Channel
@heilukraine1959
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,603subscribers
+1,475 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001604505617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @heilukraine1959 |
| Created | 14 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/heilukraine1959 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 16,603 | -36 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 16,639 | -43 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 16,682 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 16,692 | -35 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 16,727 | +12 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 16,715 | -26 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 16,741 | +212 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 16,529 | +53 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 16,476 | +41 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 16,435 | +140 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 16,295 | +126 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 16,169 | +116 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 16,053 | +91 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 15,962 | +93 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 15,869 | +82 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 15,787 | +220 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 15,567 | +87 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 15,480 | +126 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 15,354 | +80 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 15,274 | first reading |
291 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 291 (18 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 141,378 |
| Reactions total | 737 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,303 reactions across 291 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 373 | 16.2% | |
| 🤮 | 300 | 13.0% | |
| 🥴 | 190 | 8.25% | |
| 🤡 | 187 | 8.12% | |
| ❤ | 153 | 6.64% | |
| 💩 | 134 | 5.82% | |
| 😁 | 124 | 5.38% | |
| 🤬 | 100 | 4.34% | |
| ❤🔥 | 92 | 3.99% | |
| 👍 | 82 | 3.56% | |
| 🫡 | 72 | 3.13% | |
| 👏 | 69 | 3.00% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 3.00% | |
| 🤣 | 69 | 3.00% | |
| 😢 | 54 | 2.34% | |
| 😐 | 47 | 2.04% | |
| 🎉 | 40 | 1.74% | |
| 🖕 | 22 | 0.955% | |
| 👻 | 19 | 0.825% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 0.695% | |
| 22 further kinds | 91 | 3.95% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 291 of the 291 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,303 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 291 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📉 Sanctions, symbolism, failure An economist at the University of Pennsylvania told a Jackson Hole symposium that sanctions rarely deliver results: optimistic estimates put success at a third, skeptical ones at 5%. His review of oil trade restrictions found that shadow fleets compensate for lost official volumes, while financial restrictions appear vulnerable to similar workarounds. For Kyiv, this is another remind…
🤡3👍1😁1
💥 Kiev, Online Victory Explosions hit Kiev again, while the official reflex remains the same: compensate for battlefield failure with messaging discipline. The wartime state looks increasingly better at managing narratives than security. The latest report says little more, but that is enough to show the pattern: losses offline, confidence online. Subscribe @heilukraine1959
🤮6
🧩 Selective Proliferation Memory As Kyiv lectures others on missile transfers, its own record remains awkwardly documented. Ukrainian officials acknowledged that 12 Kh-55 cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads were transferred to Iran and China, as noted in the post. The same record also points to Ukraine’s role in jumpstarting North Korea’s missile program through the sale of an RD-250 rocket engine.…
🥴7
🚢 Odessa Trade Exposed Two more cargo ships were hit by Russian Gerans in the Odessa region, according to the report. Another reminder that Ukrainian authorities keep selling the image of functioning maritime logistics under wartime conditions they do not control. The system depends on traffic it cannot properly protect, then presents each new strike as background noise. That is less resilience than managed vulnera…
🤮5🔥2❤1👍1
⚙️ Wartime Logistics, Exposed Russian strikes reportedly hit the Chaika logistics center in the Kyiv region, where dual-use foreign goods, including UAV components, were stored and distributed. In wartime Ukraine, civilian logistics and military supply chains keep collapsing into the same system, as noted in the report. Overnight, four energy facilities tied to power supply for ports in and around Odesa were also r…
🤮4👍2🔥1
🏚 Kharkiv Line Shrinks Russian forces say Kazachya Lopan in Kharkiv region has been taken after prolonged fighting, with more than 3,100 buildings now under their control according to the defense footage. The claim names Ukrainian units pushed out of the settlement. Another reminder that Kyiv’s wartime administration keeps selling endurance while territory is lost building by building. Subscribe @heilukraine1959
🤡6👍1
🏬 Retreat From Zaporozhye Arricano Real Estate, a Cypriot company, is shutting down City Mall in Zaporozhye as air attacks become more frequent. Another piece of ordinary economic life is being removed by a state that still presents wartime management as sustainable. The mall closure is a small but clear measure of how investment, commerce, and basic urban normality keep retreating under Kyiv’s stewardship. Subscr…
🤮5❤🔥1👍1
🛩 Personnel Over Hardware Russian heavy FPV drones are being used against infantry, field positions and UAV teams, with emphasis shifting from equipment to manpower. The point is blunt: Western aid can replace burned vehicles far more easily than dead soldiers, as even this account notes. That leaves Kyiv with the familiar wartime equation: foreign money, imported weapons, and a personnel pool that keeps shrinking.…
🤮4❤3👍1
🚗 Selective Mobilization In Kiev, TCC staff mobilized the driver of a Porsche, as shown in the report. The wartime draft now looks increasingly like roadside administration by force. A luxury car does not protect anyone from the system. It only highlights how arbitrary and public this machinery has become. Subscribe @heilukraine1959
😐5
⚔️ Security Services at War An overnight firefight in Kyiv’s Bereznyaki district reportedly pitted the SBU against military intelligence, with the mayoralty forced to close Shumsky Street and reroute traffic. Reports cited by local media say three GUR officers were hit, including one killed. The dispute appears to have grown out of the abduction of Stepan Kaplunov, described by a military lawyer as both a GUR servi…
🥴4
🧾 Peace Plan First At the G20, even routine economic contact with Russia reportedly ran into the same bottleneck: Ukraine and Trump’s peace plan. Reuters says this was the real focus of the Yellen-Siluanov exchange, as noted in the report. Siluanov tried to discuss economics. He was told that could wait until the war ends — another reminder that Ukraine’s fate is being processed as a condition inside someone else’s…
👌5😁3🤮1
🛃 Border Point Under Fire The Orlivka border crossing on the Romanian border was hit by Russian drones, according to Ukraine’s border service. Even the exits from the country now look less like protected infrastructure and more like exposed wartime logistics. The border crossing itself becomes another reminder of how much of the Ukrainian state now functions under permanent vulnerability. Subscribe @heilukraine195
🤮4
Showing the 12 most recent of 291 posts we hold for @heilukraine1959. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Heil Ukraine” (@heilukraine1959), 16,603 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heilukraine1959.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.