и мире. Связь: @adikob Мы в ВК: https://vk.com/cat0news Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3EbvnE Подкинуть денег на сходки: 5228600552506711
Created17 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cat0news

Growth

19,38419,39319,388.56 August 2026 — 19,392 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,392 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,393 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,387 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,390 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,384 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,385 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,390 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,387 subscribers19,3876 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,383–19,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:5419,387-3
11 Aug 2026, 14:4519,390+5
10 Aug 2026, 11:5819,385+1
9 Aug 2026, 13:0119,384-6
8 Aug 2026, 16:1619,390+3
7 Aug 2026, 15:3019,387-6
6 Aug 2026, 14:2019,393+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:0719,392no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4819,392first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.9%
avg views ÷ 19,387 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,120
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held54 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total430,290
Reactions total18,112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,400
Videos
1,840
Links
5,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

14,635 reactions across 45 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁4,09328.0%
2,60617.8%
👍1,0347.07%
💯9596.55%
🥰8445.77%
🔥8295.66%
custom 54564334877183901638275.65%
🌚5864.00%
🤣5463.73%
🤡4673.19%
🙏4633.16%
🫡2982.04%
😢2271.55%
🤔1871.28%
🥱1460.998%
🎉530.362%
💊460.314%
450.307%
🤬330.225%
🥴320.219%
27 further kinds3142.15%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 53 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cat0news. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC≈3,990 views251 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❗️Путин не хочет останавливать войну, но он её остановит. У нас есть план, — Зеленский По словам президента, нам нужно перенести войну на территорию России, после этого россияне ощутят на себе последствия войны и будут оказывать давление на власть. Приходит министр сельского хозяйства к М. С. Горбачеву. — Михаил Сергеевич, беда, в стране куры дохнут. — Ничего страшного, нарисуйте перед каждой курицей желтый круг.

😁211👏15🤣15🤡72🥱1

Signed Сергей

12 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈5,770 views197 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Грёбаные хохлы меня разочаровали((( У них (ВНЕЗАПНО) есть свои вечно драматизирующие и паникующие журнашлюхи. Вижу пост, мол, клята русня сожгла нам 1 млн м2 складов @@@ ОТЛИЧНО, ДУМАЮ, ЗА ПАРУ НЕДЕЛЬ ПЕРЕПЛЮНУЛИ УДАРЫ ХОХЛОВ, МОЛОДЦЫ! @@@ Хрен там, подтверждения перемоги пока нема В оригинале статьи прописано что это площадь уничтоженных складов с 22го года и по июнь 26го (ну точнее так прописано в оригинальном ис

🌚101😁4317🤡9🤔7🥴6👍4🔥3

Signed Александр Соцкий

12 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈5,920 views115 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Dark_files_archive

Этот вопрос мне довольно часто задавали в комментариях на различных платформах. Сегодня я постараюсь ответить на него, используя США в качестве примера. Там самые открытые источники, проведено больше всего профильных исследований, да и в целом там было поймано больше маньяков, чем в любой другой стране. К слову, статья родилась благодаря одному из вопросов моей подписчицы, заданных в комментах, а после дополнена и д

🔥80👍25🤔54🥴1

Signed Александр Соцкий

12 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈6,430 views242 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Anthropic забыли закрыть дверь. А у OpenAI нейронка нашла выход сама В прошлом посте я разбирала историю Anthropic, где Claude якобы «сбежал в интернет». Там всё оказалось довольно прозаично: тестовую среду настроили криво, интернет в ней уже был, а самой модели при этом сказали, что никакого настоящего интернета быть не может. У OpenAI история неприятнее, потому что здесь дверь уже была закрыта, а агент реально на

143🤔46👍23👎7🔥7🤯6👀4🥱4

Signed Александр Соцкий

12 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈6,560 views165 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Продолжается веселье вокруг Панамского канала. Аукционные ставки на проход через него выросли в 16 раз (год к году) на фоне войны с Ираном и угрозы засухи Средняя стоимость слота, приобретаемого на ежедневном аукционе для прохода через Панамский канал, в августе достигла примерно $1,1 млн. Речь при этом идёт не о стандартном тарифе за транзит через канал, а о дополнительной плате за ограниченное число слотов, распре

custom 545643348771839016311031🔥16🥱3👍2🖕2🤔1

Signed Александр Соцкий

12 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC≈6,870 views290 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну все постят своих котов и я хочу - Семён, Сема, булочка. Спокойный кот - пофигист моих родителей, найденыш с улицы ( родители предполагают что его выбросили) , но иногда любит ласку, очень милый и спокойный. Любим всей семьёй Присылайте фото своих домашних и не очень животных с коротким комментарием в лс канала, если хотите, чтобы весь канал умилился вместе с вами! #ВМиреЖивотных

188🥰80🔥10👍5🥱3💩2🤗2

11 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈7,350 views204 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всем привет! Прошел уже месяц после введения 10 июля запрета на судоходство через Азовское море и Керченский пролив. Давайте поговорим об этом. Что случилось? С начала июля на корабли, следующие по маршруту через Азовское море, были совершены множественные нападения. Первыми об ограничении судоходства сообщили, как не странно, журналисты из иностранного Reuters. Источники крупнейших деловых СМИ России (Forbes Russi

custom 545643348771839016314334🤔148👍2❤‍🔥1💅1🖕1

Signed Александр Соцкий

11 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC≈7,680 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🎉5315🔥11👍1

Signed Александр Соцкий

11 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC≈7,680 views223 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Господа, вы спрашивали, за кого же вам голосовать на выборах Думу? Ну вот и ответ!

🫡115😁70😭13🤣12🖕5🤡52🔥1

Signed Александр Соцкий

11 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈8,120 views354 reactionsread 12 August 2026

По ТГ опять гуляет скрин с якобы частного канала Шария с ИНСАЙДАМИ о том, что на днях в небе над Москвой взорвалась ядерка. При всей моей горячей любви к этому деятелю, стоит отметить, что это хохлятский фейк-фотожоп и Шарий ничего такого не писал... Но, как говорится, вот что значит РЕПУТАЦИЯ. На фоне того говна, которым любитель шпицев кормит своих подписчиков и его ИНСАЙДОВ, которые публикуются либо после события,

😁258🤣73🥰9🥱7👏3🤡21👍1

Signed Александр Соцкий

11 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈7,630 views314 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🌚13986custom 545643348771839016340👍24🔥12🥱10💩2😁1

Signed Александр Соцкий

11 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈7,870 views259 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Энигма, совсем ещё мелкая) Присылайте фото своих домашних и не очень животных с коротким комментарием в лс канала, если хотите, чтобы весь канал умилился вместе с вами! #ВМиреЖивотных

168🥰70❤‍🔥8👏4👍3🥱3💩2🤗1

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @cat0news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTCAnonymous Poll4,480 voters approx.

В данный момент я...

  1. Состою в постоянных отношениях с одним партнёром22%
  2. Никогда не состоял(а) в отношениях21%
  3. Часто меняю партнёров1%
  4. Состоял(а) в отношениях, сейчас одинок(а)21%
  5. Замужем/Женат33%
  6. В процесса развода/разведен(а)2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 6,573 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Картавых Александр
@AlexCarrier · 147,575
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CatNews” (@cat0news), 19,387 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cat0news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.