🇺🇸 A violent three-car crash in #Victorville, #California, split a Honda Accord in half and sent a Dodge Charger flipping off the road. Multiple people were hospitalized with minor injuries. Follow us -> LiveLeak
🌚10👍3🤣3

Channel
@leaklive
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
143,727subscribers
-135 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001419385125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leaklive |
| Description | Legendary LiveLeak in Telegram! Redefining the media. This is the only one LiveLeak channel. All the others are fake and have nothing to do with us! Send your video - @liveleak_bot For any questions - @fidel_castro 18+ - https://t.me/+Y2KNn-8LfV4yNjgy |
| Created | 2 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leaklive |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 143,727 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 143,743 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 143,740 | +15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 143,725 | -55 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 143,780 | -27 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 143,807 | -57 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 143,864 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 143,862 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 143,862 | first reading |
89 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 89 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 573,044 |
| Reactions total | 16,415 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 81 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15,574 reactions across 84 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌚 | 4,833 | 31.0% | |
| 🤣 | 2,164 | 13.9% | |
| 💩 | 1,615 | 10.4% | |
| 🤬 | 826 | 5.30% | |
| 👏 | 818 | 5.25% | |
| 🤡 | 814 | 5.23% | |
| 🏆 | 583 | 3.74% | |
| 😱 | 535 | 3.44% | |
| 🙏 | 507 | 3.26% | |
| 😢 | 442 | 2.84% | |
| 🔥 | 345 | 2.22% | |
| ❤ | 342 | 2.20% | |
| 😁 | 315 | 2.02% | |
| 👍 | 244 | 1.57% | |
| 🫡 | 222 | 1.43% | |
| 😡 | 182 | 1.17% | |
| 🕊 | 177 | 1.14% | |
| 🖕 | 122 | 0.783% | |
| 🤯 | 111 | 0.713% | |
| 🤔 | 85 | 0.546% | |
| 7 further kinds | 292 | 1.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,415reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸 A violent three-car crash in #Victorville, #California, split a Honda Accord in half and sent a Dodge Charger flipping off the road. Multiple people were hospitalized with minor injuries. Follow us -> LiveLeak
🌚10👍3🤣3
Republic of #Dagestan. Elevator plummets 50 feet and breaks 4 men's legs as it crashed into the ground. A building suffered from a failed elevator after 9 men got onto an elevator meant to hold only 6. Officials say the elevator fell from the 4th floor to the ground, and the men can be seen being tossed into each other and collapsing onto the ground. The building never received a commissioning certificate from housi…
😱25💩11🤯6😁5🌚4
🇺🇸 Rabid responders' in Vineland, #NewJersey lost it on local police during an ICE detention. Cops calmly said the agents are doing their job. Then they started calling the police “fucking clowns” for refusing to interfere with a lawful federal operation. Follow us -> LiveLeak
🤡53🌚9🤔4❤3🤯1
🇺🇸 Woman in the dressing room of a Nordstrom allegedly caught a man recording her under the stall door in Southern #California. Sophia Schades alleges the man hit a phone in a crumpled-up shirt on the ground and was recording underneath the wall of the dressing room stall. Mall security said they would keep an eye on him, but by the time police arrived, the unidentified man had gotten away. An investigation is under…
💩69🌚31🤣10❤4🤯2😱1
🇺🇸 #NewYork. Insane brawl breaks out in McDonalds. These “teen takeovers” are no longer random fights.. And teenagers wonder why so many stores are banning them now. Seriously? Follow us -> LiveLeak
🌚109💩28🤡11🤣5👍4😡2❤1🤯1
🇵🇱 A 4-year-old girl fell from a fifth-floor balcony in Łomża, #Poland, but neighbors managed to break her fall with a blanket. Her mother was reportedly asleep inside the apartment and later tested at 0.7‰ blood alcohol. Follow us -> LiveLeak
🙏100🫡42🏆19❤13😱10💩9👏3🤣3
🇪🇸 #Spain. An immigrant, like an animal, wreaked havoc on on Line 4 of the Barcelona Metro at the Barceloneta station yesterday afternoon, forcing the entire line to shut down. Follow us -> LiveLeak
🌚174💩52🤣32🤬9🤡6🖕5😭2❤1
🇺🇸 A suspect lost his pants after crashing his bike into a fence while fleeing police in Columbus, #Ohio, sending him flying over the fence before officers continued the chase on foot. Mikelle Smith caught the encounter on his home security camera and said, "This man left his keys and his dignity in our yard." Is that fence only visible to certain people? Bc the suspect & cop #2 act like it wasn't even there.. Fol…
🤣85😁36🤡9❤4🖕4👾2🕊2🙏2
🇦🇺 #Australia, Burwood. Police tase knife-wielding suspect twice during chaotic foot pursuit near a shopping complex. When police moved in to speak with two men, they allegedly ran, triggering a foot pursuit through the area. Police chased two men through an Australian suburb on Monday afternoon before a 43-year-old was subdued with a Taser and arrested after allegedly carrying two knives. A 32-year-old man was also…
🌚42😁17🤡16👍13💩7❤4🖕3🤮1
🇨🇳 #China. Flame festival in Jiangsu goes sideways when a performer catches fire and stands there burning while everyone watches. It’s a flame festival of course there isn’t a fire extinguisher. Follow us -> LiveLeak
🤡78🔥30😭19🙏12🤣11❤9💩7🌚2
🇺🇸 Flames shoot from an American Airlines jet engine moments after it strikes birds during takeoff from #MyrtleBeach, forcing the pilot to declare a mayday. The Boeing 737 quickly turns back as crews prepare for an emergency response on the ground. The plane lands safely with all 181 passengers safe after the midair scare. Follow us -> LiveLeak
👏68🔥24🙏15💩10🤡7🤣4❤3🌚3
🇨🇳 #China. A man has been arrested after a going on a stabbing spree in Hong Kong. Two people were stabbed during the attack and are expected to live. 22 year old man (according to preliminary data, a Bangladeshi citizen) stabbed a domestic helper in the neck and back and grazed a security guard with a fruit knife. Police arrested him on the spot. Follow us -> LiveLeak
💩102🌚47🤯6😡6🖕4❤2🤣2😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @leaklive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@leaklive edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 18,332 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LiveLeak” (@leaklive), 143,727 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leaklive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.