Channel
@rybar_pacific
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
27,315subscribers
+3,386 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002787702713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rybar_pacific |
| Description | Хоть океан и назван Тихим, вокруг него в последнее время шумновато. Слушаем, фиксируем, анализируем. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rybar_pacific |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
27,300 average views per post against 27,315 subscribers — an engagement rate of 99.8%. Across the 12,673 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,016–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.36% and 17.3%, with a median of 8.65%.
| Window | 30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 57 of 57 published in the window (0 exact, 57 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,553,850 |
| Mature posts only | 114.0% over 44 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 27,315 measured 25 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:rus · 12,673 channels · p10 2.23% · p25 4.36% · p50 8.65% · p75 17.3% · p90 30.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.771th percentile · 11.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.115% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:02 | 27,315 | +610 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 26,705 | +137 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 26,568 | +122 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 26,446 | +133 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 26,313 | +179 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 26,134 | +130 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 26,004 | +115 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 25,889 | +104 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:13 | 25,785 | +65 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:32 | 25,720 | +71 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 25,649 | +83 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 25,566 | +67 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 25,499 | +61 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 25,438 | +85 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 25,353 | +76 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 25,277 | +61 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 25,216 | +57 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 25,159 | +122 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 25,037 | +112 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 24,925 | first reading |
200 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 200 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,553,850 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 20:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📝Сбавили темп📝 Тихоокеанские страны не устраивает антикитайская повестка Противостояние с Китаем на дальних рубежах в Азиатско-Тихоокеанском регионе неизменно лежит на плечах руководства Австралии. Однако пока ему с трудом удается навязывать свою позицию соседям. Островные государства Океании решили не форсировать расширение полномочий Тихоокеанской группы реагирования (Pacific Response Group) — созданной в 2024 го…
📝Доступ под вопросом📝 В Индонезии спорят о новых правилах президентских выборов Если политические оппоненты могут использовать студенческие протесты в своих интересах, расслабляться не стоит. К важным событиям в таком случае лучше готовиться заранее. В Индонезии партии обсуждают новые правила выдвижения кандидатов на президентских выборах 2029 года. Один из вариантов — требовать поддержки как минимум двух парламент…
📝Атом возвращается📝 На Тайване возрождают АЭС Современное развитие на базе ИИ и передовых технологий требует больших объемов стабильного энергоснабжения. А если на вашем острове энергоресурсов изначально немного, то именно атомные реакторы выглядят самым приемлемым решением. Тайваньские власти одобрили предварительный план перезапуска АЭС «Мааньшань», остановленной в 2025 году после окончания 40-летнего срока экспл…
📝Неожиданный поворот📝 В Токио пытаются понять американские планы В японском руководстве возникла явная растерянность после того, как Дональд Трамп назвал нынешний Китай союзником США во время Второй мировой войны. Эта формулировка прозвучала не только на встрече с Си Цзиньпином, но и нашла отражение в итоговых материалах Белого дома. Для Токио эти слова оказались особенно чувствительными. Всего несколькими днями ра…
📝Большая фарма идет в Китай📝 А там только и рады новым вложениям Какие компании приходят в голову, когда задумываешься о бизнес-сотрудничестве Китая и США? Может, Apple с высоким спросом на их телефоны в Поднебесной или Tesla с мегафабрикой в стране? Оба варианта, конечно, верны, но партнерство идет не только по линии технологий. Ужин в честь Си Цзиньпина в Вашингтоне запомнился не только отсутствием полноценной де…
📝Наследие прошлого📝 Пытается напомнить о себе Оказывается, Южный Вьетнам не пал во второй половине XX века — по крайней мере, так считают его вьетнамские эмигранты в США. Пока американские власти укрепляют отношения с руководством в Ханое, в Штатах вновь стали заметны местные активисты из-за визита лидера страны То Лама в Нью-Йорк и Вашингтон. В соцсетях сейчас распространяется видео, на котором сторонники бывшего …
📝Китайцы заполонили рынок📝 В Европе и Китае пытаются решить торговые споры Одна торговая война, участниками которой стали китайцы и американцы, была отложена до января следующего года. Правда, новости с еще одного «фронта» — теперь уже европейского — продолжают поступать. Торговые переговоры Китая и ЕС уперлись сразу в две проблемы — медицинское оборудование и автомобили. Согласно инсайдам, обсуждение медицинских г…
📝Чужая память📝 Трамп невольно подыграл китайцам Похоже, руководство Японии небезосновательно нервничало по поводу американо-китайских переговоров. Американский президент неожиданно предоставил китайцам дополнительный аргумент в историческом споре с японцами. На встрече с Си Цзиньпином Дональд Трамп назвал Китай союзником США во Второй мировой войне. Китайский лидер развил эту тему, заявив о совместной борьбе двух н…
📝Снова на грани📝 Китайские корабли перехватили филиппинскую миссию к аванпосту Недавняя стычка у отмели Сабина, похоже, стала предвестником нового витка противостояния между филиппинцами и китайцами в самом проблемном районе архипелага Спратли, который последние два года оставался относительно спокойным. Три корабля ВМС НОАК и пять судов береговой охраны Китая 24 сентября помешали плановой ротации и снабжению филип…
📝Дипломатический театр📝 Поели, пошутили, а результаты где? Уже скоро завершится государственный визит китайского лидера в США. Но кроме забавных моментов, например, реакции Дональда Трампа на пролет бомбардировщика, шутки про Джо Байдена и пары казусов с китайскими журналистами, которые «воевали» за места со своими коллегами, ничего больше запоминающегося не было. Встреча Трампа и Си Цзиньпина в Белом доме прошла б…
📝ИИ со вкусом АСЕАН📝 Планы — масштабные, ограничения — еще масштабнее ИИ-бум добрался до Юго-Восточной Азии и постепенно меняет цифровые возможности региона. Раньше главным центром притяжения был Сингапур, но теперь возле него формируется пояс дата-центров: малайзийский Джохор становится его продолжением, в Индонезии развивают площадки в Джакарте, да и в других странах пытаются занять свои ниши. 🔻Как обстоят дела в…
📝В обход Китая📝 Американцы закрепляются в вольфрамовой отрасли Вьетнама Одной из ключевых тем китайско-американских переговоров остается стабильный экспорт редкоземов в США. Однако в Вашингтоне времени зря не теряют и уже вовсю работают над выстраиванием альтернативных цепочек поставок без китайского влияния. Американская корпорация Elmet Group приобретет 4,99% акций вьетнамской горнодобывающей компании Masan High-…
Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @rybar_pacific. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@rybar_pacific edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 61 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АЗИАТАРЬ” (@rybar_pacific), 27,315 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rybar_pacific.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.