20.000 - 40.000 RUB за ваше тёплое интро, если у нас получится законнектиться с вашим знакомым из логистической / экспедиторской индустрии. Так-с, ну если вы видели вчерашний пост, то уже понимаете, что у меня появился один формат корп обучения для логистических компаний, у которых есть отдел холодных продаж от 10 человек. Есть крутые отзывы от других крупных логистических компаний и сейчас хочется зайти к HRD или К…

Channel
Заметки продавца B2B
@Salesnotes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,659subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001110496980 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Salesnotes |
| Created | 24 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Salesnotes |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 19:00 | 16,659 | -18 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 19:09 | 16,677 | +3 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:07 | 16,674 | -2 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:27 | 16,676 | +2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:26 | 16,674 | -4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:08 | 16,678 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:25 | 16,677 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:18 | 16,679 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:25 | 16,684 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:36 | 16,683 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 16,681 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:42 | 16,688 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 16,693 | +2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:48 | 16,691 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 16,703 | +6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:25 | 16,697 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 16,701 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:55 | 16,698 | -5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:30 | 16,703 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 16,705 | first reading |
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.5%
- avg views ÷ 16,659 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,920
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 61 (8 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 42,230 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 18:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 24
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 17
- of 61 we hold a reading for · 28%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Salesnotes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 61 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.64%
- 1 of 61 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 1,240
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 2,160
- over 60 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqvTmHgr | 1 | 10 November 2026 | 10 November 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (13.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Тестирую новый метод аутрича на своём примере В общем, в прошлом месяце ко мне с входящим запросом на корп обучение пришли 3 компаний из логистической сферы. И мне показалось, что это «знак», что нужно самому хорошенько проработать эту нишу, чтобы как минимум позакидывать «зёрна» в другие логистические компании. Ведь у меня есть кейсы работы с этой нишей + я знаю достаточно хорошо их услугу и болевые моменты по част…
Про прямые продажи На связи Лев Пикалёв, основатель сервиса Б2Б Флоу — CRM для долгих, точечных и мучительных продаж. Важное уточнение: Б2Б Флоу не заменит вашу привычную CRM, а поможет сфокусироваться на том, что происходит до того, как лид попадает в вашу воронку. Это отдельный инструмент, который нужен для прямых продаж и для выстраивания отношений с вашими потенциальными клиентами. Поэтому, если вы не занимает…
Про карьерный рост аудитории канала или как мне повезло, что я писал контент для рядовых В2В сейлзов Смотрите прикол. Большинство авторов в бизнес тематике пишут свой контент для собственников / держателей бюджета. Оно логично, тк через тексты ты продаешь свои услуги и нужно целится вот в таких вот ЛПРов НО…но Канал сам я веду с 2017 года, и до 2021 года, пока я работал в найме я никак его не монетизировал, поэтом…
Как отвечать, когда вас отправляют на Info? Что-то меняется, а что-то вечно. Тут сегодняшний пример использования техники «брат за брата», когда через отдел продаж удаётся узнать контакт ЛПРа, когда иные способы не прокатили. Более подробно об этом способе писал аж в 2017г, на заре начала ведения этого канала. И вот из таких прикладных приемов состоит книга «360 заметок продавца В2В», так что кому актуально, рекомен…
уже 5й год работаю с клиентами из России, будучи при этом жителем Беларуси…И вот все эти 5 лет узнаю о том, что сегодня нерабочий день в сам этот день)) Даже у коллеги на всякий случай уточнил (об этом скрин). Но больше всего любой белорус офигивает конечно, от опции 2х недельных выходных в начале января и в начале мая. Для контекста, у нас часто 2 января уже может быть рабочим днем (если оно не попало на сб или вск…
Как вас (или вы) однажды продавили на переговорах? За одну из историй подарю билет на 2х дневный офлайн тренинг по переговорам к Игорю Рызову )) Одна фраза развернула разговор, который уже казался проигранным, или клиент дожал на скидку, а вы потом неделю злились на себя? Давайте соберём такие истории в комментах. Вместе с Fox Hunt подарим автору одной из них билет категории «Бизнес» на офлайн-тренинг Игоря Рызова в…
Чтобы клиенты покупали повторно, достаточно втирать в десна простой советский... В начале 2022 года я работал в диджитал агентстве. После старта СВО все перекосоебилось, клиенты поотваливались, мы судорожно искали новых. У нас была шальная идея сделать лид-магнит и запустить на него рекламу в телеге. Я начал собирать телеграм каналы для размещения — и наткнулся на канал Тараса Алтунина про В2В продажи. Я готов был к…
7 согласились. 2 деликатно отказались. У 3х статус «не просмотрено» (но ведь можно читать в режиме «предпросмотр»)) 3 проигнорировали два сообщение, статус просмотрено. Во втором пинге я специально уточнил, что это реально мой аккаунт и прикрепленный канал в описании этому подтверждение. Это увеличило на 2 встречи, тк на первое ответило изначально 5 человек. Третьего и последуещего пинга не будет, тк это уже как буд…
Написал 15 подписчикам канала с предложением созвониться. Как думаете, сколько согласилось? 10 дней назад рассказывал, что идентифицировал своих читателей канала и помимо ников в тг, у 1200 человек в профиле тг было указано чем они занимаются и в каких компаниях. Пару дней назад я выборочно написал 15 людям из этого списка, с предложением запланировать неформальный онлайн созвон в духе random coffee. На сегодня мож…
Что меня выручает даже в самые тяжёлые времена предпринимательства? Диверсификация продуктов и услуг, на которых я могу зарабатывать. Вот, например, в августе и сентябре наблюдалась ощутимая просадка по рекламодателям в Telegram. И это не только у меня. В нашем чате авторов каналов периодически эту тему обсуждаем, большинство замечают похожую картину. К моему счастью, реклама в канале лишь один из моих источников …
По следам выступления на Суровом: промежуточные итоги и выводы Мы с вами тут честны с друг другом, поэтому скажу так 1. На моем выступление было мало людей и это х@ево. Стараясь анализировать почему пришло 20 человек из 60 возможных, я склоняюсь к вариантам а) очень узкая тема, которую я ещё больше сузил, сказав в названии, что выступление для собственников (а таких на всей конфе от силы 20% было) б) В паралель бы…
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @Salesnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @Salesnotes as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 5 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@pisarevich · 17,1439 postsУпал, поднялся — блог Славы Рюмина
@ruminblog · 63,5515 postsAI story | Игорь Иванов
@eventstory_by · 5,0294 postsEVENT HR
@event_hr · 3,7092 postsАнтон Руденко
@anton_indeed · 3981 postАрстанРулитПродажи
@artyrules · 921 postaviaspot | easy sell easy buy
@aviaspotmoscow · 2141 postB2B РЕХАБ | Михаил Греков
@b2brehab · 6491 postB2B Rocket
@b2brocket · 3061 postDan Gridin on ABM (и не только)
@dg_abm · 3,5141 postИзиB2B
@izib2b · 5801 post[Гурбанов] Кирилл говорил
@kgrbnv · 19,8541 postLinkedIn with Sofia
@linkedinwithsofia · 3,4011 postПартнеры с привилегиями
@PartnersWithBenefits · 2771 postЖеня про найм b2b sales
@salesmatch · 1,0881 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@VitalyGolitzyn · 26,732
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
@olegcloser · 35,486
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@vyakuba · 49,069
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
@kotperegovor · 42,758
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@Maxim_Batyrev · 20,702
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
@ryzov_igor · 46,714
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
@bitrix24_ru · 29,024
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
@iRukovoditel · 30,925
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
@alexander_visotsky · 36,730
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
@pohodu_media · 27,887
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 9 September 2026
@dindex · 22,222
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки продавца B2B” (@Salesnotes), 16,659 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Salesnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.