9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +240. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,008–77,320 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 18:38
77,284
+14
13 Aug 2026, 06:48
77,270
+6
12 Aug 2026, 06:52
77,264
-1
11 Aug 2026, 05:46
77,265
+37
10 Aug 2026, 04:31
77,228
+34
9 Aug 2026, 03:11
77,194
+61
8 Aug 2026, 00:51
77,133
+55
7 Aug 2026, 00:56
77,078
+34
6 Aug 2026, 08:01
77,044
first reading
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 77,284 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
99 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
100 (5 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
999,510
Reactions total
20,695
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 09s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,113 reactions across 93 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,709
24.6%
❤
2,814
14.7%
🖕
2,057
10.8%
😡
1,898
9.93%
🔥
1,712
8.96%
😁
1,357
7.10%
🤣
1,234
6.46%
👏
699
3.66%
🍾
349
1.83%
🙏
334
1.75%
💊
309
1.62%
🫡
279
1.46%
🤪
258
1.35%
🤔
250
1.31%
💯
195
1.02%
❤🔥
102
0.534%
🦄
82
0.429%
🤯
56
0.293%
😴
45
0.235%
🏆
39
0.204%
24 further kinds
335
1.75%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,695reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
116
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 99 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @militarysummary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 100 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇷🇺 Lavrov:
Russia ❌ does not agree to a halt to the conflict along the line of contact, as this would erase the feat of our ancestors who defeated Nazism.
Moscow also considers it unacceptable if our 🇷🇸 Serbian brothers participate in financing the Kyiv regime. At the same time, ending 🇺🇸 American support for 🇺🇦 Ukraine will not be a precondition for negotiations.
Putin is ready to receive Witkoff and Kushner agai…
The Russian Defense Ministry is promising Ukraine a cold winter and has issued a rather unambiguous warning. The image shows Geran drones flying through the sky. The message is simple: this winter, they could come raining down on Ukraine, quite literally “like snow on your head.”
🔵 Military Summary
📱Новости России | Военные Сводки
Air defense systems shot down 553 Ukrainian drones over Russian regions overnight, the Russian Defense Ministry reported.
Over Latvia, NATO fighter jets shot down a UAV overnight amid a large-scale attack by Ukrainian drones targeting the Leningrad Region. A total of 51 UAVs were shot down there overnight, Governor Alexander Drozdenko said.
There was damage reported in the area of the Ust-Luga port, but the fire ha…
#UkraineRussiaWar #MilitarySummary
Kyiv has proposed a mutual halt to Black Sea strikes through a third party — no answer from Moscow yet. The reason is obvious: Ukraine's grain exports collapsed up to 5.6-fold, warehouses are burning, and shelves in Kyiv malls are emptying. Meanwhile, Russia hit Chornomorsk port, destroying fuel tanks, a bulk carrier and a tanker, while locomotives burn across the Odesa region. Zele…
🏴☠️The EU has asked 🇧🇷Brazil to act as a mediator in dialogue with 🇷🇺Russia, said Lula da Silva’s adviser Celso Amorim.
According to him, Western European diplomats have approached both him and the Brazilian president, viewing Brazil as one of the few countries that maintains dialogue with both the West and Moscow.
🔵 Military Summary
📱Новости России | Военные Сводки
Putin threatens retaliation if European governments seize Russian-linked commercial vessels, as Western pressure on Moscow’s shadow fleet increasingly moves from sanctions to direct action at sea. Meanwhile, Iran says talks with Washington have stalled as pressure builds over sanctions, the nuclear issue and the Strait of Hormuz. Russia and Ukraine also trade another wave of long-range strikes against ports, refineri…
🇷🇺 Lavrov:
Russia will independently choose targets for its response to the “banditry and piracy” of Western countries; they do not necessarily have to be in the same waters.
🔵 Military Summary
📱Новости России | Военные Сводки
Ukraine has proposed to Russia a mutual halt to strikes on civilian targets in the Black Sea.
📰 Reuters
The proposal was conveyed to Moscow through a third party, but Kyiv has not yet received a response.
🔵 Military Summary
📱Новости России | Военные Сводки
🇯🇵 Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi protested Putin’s visit to Iturup. She noted that the Southern Kurils are Japanese territory and that the Russian president’s visit would make it more difficult to restore relations between the two countries.
«Girlfriend», if this is Japanese land, then come and put your flag there. But you can’t. And if you can’t, do what you can: for example, praise the country that dropped…
🎖🎖🎖 Russian forces continue their offensive!
🇷🇺Units of the “Center” Group of Forces have taken control of the settlement of 📌 Petrovka in the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR)!
‼️Follow the situation at the front on our map:
Military Summary Map
Or download the app for your phone 👇
Download the app for iOS
Download the app for Android
#UkraineRussiaWar #MilitarySummary
Yesterday evening, Zelensky proudly announced significant Ukrainian gains in the northern Zaporizhzhia direction, publishing a video of raised flags. But there's a catch: the footage shows winter landscapes — the flags were raised between November 2025 and early July 2026, and since then the Russians have already recaptured some of these territories. This is part of Ukraine's new op…
🇷🇺 Russia and 🇺🇦 Ukraine carried out an exchange of the bodies of fallen servicemen.
The Russian side handed over 261 bodies, while Ukraine handed over 24.
🔵 Military Summary
📱Новости России | Военные Сводки
🦄49🙏47🫡18👍8🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @militarysummary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 231,672 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 114,198 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Intel Slava @intelslava · 395,572 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Denys Davydov @pilotblog · 201,167 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
DD Geopolitics @DDGeopolitics · 191,512 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates @geopolitics_prime · 295,148 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Global News Monitor @warmonitors · 155,323 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Military Summary” (@militarysummary), 77,284 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/militarysummary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
