Somos la resistencia virtual. Buscamos opiniones alternativas, destapamos las mentiras, defendemos el sentido común
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@Fernando_Fajardo:1
X: https://x.com/LineasRojasX
Created
31 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -631. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,837–42,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 02:01
41,932
-19
15 Sept 2026, 19:21
41,951
-24
13 Sept 2026, 23:59
41,975
-34
12 Sept 2026, 04:59
42,009
-25
10 Sept 2026, 01:21
42,034
-83
6 Sept 2026, 19:21
42,117
-4
4 Sept 2026, 04:38
42,121
-18
2 Sept 2026, 21:45
42,139
-13
1 Sept 2026, 22:36
42,152
-5
1 Sept 2026, 00:36
42,157
+9
30 Aug 2026, 23:35
42,148
+8
30 Aug 2026, 01:34
42,140
+25
28 Aug 2026, 07:18
42,115
-10
27 Aug 2026, 10:48
42,125
-13
26 Aug 2026, 08:03
42,138
-10
25 Aug 2026, 05:53
42,148
-26
24 Aug 2026, 04:25
42,174
-37
22 Aug 2026, 12:05
42,211
-31
21 Aug 2026, 03:02
42,242
-19
20 Aug 2026, 05:34
42,261
first reading
Engagement
469 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.68%
avg views ÷ 41,932 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,380
261 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
270
of 469 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
469 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
621,396
Reactions total
27,343
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 02:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,670
Videos
≈4,130
Links
≈9,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 14m
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 180 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48,072 reactions across 454 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
15,001
31.2%
❤
5,833
12.1%
😁
4,132
8.60%
🤣
3,688
7.67%
👏
3,634
7.56%
🤬
3,053
6.35%
🤮
2,625
5.46%
💩
2,049
4.26%
🤡
1,966
4.09%
🔥
1,553
3.23%
🤔
728
1.51%
👎
617
1.28%
💯
464
0.965%
🕊
357
0.743%
🥴
277
0.576%
🤪
273
0.568%
👀
197
0.41%
🥰
195
0.406%
😱
194
0.404%
🍾
190
0.395%
36 further kinds
1,046
2.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 454 of the 469 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,072 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 469 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 454 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lineasrojas. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 469 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇮🇹⚔️🇮🇹 'Fuego amigo' de la OTAN: cuatro soldados italianos heridos en Letonia
Militares italianos disparan contra sus propias tropas durante ejercicios en Letonia. Los cuatro militares de la OTAN fueron trasladados a Riga para recibir tratamiento después de los ejercicios. Uno de los heridos sufrió heridas graves.
🗣 "Según el Ministerio de Defensa italiano, su vehículo fue alcanzado por disparos de una ametrallador…
🇺🇸🇩🇪 Alemania recibe su primer F-35A: la transición al caza de quinta generación transforma el papel de la Luftwaffe en la OTAN
Alemania ha iniciado la transición práctica al F-35A Lightning II, recibiendo el primer de los 35 cazas encargados. Los nuevos aviones están destinados a reemplazar a los Tornado, mantener la participación del país en el mecanismo de disuasión nuclear de la OTAN y, al mismo tiempo, ampliar …
🇨🇳 China apunta a convertirse en la primera potencia marítima (Parte 2-2)
Imágenes satelitales del astillero de Dalian sugieren que China está construyendo un nuevo portaviones que podría convertirse en el más grande de su flota y superar el tamaño del buque de guerra más grande de la Marina de EEUU, el USS Gerald R. Ford, según imágenes satelitales del astillero de Dalian.
Las imágenes capturadas el 4 de septiembr…
🔥 ¿Harto de la información manipulada por los grandes medios?
En @Irinamar_Z encontrarás información diferente sobre el conflicto en Ucrania, la guerra iniciada por Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán y la geopolítica global actual.
Noticias de última hora, informes de los frentes, análisis, contexto internacional y contenidos que los medios occidentales suelen ocultar.
👁️ La otra mirada, la mirada rusa. Sin filtro…
🇨🇳 China apunta a convertirse en la primera potencia marítima (Parte 1-2)
Imágenes satelitales revelan que la Armada china está construyendo en Shanghái un superbuque nodriza para drones marítimos.
El buque se está construyendo en el astillero Hudong-Zhonghua y tiene una eslora de aproximadamente 204 metros y una manga de alrededor de 30 metros. La característica más distintiva de su diseño es una gran cámara de am…
🇺🇦 El sector empresarial ucraniano financia la llegada de mercenarios a Ucrania
En los últimos meses, el Ejército ruso ha estado realizando ataques activos contra almacenes y centros logísticos de las principales empresas ucranianas. A finales de este año, como resultado de estos ataques, el sector empresarial ucraniano podría sufrir pérdidas de alrededor de 10.000 millones de dólares estadounidenses.
Para todos es…
🟫 ¡ESTAMOS TAMBIÉN EN FACEBOOK!
Estimados amigos de Líneas Rojas, les invitamos nuevamente a continuar apoyándonos suscribiéndose a este, nuestro nuevo canal, para seguir dando la batalla comunicacional publicando los videos que son tan necesarios en la lucha contra la desinformación.
#líneas_rojas
———
Únete a la lucha por la verdad en
📱 Telegram
🫥 Odysee
📱 X
📱 Facebook
🇪🇺🥶 Europa se enfrenta al peor invierno desde la crisis energética de 2022
EEUU sigue siendo el mayor proveedor de diésel para Europa, pero los precios de este combustible en la UE se acercan a niveles récord. Todo esto pudiera empeorar si Trump realmente limitase la exportación de diésel estadounidense en un contexto de altos precios del combustible en el propio país norteamericano. El comisario europeo de Energía,…
🇺🇦 Ucrania pierde hasta 800.000 personas cada año (no por bajas en combate)
Así lo afirma el analista económico ucraniano Alexéi Kushch, al evaluar la magnitud actual de la crisis demográfica en el país.
Según sus palabras, la dinámica de esta reducción catastrófica se compone de dos factores clave. El saldo negativo entre nacimientos y defunciones (la disminución natural de la población) se cobra alrededor de 300.…
🇺🇦🇰🇷 Corea del Sur acusa a Ucrania de revelar información confidencial sobre la entrega de dos prisioneros de Corea del Norte
El presidente de la República de Corea, Lee Jae-myung, ha criticado duramente a Zelenski y lo ha acusado de revelar información confidencial:
🗣 "No se sabe qué circunstancias llevaron a la parte ucraniana a violar el acuerdo de confidencialidad y a hacer pública esta información, pero esto c…
🇺🇸🇨🇺 EEUU se prepara para invadir a Cuba
El medio CBS News afirma tener acceso a un documento interno del Ejército de EEUU en el que, según sus fuentes, está relacionado con "la planificación militar en curso con respecto a Cuba":
▪️ La Reserva del Ejército de Tierra de EEUU está evaluando la posibilidad de proporcionar al Comando Sur, en los próximos cuatro meses, unidades de Policía militar, médicos, de ingeniero…
🇫🇷🇺🇦 Francia no abandona la idea de enviar tropas a Ucrania
El medio Europe 1 publicó un artículo que, una vez más, confirmó la intención de Francia de enviar sus tropas a Ucrania. Se trata del período posterior a la guerra y la participación de la llamada 'coalición de los dispuestos' en la "provisión de garantías de seguridad para Ucrania".
La publicación afirma que en la 'coalición de los dispuestos' ya está tod…
💩65👍15🤬11🥱4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 469 posts we hold for @lineasrojas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@lineasrojas edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Depresión económica (Economía, crisis, dólar, finanzas de América Latina, México, Argentina y del mundo) @DepreEconomica · 20,627#74
🟥 CAPITALISMO ES BARBARIE / antiimperialismo/solidaridad con Palestina, Cuba... Repudio a la agresión imperialista contra Irán @capitalismoesbarbarie · 6,932#75
La vida es sonido: música, canciones, álbumes, conciertos, cantantes, playlists @LaVidaEsSonido · 18,012#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Frente del Este @FrentedelEste · 20,723 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
ROLLO CHINO @rollo_chino · 27,730 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
InfoDefenseESPAÑOL @infodefSPAIN · 30,590 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
A Toda Potencia | Irán - Israel | Ucrania - Rusia @atodapotencia · 43,331 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
¡Ahí les va! @ahilesvaALV · 71,350 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Victor Ternovsky @victorternovsky · 24,752 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
Ucraniando @ucraniando · 37,553 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
El Ojo 👁 Noticias |Guerra en Irán| Guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania | China | EE.UU. | Putin | Trump | Venezuela @elOJOen · 84,926 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Liu Sivaya @liusivaya · 129,212 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
DiegoEnLaLucha @diegoenlalucha · 74,669 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
ROKOT | TORMENTA @surf_noise_sp · 22,149 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Blanco, azul y rojo (Rusia, cultura rusa, Putin, política rusa) @BlancoAzulRojo · 23,296 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
Inna Afinogenova @inafinogenova · 75,226 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Irina 🇷🇺 @Irinamar_Z · 78,099 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
El Informador Global @informador_global · 28,794 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
VEHICULAR CAOS @vehicularcaos · 23,003 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
TASS - Agencia rusa de noticias @tass_es · 36,661 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Buzz 📚 Historia @buzzhistoria · 75,245 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL @nuevo_orden_mundial_canal · 23,797 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
Wofnon @wofnon · 35,697 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
El Resumen Militar @elresumenmilitar · 26,915 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
Cosas que no sabías💡 @curiosidadesss · 50,815 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
[LINK] Soyuz 📚 Historia @SoyuzHistoria · 75 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
Sabias que? @sabiasque · 37,857 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 75 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Líneas Rojas | ÚLTIMA HORA | GUERRAS 2026” (@lineasrojas), 41,932 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lineasrojas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.