International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 76,982–77,519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 05:55
77,306
-44
18 Sept 2026, 20:40
77,350
+17
16 Sept 2026, 10:02
77,333
-42
14 Sept 2026, 17:58
77,375
-12
13 Sept 2026, 07:56
77,387
-25
11 Sept 2026, 09:39
77,412
+2
8 Sept 2026, 14:18
77,410
-9
5 Sept 2026, 06:41
77,419
+1
3 Sept 2026, 09:44
77,418
-4
2 Sept 2026, 03:13
77,422
-15
1 Sept 2026, 02:06
77,437
-15
31 Aug 2026, 03:03
77,452
-5
30 Aug 2026, 00:54
77,457
+1
29 Aug 2026, 01:52
77,456
+17
27 Aug 2026, 23:03
77,439
+36
27 Aug 2026, 02:04
77,403
+62
26 Aug 2026, 00:22
77,341
+49
25 Aug 2026, 02:12
77,292
-16
23 Aug 2026, 13:24
77,308
-12
21 Aug 2026, 20:55
77,320
first reading
Engagement
1,028 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.88%
avg views ÷ 77,306 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,870
681 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
681
of 1,028 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
1,028 (5 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
4,675,674
Reactions total
90,819
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 13:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈18,100
Videos
≈8,690
Links
≈14,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 10m
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 355 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
146,713 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
39,720
27.1%
🔥
22,915
15.6%
❤
16,846
11.5%
🤣
11,686
7.97%
😁
10,393
7.08%
🖕
9,686
6.60%
👏
6,700
4.57%
😡
5,356
3.65%
🍾
4,067
2.77%
🤔
2,502
1.71%
🤪
2,318
1.58%
💯
2,291
1.56%
🙏
2,001
1.36%
💊
1,861
1.27%
🫡
1,499
1.02%
❤🔥
761
0.519%
😴
645
0.44%
☃
631
0.43%
😢
591
0.403%
🦄
459
0.313%
29 further kinds
3,785
2.58%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146,713 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
57
across the posts below
Posts paid on
42
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @militarysummary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇺🇸 Trump supports easing sanctions on 🇷🇺 Russia if an agreement can be reached on the release of prisoners.
📰 The Atlantic
The new initiative, which is still in its early stages and has not previously been reported, could advance several of Trump’s goals at once. Trump reportedly backed the plan several months ago.
It could help reintegrate Russia into the global economy and broaden Trump’s talks with the Kremlin …
The noise around Operation "Vivaldi" keeps growing. 🔍
Yesterday, Ukrainian sources published footage of the assault on the village of Novoye. In the episode where the Ukrainian kamikaze BTR drives into the village, the TV tower is clearly seen destroyed — lying on the ground.
Today, Russian sources published a refutation video clearly showing the same TV tower — damaged, but standing upright.
So either Russian for…
Russia plans a record defense budget of 17.1 trillion rubles ($203 billion) for 2027 — 27% above the previous plan.
Together with security and police spending, the military-security sector will account for 43.9% of the federal budget.
Defense spending for 2027–2029 will total about 50 trillion rubles ($590 billion), while public debt will exceed 20% of GDP.
The figures indicate Moscow is budgeting for a high-inten…
🎖️🎖️🎖️ Russian forces have taken control of the settlements of 📌Vesele Pole and 📌Kreidianka, the Russian Ministry of Defense reports.
‼️Follow the situation at the front on our map:
Military Summary Map
Or download the app for your phone 👇
Download the app for iOS
Download the app for Android
Support the project: Boosty
#UkraineRussiaWar #MilitarySummary
Putin has signed the decree: Russia's armed forces are now authorized at 2,441,630 — half a million more than when the war began. Kyiv claims 8,000+ North Korean troops are already in Russia with 10,000 more coming, while a new 800-km Iskander variant could bring western Ukraine into ballistic range. 🪖
Three waves of strikes hit Kyiv in 36 hours — the National Academy flattened, Br…
🇮🇷 Iran’s parliament will consider a proposal for the country to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Fars reports, citing Deputy Parliament Speaker Ali Nikzad. According to him, lawmakers will also examine the international aspects and potential consequences of such a decision.
🔵Military Summary
📱Новости России | Военные Сводки
🇺🇦 Zelensky:
We have new information about the deployment of 🇰🇵 North Korean troops to 🇷🇺 Russia. More than 8,000 North Korean military personnel are currently there.
Another 10,000 are undergoing selection and training for subsequent deployment.
In return, Russia is providing technology: with Russian technical assistance, North Korea has established production of Shahed-type attack drones.
🔵Military Summary
📱Нов…
🚨 Overnight, Russian air defenses shot down 129 Ukrainian drones over several regions of Russia, according to the Russian Defense Ministry.
No consequences have been reported.
🔵Military Summary
📱Новости России | Военные Сводки
❗️The Russian Armed Forces are in Redkodub
Fresh objective control footage from the settlement of Redkodub in the Donetsk region confirms the reliable retention of this settlement by units of the 20th Army of the "West" group. 🎥🪖
Coordinates: 49.1802, 37.8185
👍93🫡29❤8❤🔥6🔥2😁2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,028 posts we hold for @militarysummary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@militarysummary edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 September 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Suriyakmaps @Suriyak_maps · 47,079 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
UKR LEAKS_eng @ukr_leaks_eng · 75,411 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
AMK Mapping @AMK_Mapping · 59,757 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Rybar in English @rybar_in_english · 77,697 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
RT Documentary @militarywave · 41,278 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Two Majors - English Channel @two_majors · 47,334 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Ukraine Watch @ukraine_watch · 68,938 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
El Resumen Militar @elresumenmilitar · 26,915 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
MoD Russia @mod_russia_en · 94,662 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
War Leaks 18+ (Channel) @warleaks11 · 68,456 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH @infodefENGLAND · 50,337 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
The Right People Z @the_Right_People · 36,432 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Kremlin. News @news_kremlin_eng · 26,884 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
The Islander @TheIslanderNews · 61,791 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Scott Ritter @ScottRitter · 86,630 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel @sitreports · 23,026 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Patrick Lancaster News Today @patricklancasternewstoday · 40,339 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
The Duran @thedurancom · 51,949 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 113,042 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel @brianlovethailand · 40,969 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Victor vicktop55 @vicktop55 · 26,809 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺 @AussieCossack · 68,753 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinkle · 33,806 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Russians With Attitude @rwapodcast · 36,686 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Military Summary” (@militarysummary), 77,306 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/militarysummary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.