🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Sweden may sell up to 20 CB90-class fast assault craft to France in 2027, following French Navy trials of the Swedish-built combat boats. 🇸🇪🇫🇷⚓ || Stockholm and Paris are moving closer on a potential naval deal involving Sweden’s proven CB90 fast assault craft. 🛥️ The CB90 is designed for rapid littoral operations, troop transport, patrol missions and fast insertion in coastal waters. 🛰️ French Navy tr…

Channel
Resonant News 📰
@ResonantNews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,625subscribers
-374 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001407087072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ResonantNews |
| Description | Resonates with truth! YouTube Channel: https://youtube.com/c/ResonantNews |
| Created | 28 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ResonantNews |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 14:17 | 21,625 | +13 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 06:01 | 21,612 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:35 | 21,613 | +7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:44 | 21,606 | -10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:38 | 21,616 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:20 | 21,620 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:41 | 21,633 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:26 | 21,634 | +6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:48 | 21,628 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 21,633 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:51 | 21,641 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:58 | 21,639 | -11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 21,650 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:25 | 21,653 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 21,662 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 21,665 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 21,672 | +12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:54 | 21,660 | -13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:42 | 21,673 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:48 | 21,683 | first reading |
Engagement
946 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.41%
- avg views ÷ 21,625 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 955
- 247 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.81%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 247
- of 946 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 246 of 247 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 946 (6 August 2026 – 15 November 2026) |
| Views total | 235,813 |
| Reactions total | 6,620 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈28,000
- Videos
- ≈7,190
- Links
- ≈11,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 59m
- Average length
- 59s
Measured directly from 183 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,651 reactions across 941 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8,306 | 32.4% | |
| ❤ | 4,257 | 16.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3,172 | 12.4% | |
| 😡 | 2,984 | 11.6% | |
| 😁 | 2,628 | 10.2% | |
| 👀 | 1,321 | 5.15% | |
| 🙏 | 810 | 3.16% | |
| 💯 | 447 | 1.74% | |
| 👌 | 440 | 1.72% | |
| 🫡 | 284 | 1.11% | |
| 🤔 | 227 | 0.885% | |
| 🤯 | 224 | 0.873% | |
| 🤨 | 215 | 0.838% | |
| 😢 | 127 | 0.495% | |
| ⚡ | 117 | 0.456% | |
| 🆒 | 59 | 0.23% | |
| 🤩 | 33 | 0.129% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 942 of the 946 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,651 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 946 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 247 posts held from the last 30 days (2.43%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: India has said it seeks a positive, constructive and forward-looking relationship with Bangladesh amid ongoing diplomatic friction and the postponement of their consular dialogue. 🇮🇳🇧🇩🤝 || New Delhi says it remains ready to discuss all bilateral issues through existing institutional and technical-level mechanisms. 🛃 The next India-Bangladesh Consular Dialogue, which was scheduled for next week, has been…
👍2
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: The DPIIT and Department of Commerce have been formally confirmed as competent authorities to issue industrial licences for defence manufacturing in India. 🇮🇳🏭 || The clarification comes under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. 🏢 DPIIT can issue licences for defence manufacturers located outside Special Economic Zones. 🌍 The Department of Commerce can issue licences for units within…
👍3
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Iran’s Hengam-class warship IRIS Lavan remains at Kochi port as India, Iran and port authorities coordinate conditions for its safe return. 🇮🇳🇮🇷⚓ || The vessel entered Kochi on March 4, 2026 after Iran sought emergency port access amid regional conflict and technical difficulties. 🛟 India permitted the entry on humanitarian grounds, with the ship carrying 183 people at the time, including young naval ca…
👍8❤2
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: The proposed 489-km Bilaspur-Manali-Leh railway line is being positioned as a major strategic logistics corridor for sustaining Indian forces in Ladakh. 🇮🇳🚆 || The estimated ₹1.31 lakh crore project would create an additional weather-resilient supply route to Leh. 🛰️ The Ministry of Railways has completed the Final Location Survey and prepared a Detailed Project Report, though construction approval is s…
❤9👍3👌1
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: The US Air Force has confirmed that its B-21 Raider stealth bomber has conducted its first weapons-release test, releasing a conventional weapon during a flight from Edwards Air Force Base, California. 🇺🇸✈️ || The test validates the B-21’s digital models and the maturity of its open-systems architecture. 🛰️ The US Air Force did not disclose the type of conventional weapon released during the early-Novem…
👍3❤1😁1
🚨 Court orders AIIMS medical treatment for Tahawur Hussain Rana- 26/11 Mumbai attack case A Special NIA Court in New Delhi has directed Tihar Jail authorities to provide comprehensive medical treatment to Tahawur Hussain Rana and arrange his examination at AIIMS. • Rana reportedly raised ENT and orthopaedic medical concerns. • The court also directed authorities to provide him with his complete medical records. • R…
😡29👍2
🚨 Chinese military aircraft reportedly breaches Indian airspace, hovers near Sikkim for 20–25 minutes A Chinese military aircraft reportedly entered Indian airspace near Sikkim on November 12, remaining in the area for around 20–25 minutes, according to a source cited by Outlook. Key details: • Detected by the Indian Air Force around 8 AM • Reportedly flying at approximately 25,000 feet • The IAF allegedly issued …
😡37❤5
LIVE SESSION: China Military Update: EP:13—- ROCKET FORCE SPECIAL; Join link at 10pm IST: https://youtube.com/live/RrKKVyCd4cw?feature=share
👍8
🔴 Pashtun leader Sher Afzal Marwat voices support for PoJK protesters “The people of Rawalakot are your own people — you should stand with them.” He claimed corruption in PoJK could be as high as 80%, while comparing it with 60% in Peshawar @kashmirdisinfolab
😁13❤11👍5
🚨 India backs UN resolution affirming Palestinian sovereignty over natural resources India voted in favour as the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly adopted a resolution reaffirming the Palestinian people's rights over their land, water and energy resources. 151 countries, including India, supported the resolution, while Israel and the United States were among seven nations voting against it. Eleven countries absta…
😡16👀9🔥3🤨1
🔴 Hindu demonstrators march in Dhaka, demanding Chinmoy Krishna Das’s release Hindu demonstrators marching in Dhaka and demanding the release of Hindu monk Chinmoy Krishna Das. Das was arrested in November 2024 in connection with a sedition case and has remained entangled in multiple legal proceedings. Despite reportedly receiving bail in some cases, other pending cases have kept him in custody, according to report…
👍24❤13🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 946 posts we hold for @ResonantNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@conflictwatchHQ · 1,27624 postsKashmir Disinfo Lab
@kashmirdisinfolab · 93610 postsPeshawari Kabab & Kisse 🎤
@kababkekisse · 884 postsKhorsan Chronicles
@khorsanchronicles · 2354 postsPakistan Strategic Watch 🇵🇰
@pakistanwatch · 953 postsSouth Asia Compass
@southasiacompass · 761 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@conflictwatchHQ · 1,27624 postsKashmir Disinfo Lab
@kashmirdisinfolab · 93610 postsKhorsan Chronicles
@khorsanchronicles · 2354 postsUP POLY STUDY WITH RR
@IndianNavy · 742 postsPakistan Strategic Watch 🇵🇰
@pakistanwatch · 952 postsSouth Asia Compass
@southasiacompass · 761 postZEE NEWS
@ZeeNews · 8,0921 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 9
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ResonantNews named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 7 November 2026 – 8 November 2026
named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 19 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 November 2026 – 11 November 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@MeghUpdates · 74,953#1
@geo_grandmasters · 76,140#2
@IntelSage · 13,653#3
@OsntTV · 45,659#4
@ThreeSixtyDegrees · 16,438#5
@DevelopmentNewsIndia · 22,018#6
@PoliticsUntold · 25,891#7
@bharat_voice · 8,285#8
@DDGeopolitics · 189,792#9
@indianmilitarynews · 14,326#10
@diplomatic_delta · 14,689#11
@AryavartaUpdates · 6,743#12
@Starboy2079 · 8,572#13
@Intel_Republic12 · 94,200#14
@ArunPudurTelegram · 2,242#15
@bharatkshetra · 3,828#16
@TheIslanderNews · 61,566#17
@asiabrief · 13,427#18
@globaldissident · 8,274#19
@deftalksaadi · 5,044#20
@global_scenes · 4,046#21
@intelslava · 385,254#22
@ThatsHaramBro · 2,151#23
@thejaipurdialogues · 9,216#24
@pgurus1 · 3,665#25
@PoliticsZonee · 14,697#26
@mediacrook · 828#27
@node_of_time_en · 19,837#28
@TeamCharlie9 · 13#29
@gnntelegram · 3,173#30
@European_dissident · 69,176#31
@R_Diplomat · 19,815#32
@Legalhindudef · 1,154#33
@worldpravda · 53,431#34
@AskAbhijeet · 4,376#35
@Onfrabmusic · 46,866#36
@epanchjanya · 5,738#37
@DGPIndia · 90,312#38
@geopolitics_prime · 288,752#39
@angrysaffron · 26,993#40
@VidurNeeti · 10,562#41
@beinginformed1 · 2,685#42
@AlternateMedia_GayatriDevi · 7,159#43
@angrysaffrondharma · 5,753#44
@Slavyangrad · 111,501#45
@militarywave · 41,243#46
@warhorizon · 909#47
@myLordBebo · 71,924#48
@kashmirdisinfolab · 936#49
@DSquadOfficial · 82,069#50
@middle_east_spectator · 395,468#51
@Hindustanibeast · 6,561#52
@multipolarmarket · 26,781#53
@infodefENGLAND · 50,392#54
@BellumActaNews · 107,878#55
@rashtriya_rifles · 4,531#56
@Pakistan_Untold · 2,493#57
@gemsofindology · 2,298#58
@ukraine_watch · 69,157#59
@hindupost · 1,329#60
@AshwiniSahaya · 5,034#61
@hnaftali · 117,821#62
@two_majors · 47,608#63
@CIG_telegram · 114,501#64
@rnintel · 160,265#65
@warmonitors · 149,622#66
@fortheberets · 1,969#67
@ukr_leaks_eng · 74,905#68
@medmannews · 76,534#69
@SattologyCourse · 2,546#70
@yourantifakenews · 19,200#71
@sitreports · 22,851#72
@disclosetv · 316,528#73
@TheTreeni · 3,345#74
@politicalkida · 4,865#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@majormadhankumarmmk · 30,547
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
@OsntTV · 45,659
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
@MeghUpdates · 74,953
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@geo_grandmasters · 76,140
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@DevelopmentNewsIndia · 22,018
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
@PDFKING · 33,011
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
@MyGovCoronaNewsdesk · 365,528
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@PoliticsUntold · 25,891
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 15 September 2026
@DhawanSir · 136,581
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
@DSquadOfficial · 82,069
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
@DGPIndia · 90,312
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@moneycontrolcom · 231,056
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@angrysaffron · 26,993
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 11 September 2026
@gharkekaleshh · 72,661
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 August 2026
@hindustantimes · 62,753
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
@indianexpress · 121,791
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
@ssbclear · 23,322
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 18 September 2026
@Hindustan · 19,114
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
@multipolarmarket · 26,781
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
@yourantifakenews · 19,200
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
@thenewindianexpress · 20,992
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@Sadhguru · 22,425
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@ignourcdelhi3 · 43,141
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 31 August 2026
@Insightssbafcat · 56,914
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Resonant News 📰” (@ResonantNews), 21,625 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ResonantNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.